Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non Destructive Geophysical Monitoring of Water Content and Fluid Conductivity Anomalies in the Near Surface at the Border of an Agricultural

  • Published:
Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We use in this paper advanced geophysical techniques for the characterization and monitoring of subsurface properties such as porosity, water content and electrical conductivity of water. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and electrical conductivity measurements were recorded monthly during one year at the border of a corn field. Velocity analyses of multioffset GPR data were conducted to determine total porosity and to monitor vertical transport of water from the soil surface to the water table. The use of novel and original techniques for GPR processing (GPR velocity estimation by the Common Reflection Surface (CRS) method, kriging applied to GPR velocity) improved the estimate and the resolution of GPR velocity maps compared with the classical Normal MoveOut (NMO) and the bi-linear interpolation. Electrical resistivities were used to determine the effective porosity. The combination of GPR and electrical data permitted to estimate the electrical conductivity of water and to highlight high conductivity zones, possibly due to contamination by agricultural fertilizers. Independent determinations (grain size fractions, electrical conductivity, major ion content of water samples and porosity) were obtained, that validate our geophysical investigation. This study demonstrates the efficiency of non destructive geophysical approaches for providing accurate models of water content, porosity and electrical conductivity of water down to a depth of several meters in a poorly conductive soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greaves, R.J., Lesmes, D.P, Lee, J.M., and Tokoz, M.N., 1996. Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset ground penetrating radar. Geophysics. v. 61. p. 683--695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Loeffler, O., and Bano, M., 2004. Ground penetrating radar measurements in a controlled vadose zone: influence of water content. Vadose Zone v. 3. p. 1082--1092

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dannovski, G., and Yaramanci, U., 1999. Estimation of water content and porosity using combined radar and geoelectrical measurements. Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. v. 4. p. 71--85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagrey, S.A., and Müller, C., 2000. GPR study of pore water content and salinity in sand. Geophys. Prospect. v. 48, p. 63--85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gloaguen, E., Chouteau, M., Marcotte, D., and Chapuis, R., 2001, Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined aquifer using cokriging of GPR and hydrostratigraphic data. J. Appl. Geophy. v. 47. p. 135--152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garambois, S., Sénéchal, P., and Perroud, H., 2002. On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and electrical conductivity of water of near-surface formations. J. Hydrol. v. 259. p. 32--48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jäger, R., Mann, J., Höcht, G., and Hubral, P., 2001, Common-reflection surface stack: image and attributes. Geophysics v. 66 no. 1, p.~97--109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Perroud, H. and Tygel, M., 2005, Velocity estimation by CRS method: using GPR data. Geophysics, in press.

  9. Journel, A.G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, D.E., 1982, Matrix formulation of co-kriging. J. Math. Geol. v. 14. p. 249--257.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chambre d’Agriculture des Hautes Pyrénées, (1994), Lutte contre les pollutions d’origine agricole des nappes alluviales de Midi-Pyrénées. Z.E.M.E de Maubourguet- Larreule.Bilan 1991–1994. Report. 31 pp.

  12. Yilmaz, O., 1987, Seismic Data Processing. Society of Exploration Geophysics Series: Investigations in geophysisics, Vol. 2, SEG, Tulsa, USA. 526 p.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dix, C.H., 1955. Seismic velocities from the surface measurements. Geophysics. v. 20. p. 68--86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D., 1996. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resitivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys. Prospect. v. 44. p. 131--152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Groot-hedlin, C., and Constable, S., 1990, Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics. v. 55. p. 1613--1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis, J.L., and Annan, A.P., 1989. Ground penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys. Prospect. v. 37. p. 531--552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L., and Annan, A.P., 1980, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines: Water Resour. Res. v. 16, p. 574--582.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tinga, W.R., Voss W.A.G., and Blossey, D.F., 1973, Generalized approach to multiphase dielectric mixture theory. J. Appl. Phys., v. 44, no. 9, p. 3897--3902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roth, K., Schulin, R., Flühler, H., and Attinger, W., 1990, Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach. Water Resour. Res. v. 26, no. 10, p. 2267--2273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Birchak, J.R., Gardner, C.G., Hipp, J.E., and Victor, J.M., 1974, High dielectric constant microwave probes for sensing soil moisture. Proc. IEEE, v. 62, no. 1, p. 93--98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alharti, A., and Lange, J., 1987, Soil water saturation: dielectric determination. Water Resour. Res., v. 23, no. 4, p. 591--595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Handbook of Physics and Chemistry, 67 edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. 1986.

  23. Reynolds, J.M., 1997, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Wiley, Chichester, England. 796 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gueguen, Y., and Palciauskas, V., 1992, Introduction àla Physique des Roches. Hermann, France. 299 p.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards, R.N., 1997. On the resource evaluation of marine gas hydrate deposits using sea-floor transcient electric dipole--dipole methods. Geophysics. v. 62, p. 63--74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dannovski, G., and Yaramanci, U., 1999, Estimation of water content and porosity using combined radar and geoelectrical measurements. Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. v. 4. p. 71--85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McWhorter, D.B., and Sunata, D.K., 1977, Ground Water Hydrology and Hydraulics. Water Ressources Publications. Fort Collins, Colorado. 290 p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mari J.-L., Arens G., Chapellier D., and Gaudiani P., (1998). Géophysique de gisement et de gé.nie civil. Éditions Technip.Publications de l’institut franç.ais du pétrole. p. 373.

  29. Waxman, M., and Smits, L., 1968, Electrical conductivity in oil bearing shaky sands. Petrol. Eng. J., v. 243, p. 107--122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale Sénéchal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sénéchal, P., Perroud, H., Kedziorek, M.A.M. et al. Non Destructive Geophysical Monitoring of Water Content and Fluid Conductivity Anomalies in the Near Surface at the Border of an Agricultural. Subsurf Sens Technol Appl 6, 167–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-005-0005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-005-0005-0

Keywords

Navigation