Skip to main content
Log in

The illusion of conscious will

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wegner (Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press) argues that conscious will is an illusion, citing a wide range of empirical evidence. I shall begin by surveying some of his arguments. Many are unsuccessful. But one—an argument from the ubiquity of self-interpretation—is more promising. Yet is suffers from an obvious lacuna, offered by so-called ‘dual process’ theories of reasoning and decision making (Evans, J., & Over, D. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press; Stanovich, K. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum; Frankish, K. (2004). Mind and supermind. Cambridge University Press). I shall argue that this lacuna can be filled by a plausible a priori claim about the causal role of anything deserving to be called ‘a will.’ The result is that there is no such thing as conscious willing: conscious will is, indeed, an illusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. (1968). A materialist theory of the mind. Routledge.

  • Armstrong D. (1984). Consciousness and causality. In: Armstrong D., Malcolm N. (eds) Consciousness and causality. Blackwell

  • Baars, B. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press.

  • Baars, B. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness. Oxford University Press.

  • Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford University Press.

  • Bem D. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review 74: 183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). Academic Press.

  • Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.

  • Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge University Press.

  • Burge T. (1996). Our entitlement to self-knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (Eds.). (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford University Press.

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (Eds.). (1997). Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press.

  • Carruthers, P. (2000). Phenomenal consciousness: A naturalistic theory. Cambridge University Press.

  • Carruthers, P. (2005). Consciousness: Essays from a higher-order perspective. Oxford University Press.

  • Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press.

  • Churchland P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford University Press.

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Papermac.

  • Dennett, D. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. MIT Press.

  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace.

  • Evans, J., & Over, D. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

  • Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. MIT Press.

  • Frankish, K. (2004). Mind and supermind. Cambridge University Press.

  • Gazzaniga, M. (1998). The mind’s past. University of California Press.

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., and the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.

  • Heal J. (1994). Moore’s paradox: A Wittgensteinian approach. Mind 103: 5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1739). A treatise of human nature. Many editions now available.

  • Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel laureate acceptance speech. Available at: http://nobelprize.org/economics/laureates/2002/ kahneman-lecture.html

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis D. (1966). An argument for the identity theory. Journal of Philosophy 63: 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. (1987). Consciousness. MIT Press.

  • Lycan, W. (1996). Consciousness and experience. MIT Press.

  • Malcolm, N. (1984). Consciousness and causality. In D. Armstrong & N. Malcolm (Eds.), Consciousness and causality. Blackwell.

  • Milner, D., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.

  • Moran, R. (2001). Authority and estrangement: An essay on self-knowledge. Princeton University Press.

  • Moshman D. (2004). From inference to reasoning: The construction of rationality. Thinking and Reasoning 10: 221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding of other minds. Oxford University Press.

  • Nisbett R., Wilson T. (1977). Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review 84: 231–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions: How mistakes of reason rule our minds. John Wiley.

  • Pillow B. (2002). Children’s and adult’s evaluation of certainty of deductive inference, inductive inference, and guesses. Child Development 73: 779–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (2003). Seeing and visualizing. MIT Press.

  • Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press.

  • Shoemaker S. (1988). On knowing one’s own mind. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 183–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1990). First-person access. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 187–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J., Shields W., Washburn D. (2003). The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and meta-cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26: 317–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford University Press.

  • Stanovich, K. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. MIT Press.

  • Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press.

  • Wicklund, R., & Brehm, J. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to ourselves. Harvard University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Carruthers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carruthers, P. The illusion of conscious will. Synthese 159, 197–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9204-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9204-7

Keywords

Navigation