Skip to main content
Log in

Yablo’s Paradox and ω-Inconsistency

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that Yablo’s Paradox is not strictly paradoxical, but rather ‘ω-paradoxical’. Under a natural formalization, the list of Yablo sentences may be constructed using a diagonalization argument and can be shown to be ω-inconsistent, but nonetheless consistent. The derivation of an inconsistency requires a uniform fixed-point construction. Moreover, the truth-theoretic disquotational principle required is also uniform, rather than the local disquotational T-scheme. The theory with the local disquotation T-scheme applied to individual sentences from the Yablo list is also consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Forster T. (1996). ‘Yablo’s Paradox’, available at www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~tf/

  • R. Kaye (1991) Models of Peano Arithmetic Oxford University Press Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Priest (1997) ArticleTitle‘Yablo’s Paradox’ Analysis. 57 236–242 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Yablo (1993) ArticleTitle‘Paradox without Self-Reference’ Analysis. 53 251–252

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Ketland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ketland, J. Yablo’s Paradox and ω-Inconsistency. Synthese 145, 295–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6201-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6201-6

Keywords

Navigation