Skip to main content
Log in

Are Dispositions Causally Relevant?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether dispositions are causally relevant, we have to get clear about what causal relevance is. Several characteristics of causal relevance have been suggested, including Explanatory Power, Counterfactual Dependence, Lawfullness, Exclusion, Independence, and Minimal Sufficiency. Different accounts will yield different answers about the causal relevance of dispositions. However, accounts of causal relevance that are the most plausible, for independent reasons, render the verdict that dispositions are causally relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Colin Allen (1995) ArticleTitle‘It Isn’t What You Think: A New Idea About Intentional Causation’ Nous 29 IssueID1 115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ned Block (1990) ‘Can the Mind Change the World?’ Boolos George (Eds) Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam Cambridge University Press Cambridge 137–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Ned Block (1995) ‘Causation and Two Kinds of Laws’ MacDonald Cynthia (Eds) Philosophyof Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation Blackwell Cambridge 78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • David Braun (1995) ArticleTitle‘Causally Relevant Properties’ Philosophical Perspectives: AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology 9 447–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Dardis (1993) ArticleTitle‘Sunburn: Independence Conditions on Causal Relevance’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIII IssueID3 577–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald Davidson (1980) Essays on Actions and Events Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick Dretske (1988) Explaining Behavior MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Ehring (1999) ArticleTitle‘Tropeless in Seattle: The Cure for Insomnia’ Analysis 59 IssueID1 19–24 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. D. Ellis (2001) Scientific Essentialism Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerry Fodor (1989) ArticleTitle‘Making Mind Matter More’ Philosophical Topics 27 59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • John Gibbons (2001) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge in Action’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 IssueID3 579–600

    Google Scholar 

  • John Heil A. Mele (1991) ArticleTitle‘Mental Causes’ American Philosophical Quarterly 28 61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock Read Christopher (1993) ArticleTitle‘A Generalized Probabilistic Theory of Causal Relevance’ Synthese 97 335–354 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01064073 Occurrence HandleMR1262829

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Terrence Horgan (1989) ArticleTitle‘Mental Quasation’ Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory 3 47–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Jackson (1995) ArticleTitle‘Essentialism, Mental Properties and Causation’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Jackson Pettit Phillip (1990) ArticleTitle‘Program Explanation: A General Perspective’ Analysis 50 IssueID2 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegwon Kim (1991) ‘Epiphenomenal and Supervenient Causation’ Rosenthal David M. (Eds) The Nature of Mind Oxford University Press New York 257–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegwon Kim (1988) ArticleTitle‘Explanatory Realism, Causal Realism, and Explanatory Exclusion’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy XII 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegwon Kim (1989) ArticleTitle‘Mechanism, Purpose, and Explanatory Exclusion’ Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory 3 77–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegwon Kim (1990) ‘Explanatory Exclusion and the Problem of Mental Causation’ Villaneuva Enrique (Eds) Information, Semantics and Epistemology Blackwell Cambridge 36–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest Lepore Loewer Barry (1987) ArticleTitle‘Mind Matters’ Journal of Philosophy 84 630–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest Lepore Loewer Barry (1989) ArticleTitle‘More on Making Mind Matter’ Philosophical Topics 17 175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, Kirk: 1998, ‘Functionalism, Causation, and Causal Relevance’, Psyche, available from <http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v4/psyche-4-04-ludwig.html>.

  • Cynthia MacDonald MacDonald Graham (1995) ‘How to be Psychologically Relevant’ MacDonald Cynthia (Eds) Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation Blackwell Cambridge 60–77

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin Brian P. (2002). ‘Type Epiphenomenalism, Anomalism, and Causal Priority’. Philosophical Perspectives.

  • Moliere (1935) Le malade imaginaire, comédie-ballet ... avec une notice biographique, une notice littéraire et des notes explicatives par René Vanbourdolle Librairie Hachette Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior W. Elizabeth Pargetter Robert Jackson Frank (1982) ArticleTitle‘Three Theses about Dispositions’ American Philosophical Quarterly 19 IssueID3 251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • David-Hillel Ruben (1994) ArticleTitle‘A Counterfactual Theory of Causal Explanation’ Nous 28 465–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel Segal Sober Elliot (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Causal Efficacy of Content’ Philosophical Studies 63 1–30 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00375995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, Sydney: 1980. ‘Causality and Properties’. in Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, pp. 109–136.

  • Robert Stalnaker (1987) Inquiry MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Yablo (1992) ArticleTitle‘Mental Causation’ The Philosophical Review 101 IssueID2 245–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Mckitrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mckitrick, J. Are Dispositions Causally Relevant?. Synthese 144, 357–371 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5868-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5868-z

Keywords

Navigation