Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reversible Image Steganography Using Dual-Layer LSB Matching

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sensing and Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, reversible information hiding (RIH) methods have drawn substantial attention in many privacy-sensitive real-time applications, such as the Internet of Things (IoT) enabled communications, electronic health care infrastructure, and military applications. The RIH methods are proven to be competent in such hyper-sensitive infrastructures where the loss of a single bit of information is not acceptable. In this paper, dual-layered based RIH method using modified least significant bit (LSB) matching has been proposed. The objective of the proposed work is to enhance the embedding efficiency (EE) using dual-layer based embedding strategy and to curtail the distortion caused to the stego-image to improve its quality. At the first layer of embedding, each pixel conceals two bits of information using the proposed modified LSB matching method to produce the intermediate pixel pair (IPP). Further, the IPP is utilized to conceal four bits of information during the next layer of embedding. Experimental study reveals that, the proposed method can embed 1,572,864 bits of secret data with peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 47.86 dB, 48.05 dB, 46.51 dB and 48.14 dB, for the respective images. Further, the image quality assessment parameters like structural similarity (SSIM) index and universal image quality index (Q) are as good as the existing literature. Additionally, the proposed method shows excellent anti-steganalysis ability to regular and singular (RS) and pixel difference histogram (PDH) analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi, Y. Q., Li, X., Zhang, X., Wu, H. T., & Ma, B. (2016). Reversible data hiding: Advances in the past two decades. IEEE Access, 4, 3210–3237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Subhedar, M. S., & Mankar, V. H. (2014). Current status and key issues in image steganography: A survey. Computer Science Review, 13, 95–113.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheddad, A., Condell, J., Curran, K., & Mc Kevitt, P. (2010). Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods. Signal Processing, 90(3), 727–752.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Pradhan, A., Sahu, A. K., Swain, G., & Sekhar, K. R. (2016). Performance evaluation parameters of image steganography techniques. In IEEE international conference on research advances in integrated navigation systems (pp. 1–8).

  5. Hussain, M., Wahab, A. W. A., Idris, Y. I. B., Ho, A. T., & Jung, K. H. (2018). Image steganography in spatial domain: A survey. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 65, 46–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sahu, A. K., & Swain, G. (2019). An optimal information hiding approach based on pixel value differencing and modulus function. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06393-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahu, A. K., & Swain, G. (2018). Pixel overlapping image steganography using PVD and modulus function. 3D Research, 9, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-018-0188-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahu, A. K., Swain, G., & Babu, E. S. (2018). Digital image steganography using bit flipping. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 18(1), 69–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutub, A. A. A. (2010). Pixel indicator technique for RGB image steganography. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sahu, A. K., & Swain, G. (2019). A novel n-rightmost bit replacement image steganography technique. 3D Research, 10, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-018-0211-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abu-Marie, W., Gutub, A., & Abu-Mansour, H. (2010). Image based steganography using truth table based and determinate array on RGB indicator. International Journal of Signal & Image Processing, 1(3), 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sahu, A. K., & Swain, G. (2019). A novel multi stego-image based data hiding method for gray scale image. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 27(2), 753–768.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liao, X., Qin, Z., & Ding, L. (2017). Data embedding in digital images using critical functions. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 58, 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao, X., Li, K., & Yin, J. (2017). Separable data hiding in encrypted image based on compressive sensing and discrete fourier transform. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(20), 20739–20753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao, X., Yu, Y., Li, B., Li, Z., & Qin, Z. (2019). A new payload partition strategy in color image steganography. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2896270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi, Y. Q., Ni, Z., Zou, D., Liang, C., & Xuan, G. (2004, May). Lossless data hiding: Fundamentals, algorithms and applications. In 2004 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37512) (Vol. 2, pp. II-33). IEEE.

  17. Barton, J. M. (1997). Method and apparatus for embedding authentication information within digital data, U.S. Patent 5646997.

  18. Tian, J. (2003). Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(8), 890–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alattar, A. M. (2004). Reversible watermark using the difference expansion of a generalized integer transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(8), 1147–1156.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, H. J., Sachnev, V., Shi, Y. Q., Nam, J., & Choo, H. G. (2008). A novel difference expansion transform for reversible data embedding. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 3(3), 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ni, Z., Shi, Y. Q., Ansari, N., & Su, W. (2006). Reversible data hiding. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 16(3), 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai, P., Hu, Y. C., & Yeh, H. L. (2009). Reversible image hiding scheme using predictive coding and histogram shifting. Signal Processing, 89(6), 1129–1143.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Thodi, D. M., & Rodríguez, J. J. (2007). Expansion embedding techniques for reversible watermarking. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(3), 721–730.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, J., Li, X., & Yang, B. (2013). Reversible data hiding scheme for color image based on prediction-error expansion and cross-channel correlation. Signal Processing, 93(9), 2748–2758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ou, B., Li, X., Zhao, Y., & Ni, R. (2014). Reversible data hiding using invariant pixel-value-ordering and prediction-error expansion. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 29(7), 760–772.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ou, B., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2016). Improved PVO-based reversible data hiding: A new implementation based on multiple histograms modification. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 38, 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ou, B., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2016). High-fidelity reversible data hiding based on pixel-value-ordering and pairwise prediction-error expansion. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 39, 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, X., Yang, B., & Zeng, T. (2011). Efficient reversible watermarking based on adaptive prediction-error expansion and pixel selection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20(12), 3524–3533.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, T. C., Tseng, C. Y., & Wu, J. H. (2015). Dual imaging-based reversible hiding technique using LSB matching. Signal Processing, 108, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mielikainen, J. (2006). LSB matching revisited. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 13(5), 285–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jung, K. H. (2015). Dual image based reversible data hiding method using neighbouring pixel value differencing. The Imaging Science Journal, 63(7), 398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, D. C., & Tsai, W. H. (2003). A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(9–10), 1613–1626.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Hussain, M., Wahab, A. W. A., Javed, N., & Jung, K. H. (2018). Recursive information hiding scheme through LSB, PVD shift, and MPE. IETE Technical Review, 35(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hameed, M. A., Aly, S., & Hassaballah, M. (2017). An efficient data hiding method based on adaptive directional pixel value differencing (ADPVD). Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(12), 14705–14723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. USC-SIPI Image Database. Retrieved 11 February, 2019 http://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php?volume=misc.

  36. Gutub, A., Al-Qahtani, A., & Tabakh, A. (2009). Triple-A: Secure RGB image steganography based on randomization. In IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, 2009. AICCSA 2009 (pp 400–403). IEEE.

  37. Hassaballah, M., Makky, M. M., & Mahdy, Y. B. (2005). A fast fractal image compression method based entropy. ELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, 5(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Swain, G. (2019). Two new steganography techniques based on quotient value differencing with addition-subtraction logic and PVD with modulus function. Optik, 180, 807–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Swain, G. (2016). Adaptive pixel value differencing steganography using both vertical and horizontal edges. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(21), 13541–13556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sahu, A. K., & Swain, G. (2019). Dual Stego-imaging based reversible data hiding using improved LSB matching. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 12(5), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, 522502, India

    Aditya Kumar Sahu & Gandharba Swain

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, GMRIT, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, 532127, India

    Aditya Kumar Sahu

Authors
  1. Aditya Kumar Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gandharba Swain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Kumar Sahu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahu, A.K., Swain, G. Reversible Image Steganography Using Dual-Layer LSB Matching. Sens Imaging 21, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-019-0262-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-019-0262-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation