Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laws and Lawlessness

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I develop a metaphysical position that is both lawless and anti-Humean. The position is called realist lawlessness and contrasts with both Humean lawlessness and nomological realism – the claim that there are laws in nature. While the Humean view also allows no laws, realist lawlessness is not Humean because it accepts some necessary connections in nature between distinct properties. Realism about laws, on the other hand, faces a central dilemma. Either laws govern the behaviour of properties from the outside or from the inside. If the former, an unacceptable quidditist view of properties follows. But no plausible account of laws within properties can be developed that permits a governing role specifically for laws. I conclude in favour of eliminativism about laws. At the conceptual core, the notion of a law in nature is misleading. It is suggestive of an otherwise static world in need of animation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.M. Armstrong (1978) A Theory of Universals Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Armstrong (1983) What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Armstrong (1997) A World of States of Affairs Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Armstrong (2003) ‘Truthmakers for Modal Truths’ H. Lillehammer G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (Eds) Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor Routledge London 12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. M. (2004, ‘Combinatorialism Revisited’, in J-M. Monnoyer (ed.), La structure du monde, Vrin, Paris (forthcoming)

  • D.M. Armstrong (2005) ArticleTitle‘Four Disputes about Properties’ Synthese 144 309–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebee H. (2004). ‘What Holds the World Together?’. Synthese (forthcoming).

  • A. Bird (2001) ArticleTitle‘Necessarily, Salt Dissolves in Water’ Analysis. 61 267–274 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bird (2002) ArticleTitle‘On Whether Some Laws are Necessary’ Analysis 62 257–270 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Black (2000) ArticleTitle‘Against Quidditism Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Carroll (1987) ArticleTitle‘Ontology and the Laws of Nature’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Carroll (1994) Laws of Nature Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cartwright (1993) ArticleTitle‘In Defence of “This Worldly” Causality: Comments on van Fraassen’s Laws and Symmetry’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cartwright (1993a) ‘Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental Method’ J. Earman (Eds) Inference, Explanation and Other Philosophical Frustrations University of California Press Los Angeles 44–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1644, Principia Philosophiae, in J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch (trans.), ‘Principles of Philosophy’, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985, pp. 177–291.

  • F. Dretske (1977) ArticleTitle‘Laws of Nature’ Philosophy of Science 44 248–268 Occurrence Handle10.1086/288741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dupré (1993) The Disorder of Things Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Earman (1993) ArticleTitle‘In Defense of Laws: Reflections on Bas van Fraassen’s Laws and Symmetry’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Ellis (2001) Scientific Essentialism Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Ellis (2002) The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism Acumen Chesham

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere (1995) ‘The Sceptical Perspective: Science without Laws of Nature’ F. Weinert (Eds) Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions de Gruyter Berlin 120–138

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere (1999) Science Without Laws University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Honderich (Eds) (1995) The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J Ladyman (2004) ‘The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism’ P. Clark R. Young (Eds) Van Fraassen’s Philosophy of Science Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lange (2000) Natural Laws in Scientific Practice Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1973) Counterfactuals Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1986) On The Plurality of Worlds Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1986) Philosophical Papers, II Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1999) Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (2002, A Survey of Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford Mellor, D. H.: 1977, ‘Natural Kinds’, in D. H. Mellor, Matters of Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, pp. 123–135.

  • D.H. Mellor (1991) Matters of Metaphysics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Mill (1843) A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive Longmans London

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar G. (2003). Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, S. Mumford (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • S. Mumford (1998) Dispositions Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, S. (2004, ‘The Nomological Argument’, Synthésè (forthcoming).

  • Mumford, S. (2004a ‘Filled in Space’, in B. Gnassounou and M. Kistler (eds.), Dispositions et pouvoirs causaux, Vrin, Paris (forthcoming).

  • S. Psillos (2002) Causation and Explanation Acumen Chesham

    Google Scholar 

  • F. P. Ramsey (1928) ‘Universals of Law and of Fact’ H. Mellor (Eds) Philosophical Papers Cambridge University Press Cambridge 140–144

    Google Scholar 

  • F. P. Ramsey (1929) ‘General Propositions and Causality’ H. Mellor (Eds) Philosophical Papers Cambridge University Press Cambridge 145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Roberts (2005) ArticleTitle‘Measurability and Laws of Nature’ Synthese 144 433–447

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ruby (1986) ‘The Origins of Scientific “Law”’ F. Weinert (Eds) Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions de Gruyter Berlin 289–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1980). ‘Causality and Properties’, in Identity, Cause, and Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982

  • P.S. Stevens (1974) Patterns in Nature Penguin London

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Strawson (1989) The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism and David Hume Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Swoyer (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Nature of Natural Laws’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley M. ‘The Nature of Laws’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 667–698.

  • B. Fraassen Particlevan (1989) Laws and Symmetry Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993, ‘Précis of Laws and Symmetry’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53, 411–412.

  • F. Weinert (Eds) (1995) Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical Scientific and Historical Dimensions de Gruyter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University Park Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K

    Stephen Mumford

Authors
  1. Stephen Mumford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Mumford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mumford, S. Laws and Lawlessness. Synthese 144, 397–413 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5873-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5873-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation