Skip to main content
Log in

what is a disposition?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attempts to capture the distinction between categorical and dispositional states in terms of more primitive modal notions – subjunctive conditionals, causal roles, or combinatorial principles – are bound to fail. Such failure is ensured by a deep symmetry in the ways dispositional and categorical states alike carry modal import. But the categorical/dispositional distinction should not be abandoned; it underpins important metaphysical disputes. Rather, it should be taken as a primitive, after which the doomed attempts at reductive explanation can be transformed into circular but interesting accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. M. Armstrong (1996) ArticleTitle‘Categoricalist Versus Dispositionalist Accounts of Properties’ Acta Analytica 15 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bird (1998) ArticleTitle‘Dispositions and Antidotes’ The Philosophical Quarterly 48 227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap (1936) ArticleTitle‘Testability and Meaning’, Part I Philosophy of Science 3 420–471 Occurrence Handle10.1086/286432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Ellis C. Lierse (1994) ArticleTitle‘Dispositional Essentialism’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fales (1990) Causation and Universals Routledge London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Fetzer (1977) ArticleTitle‘A World of Dispositions’ Synthese 34 397–421 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Gundersen (2002) ArticleTitle‘In Defence of the Conditional Account of Dispositions’ Synthese 130 389–411 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014845625688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Lange (1994) ArticleTitle‘Dispositions and Scientific Explanation’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75 108–132

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1973) ArticleTitle‘Causation’ Journal of Philosophy 70 556–567

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1986) Philosophical Papers Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Martin (1993) ‘Power for Realists’ J. Bacon (Eds) Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M Armstrong Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Martin (1994) ArticleTitle‘Dispositions and Conditionals’ The Philosophical Quarterly 44 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Martin (1996) ‘Properties and Dispositions’ T. Crane (Eds) Dispositions: A Debate Routledge London and New York 71–87

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Martin (1997) ArticleTitle‘On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back’ Synthese 112 193–231 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004983524345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Mellor (1974) ArticleTitle‘In Defense of Dispositions’ Philosophical Review 83 157–181

    Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Mellor (1982) ArticleTitle‘Counting Corners Correctly’ Analysis 42 96–97

    Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Mellor (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Semantics and Ontology of Dispositions’ Mind 109 757–780 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/109.436.757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Mumford (1998) Dispositions Oxford University Press Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mumford (1999) ArticleTitle‘Intentionality and the Physical: A New Theory of Disposition Ascription’ The Philosophical Quarterly 49 215–225 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9213.00138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. T. Place (1996) ‘Dispositions as Intentional States’ T. Crane (Eds) Dispositions: A Debate Routledge London and New York 19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Popper (1992) The Logic of Scientific Discovery Routledge London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Prior (1985) Dispositions Aberdeen University Press Aberdeen

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. 1974. Roots of Reference, Open Court.

  • G. Ryle (1949) The Concept of Mind Chicago University Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shoemaker (1980) ‘Causality and Properties’ P. Inwagen Particlevan (Eds) Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor D. Reidel Dordrecht, Boston 109–135

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shoemaker (1983) ‘Properties, Causation, and Projectibility’ L. Cohen M. Hesse (Eds) Aspects of Inductive Logic Oxford University Press Oxford 291–312

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shoemaker (1998) ArticleTitle‘Causal and Metaphysical Necessity’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 59–77 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0114.00050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Swoyer (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Nature of Natural Laws’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 203–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Troy Cross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, T. what is a disposition?. Synthese 144, 321–341 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5857-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5857-2

Keywords

Navigation