Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Money, Trust and Happiness in Transition Countries: Evidence from Time Series

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trends of subjective well-being (SWB) in transition countries are peculiar: they show substantial changes that are more strongly correlated with the trends of GDP than in other developed countries. This paper examines the role of the trends of GDP and of social trust in predicting the trends of well-being. We find that the strength of the relationship between social trust and SWB over the medium-term is comparable to that of GDP. We conclude that in the medium-term, even in countries where material concerns strongly affect well-being, social trust is a powerful predictor of the trends of SWB. However, in the short run the relationship between social trust and SWB does not hold and GDP stands out as the only significant correlate of SWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Easterlin and Angelescu (2009) and Easterlin et al. (2010) criticized these results arguing that they fail to distinguish between the long and the short run. In particular, Easterlin and colleagues showed that the positive and significant relation estimated by Stevenson and Wolfers (2008) and Sacks et al. (2010) is generated by the inclusion in the sample of countries with short time-series. Easterlin et al. (2010) documented that GDP matters for SWB in the short run, but that this correlation vanishes in the long-term. The tendency of SWB and GDP to vary together during contractions and expansions has been documented also by Di Tella et al. (2001) and Bartolini and Sarracino (2014).

  2. See the pioneering studies by Helliwell (2001, 2006) and Helliwell and Putnam (2004), Bruni and Stanca (see also 2008) and Becchetti et al. (2008).

  3. Opinions about social capital under communism differ. The “dictatorship theory of social capital” states that dictatorship destroys trust and cooperation among citizens (Fidrmuc and Gërxhani 2008; Paldam and Svendsen 2001). On the other hand, Paldam and Svendsen (2001) claims that an inefficient planned economy forced creation of “negative social capital”, i.e. informal networks (gray zones, corruption) that “fixed” the economic system and allowed its functioning despite inefficiencies.

  4. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org.

  5. In the WVS/EVS the distances between two consecutive waves are not regular, ranging from 1 to 8 years. It is therefore impossible to attribute the variations between contiguous surveys to the long, medium and short-term. Having data that are regularly surveyed in time is fundamental to define which time horizon is measured by such intervals.

  6. World Development Indicators and Global Development Finance, http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do?Step=12&id=4&CNO=2.

  7. This result is also confirmed for models with non standardized variables, see “Appendix 3”.

  8. Dfbetas measure how much a given coefficient changes after excluding a specific country from the sample (Coxe et al. 2013, p. 49). In the medium run the influential countries are: Hungary, Slovakia and Ukraine (model for happiness) and Estonia and Poland (model for life satisfaction). In the short run the influential countries are: Estonia, Hungary and Ukraine (model for happiness) and Hungary and Bulgaria (model for life satisfaction).

References

  • Abbott, P., & Sapsford, R. (2006). Life-satisfaction in post-soviet Russia and Ukraine. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, P., Wallace, C., & Sapsford, R. (2011). Surviving the transformation: Social quality in Central Asia and the Caucuses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. (2001). Missing data. SAGE University Paper (Vol. 136).

  • Andrèn, D., & Martinsson, P. (2006). What contributes to life satisfaction in transitional Romania? Review of Development Economics, 10(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, W., Hermkens, P., & Van Wijck, P. (1995). Anomie, distributive injustice and dissatisfaction with material well-being in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 36(1–2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. (2010). Manifesto per la felicità: Come passare dalla società del ben-avere a quella del ben-essere. Roma: Donzelli editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013a). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2013b). Predicting the trend of well-being in Germany: How much do comparisons, adaptation and sociability matter? Social Indicators Research, 3(114), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., & Bonatti, L. (2008). Endogenous growth, decline in social capital and expansion of market activities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(3), 917–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics, 108, 242–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of chinese growth: declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development, 74, 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability and happiness. Kyklos, 61(3), 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2005). Free to trust? Economic freedom and social capital. Working Paper Series 2005:2, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. (2008). International evidence on well-being. IZA Discussion Papers (Vol. 3354).

  • Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Yuan, H. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3–4), 506–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Generalized linear models, chapter 3. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods: Statistical Analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 26–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J. (2010). From materialist to post-materialist happiness? National affluence and determinants of life satisfaction in cross-national perspective. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2009). Lost in transition: Life satisfaction on the road to capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 130–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R., & Angelescu, L. (2009). Happiness and growth the world over: Time series evidence on the happiness-income paradox (Vol. 4060). IZA Discussion Paper.

  • Easterlin, R. A., Angelescu, L., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESS. (2008). European social survey round 1 to 4 data. Technical report, Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.

  • Ferrer-i Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidrmuc, J., & Gërxhani, K. (2008). Mind the gap! Social capital, East and West. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., Geishecker, I., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2006). Can the large swings in Russian life satisfaction be explained by ups and downs in real incomes? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(3), 433–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Investigating the patterns and determinants of life satisfaction in Germany following reunification. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 649–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grün, C., & Klasen, S. (2001). Growth, income distribution and well-being in transition countries. The Economics of Transition, 9(2), 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guriev, S., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2009). (Un)happiness in transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2), 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. (2001). Social capital, the economy and wellbeing. In The review of economic performance: The longest Decade: Canada in the 1990s. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards.

  • Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. (2011). Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore prison case study. International journal of well-being, 1(2), 255–265. doi:10.5502/ijw.v1i2.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360. Henry Special Issue.

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions: Royal Society of London Series Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasa, A., & Parts, E. (2008). Individual-level determinants of social capital in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 51(2), 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2001). Trust, associational life and economic performance. In J. Helliwell & A. Bonikowska (Eds.), The contribution of human and social capital to sustained economic growth and well-being (pp. 172–202). Ottawa and Paris: Human Resources Development Canada and OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelkes, O. (2006). Tasting freedom: Happiness, religion and economic transition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59(2), 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikucka, M., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Trends of social capital in 30 European countries, 1990–2008, chapter 12. In F. Sarracino & M. Mikucka (Eds.), Beyond money: The social roots of health and well-being. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). The evidence on social capital. In The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital (pp. 39–63). Paris: OECD.

  • Paldam, M., & Svendsen, G. T. (2001). Missing social capital and the transition in Eastern Europe. Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, 5, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1968). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, L., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiser, M., Rousso, A., & Steves, F. (2003). Trust in transition: Cross-country and firm evidence. Working Papers 82, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Office of the Chief Economist.

  • Rogers, S., Halstead, J., Gardner, K., & Carlson, C. (2010). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales. Applied Research of Quality of Life. doi:10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. (2009). Does too much trust hamper economic growth? Kyklos, 62(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER Working Paper Series (Vol. 16441).

  • Sanfey, P., & Teksoz, U. (2007). Does transition make you happy? The Economics of Transition, 15, 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarracino, F. (2011). Trends of social capital across Europe. Conference presentation. In Understanding value patterns in Europe—Fourth European Values Study workshop after 2008 wave. Faculty of Philosophy: Vilnius University.

  • Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman and Hall: CRC, CRC Press Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. (1999). Norm: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model. Technical report. version 2.

  • Sissenich, B. (2010). Weak states, weak societies: Europe’s east-west gap. Acta Politica, 45(1–2), 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. IZA DP (Vol. 3654).

  • Sztompka, P. (1993). Civilizational incompetence: The trap of post-communist societies. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 22(2), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1996). Trust and emerging democracy lessons from Poland. International Sociology, 11(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1998). Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 1(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2001). Are the Russians as unhappy as they say they are? Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(2), 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. EHERO working paper 2013/1.

  • Zagórski, K. (2011). Income and happiness in time of post-communist modernization. Social Indicators Research, 104, 331–349. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9749-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R., & Cao, L. (2010). Social change and anomie: A cross-national study. Social Forces, 88(3), 1209–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Siena, Siena, Italy

    Stefano Bartolini

  2. Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Małgorzata Mikucka

  3. National University Higher School of Economics - Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Moscow, Russia

    Małgorzata Mikucka & Francesco Sarracino

  4. Institut national de la statistique et des ètudes èconomiques du Grand-Duchè du Luxembourg (STATEC), Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Francesco Sarracino

  5. GESIS Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences, Berlin, Germany

    Francesco Sarracino

Authors
  1. Stefano Bartolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Małgorzata Mikucka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Sarracino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sarracino.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Data Missingness in the ESS Data-Set

The sixth column of Table 5 informs that the percentage of missing data is on average <1 %. Only in the case of the index of social trust the percentage of missingness raises to 1.4 %. However, such a small percentage does not raise any particular worry for the reliability of our estimates (Allison 2001). Data missingness is further analysed across waves in Table 6. Figures inform that also in this case percentages of missingness are negligible and, according to the literature on data missingness, they are not likely to affect estimates (Schafer 1997, 1999; Allison 2001).

Table 5 Descriptive statistics for variables in the ESS data-set
Full size table
Table 6 Percentage of data missingness across waves in the ESS data-set
Full size table

Appendix 2: Factor Analysis for Trust Questions in the ESS

Table 7 informs that in the pooled sample, factor loadings range from 0.80 to 0.85 thus suggesting that the three variables contribute equally to the definition of a latent concept that we call “social trust”. When observing results across waves (see Table 8), we notice that discrepancies arise mainly in the first and third wave where factor loadings range from about 0.79 for the helpfulness variable to 0.84 for the fairness variable. The slight variability among factor loadings both in the pooled sample and within waves convinced us of the opportunity to build an aggregated index of social trust resulting from the standardized weighted average of the three items.

Table 7 Factor loading and unique variances for the pooled sample
Full size table
Table 8 Factor loading and unique variances across waves
Full size table

Appendix 3: Non-standardized Trivariate Regressions

See Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9 Medium-term trivariate regressions of subjective well-being over the index of social trust and GDP
Full size table
Table 10 Short-term trivariate regressions of subjective well-being over the index of social trust and GDP
Full size table

Appendix 4: Long-Term Relationships, Controlling for Outliers

See Table 11.

Table 11 Trivariate regressions of trends of subjective well-being over changes of the index of social trust and trends of GDP after excluding outliers (standardized values)
Full size table

Appendix 5: Short-Term Relationships, Controlling for Outliers

See Table 12.

Table 12 Trivariate regressions of trends of subjective well-being over changes of the index of social trust and trends of GDP after excluding outliers (standardized values)
Full size table

Appendix 6: Country Acronyms in the ESS

BG:

Bulgaria

CZ:

Czech Republic

EE:

Estonia

HU:

Hungary

PL:

Poland

RU:

Russian Federation

SI:

Slovenia

SK:

Slovakia

UA:

Ukraina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartolini, S., Mikucka, M. & Sarracino, F. Money, Trust and Happiness in Transition Countries: Evidence from Time Series. Soc Indic Res 130, 87–106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1130-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1130-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation