Skip to main content
Log in

Human Capital Composition and Economic Growth

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of various compositions of human capital on economic growth. We construct alternative measures of human capital composition using five fields of study. In each instance, the measure represents the number of graduates in the respective field as a percentage of all graduates. The measures are as follows: agriculture human capital (AGR); high-tech human capital (TECH); business and service human capital (SERVICE); the humanities human capital (HUMAN); and health and welfare human capital (HEALTH). This paper uses the OLS and System-Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) models to explain differential rates of growth among developed and developing countries. The evidence indicates the significant effects of education and high-tech human capital on growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We do not estimate the effect of primary education on economic growth here, since the average gross enrolment rate is 103.85% for our samples between year 1999 to 2006. That is, primary educations are almost fully established.

References

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, G., & Spagat, M. (1998). The evolution of modern educational systems: Technical versus general education, distributional conflict and growth. CEPR discussion paper, 1925.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, M. (1998). Tertiary education and economic growth. Regional Studies, 32, 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. & Luoh, M. (2009). Are mathematics and science test scores good indicators of labor-force quality? (in press).

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34, 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. R. (2006). Investment in primary, secondary, and higher education and the effects on economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 39(4), 1101–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwabena, G., Oliver, P., & Workie, M. (2006). Higher education and economic growth in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 42, 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Kim, B. (2009). Both institutions and policies matter but differently for different income groups of countries: Determinants of long-run economic growth revisited. World Development, 37(3), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, W. (1999) Quality improvement in undergraduate education. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the Global Consortium of Higher Education and Research for Agriculture, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Loening, J. (2005) Effects of primary, secondary, and tertitary educaiton on economic growth: Evidence from guatemala. Policy Research Working Ppaer NO. 3610, World Bank.

  • Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal Economics, CVI(2), 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis, P. E., & Stamakis, D. (2002). Growth and education levels: A comparative analysis. Economics of Education Review, 21, 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, H. M. (2006). Can higher education foster economic growth? Chicago Fed Letter, Number 229.

  • Stephan, K. (1997). Which level of schooling has the greatest economic impact on output? Applied Economics Letters, 4, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiago, N. S. (2007). Human capital composition, growth and development: An R&D growth model versus data. Empirical Economics, 32, 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are particularly gratefully to the anonymous referees and the editor (A. C. Michalos) whose insightful and constructive comments have substantially improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Li Tsai.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6 Country list
Table 7 Data resources

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, CL., Hung, MC. & Harriott, K. Human Capital Composition and Economic Growth. Soc Indic Res 99, 41–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9565-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9565-z

Keywords

Navigation