Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors for layered coronary plaques: an optical coherence tomography study

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Healed coronary plaques, morphologically characterized by a layered pattern, are signatures of previous plaque disruption and healing. Recent optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies showed that layered plaque is associated with vascular vulnerability. However, factors associated with layered plaques have not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors for layered plaque at the culprit plaques and at non-culprit plaques. Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent pre-intervention OCT imaging of the culprit lesion were included. Layered plaques were defined as plaques with one or more layers of different optical density and a clear demarcation from underlying components. Among 313 patients, layered plaque at the culprit lesion was observed in 18.8% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, 36.3% of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, and 53.4% of stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients (p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, SAP, multivessel disease, type B2/C lesion, and diameter stenosis > 70% were independent predictors for layered plaque at the culprit lesion. In addition, 394 non-culprit plaques in 190 patients were assessed to explore predictors for layered plaques at non-culprit lesions. SAP, and thin-cap fibroatheroma and layered plaque at the culprit lesion were independent predictors for layered plaques at non-culprit lesions. In conclusion, clinical presentation of SAP was a strong predictor for layered plaque at both culprit plaques and non-culprit plaques. Development and biologic significance of layered plaques may be related to a balance between pan-vascular vulnerability and endogenous anti-thrombotic protective mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Partida RA, Libby P, Crea F, Jang IK (2018) Plaque erosion: a new in vivo diagnosis and a potential major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 39:2070–2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuster V, Lewis A (1994) Conner memorial lecture. Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation 90:2126–2146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies MJ (1996) The contribution of thrombosis to the clinical expression of coronary atherosclerosis. Thromb Res 82:1–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2010) Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30:1282–1292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM (2000) Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:1262–1275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann J, Davies MJ (1999) Mechanisms of progression in native coronary artery disease: role of healed plaque disruption. Heart 82:265–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A et al (2001) Healed plaque ruptures and sudden coronary death evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression. Circulation 103:934–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimokado A, Matsuo Y, Kubo T et al (2018) In vivo optical coherence tomography imaging and histopathology of healed coronary plaques. Atherosclerosis 275:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fracassi F, Crea F, Sugiyama T et al (2019) Healed culprit plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:2253–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niccoli G, Stefanini GG, Capodanno D, Crea F, Ambrose JA, Berg R (2013) Are the culprit lesions severely stenotic? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1108–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM et al (1988) Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 78:486–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Otsuka F, Joner M, Prati F, Virmani R, Narula J (2014) Clinical classification of plaque morphology in coronary disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 11:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto MH, Yamashita K, Matsumura M et al (2017) Serial 3-vessel optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound analysis of changing morphologies associated with lesion progression in patients with stable angina pectoris. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e006347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL et al (2002) Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 106:1640–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang C, Hu S, Wu J et al (2019) Characteristics and significance of healed plaques in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina: an in vivo OCT and IVUS study. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo M, Kim HO, Kurihara O et al (2019) Characteristics of non-culprit plaques in acute coronary syndrome patients with layered culprit plaque. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vergallo R, Porto I, D'Amario D et al (2019) Coronary atherosclerotic phenotype and plaque healing in patients with recurrent acute coronary syndromes compared with patients with long-term clinical stability: an in vivo optical coherence tomography study. JAMA Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0275

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arbab-Zadeh A, Fuster V (2015) The myth of the "vulnerable plaque": transitioning from a focus on individual lesions to atherosclerotic disease burden for coronary artery disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:846–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crea F, Liuzzo G (2013) Pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruskal JB, Commerford PJ, Franks JJ, Kirsch RE (1987) Fibrin and fibrinogen-related antigens in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 317:1361–1365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zalewski A, Shi Y, Nardone D et al (1991) Evidence for reduced fibrinolytic activity in unstable angina at rest. Clinical, biochemical, and angiographic correlates. Circulation 83:1685–1691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto H, Kume T, Yamada R et al (2019) Prevalence and clinical significance of layered plaque in patients with stable angina pectoris- evaluation with histopathology and optical coherence tomography. Circ J 83(12):2452–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugiyama T, Yamamoto E, Bryniarski K et al (2018) Nonculprit plaque characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion vs plaque rupture: a 3-Vessel optical coherence tomography study. JAMA Cardiol 3:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jang IK (2017) Plaque progression slow linear or rapid stepwise? Circ Cardiovasc Imag 314:488–500

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haft JI, Haik BJ, Goldstein JE, Brodyn NE (1988) Development of significant coronary artery lesions in areas of minimal disease. A common mechanism for coronary disease progression. Chest 94:731–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD et al (1993) Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1141–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xie Z, Hou J, Yu H et al (2016) Patterns of coronary plaque progression: phasic versus gradual. A combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study. Coron Artery Dis 27:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kato K, Yonetsu T, Kim SJ et al (2012) Nonculprit plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes have more vulnerable features compared with those with non-acute coronary syndromes: a 3-vessel optical coherence tomography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imag 5:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson J, Carson K, Williams H et al (2005) Plaque rupture after short periods of fat feeding in the apolipoprotein E-knockout mouse: model characterization and effects of pravastatin treatment. Circulation 111:1422–1430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen YC, Bui AV, Diesch J et al (2013) A novel mouse model of atherosclerotic plaque instability for drug testing and mechanistic/therapeutic discoveries using gene and microRNA expression profiling. Circ Res 113:252–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ik-Kyung Jang’s research was supported by Mr. Michael and Mrs. Kathryn Park and by Mrs. Gill and Mr. Allan Gray. We are grateful to Iris McNulty, RN (Massachusetts General Hospital) for coordination and editorial work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Taishi Yonetsu or Ik-Kyung Jang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ik-Kyung Jang has received educational grants from Abbott Vascular. They had no role in the design or conduct of this research. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 246 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araki, M., Yonetsu, T., Russo, M. et al. Predictors for layered coronary plaques: an optical coherence tomography study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50, 886–894 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02116-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02116-5

Keywords

Navigation