Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of a simplified model for maximum stress prediction

  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simplified model for rapid estimation of maximum subsurface stress was previously reported by the authors. That model was found to predict the upper bound of the maximum von Mises stress in each layer below any surface with good accuracy. In this work, the model is enhanced by quantifying the difference between the predicted upper bound and the maximum stress for a specific rough surface. This is done by evaluating stress predictions for real rough surfaces, sinusoidal surfaces, ideal textured surfaces, and real rough surfaces with imposed computer generated texture. The difference between the predicted upper bound and the surface-specific maximum stress is found to be related to that surface’s roughness. The origin of this relationship is investigated in terms of apparent contact area. The enhanced simplified model provides an efficient means of estimating maximum stress in rough surface contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martini A., Escoffier B., Wang Q., Liu S.B., Keer L.M., Zhu D., Bujold M. (2006) Tribol. Lett. 23:243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mihailidis A., Bakolas V., Drivakos N. (2001) Wear 249:546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kadiric A., Sayles R.S., Zhou X.B., Ioannides E. (2003) J. Tribol. 125:720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Palasantzas G., De Hosson J.T.M. (2000) Acta Mat. 48:3641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong Z.Q., Komvopoulos K. (2003) J. Tribol 125:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu M.M.H., Bhushan B. (1996) Wear 200:265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tao Q., Lee H.P., Lim S.P. (2001) Wear 249:539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey D.M., Sayles R.S. (1991) J. Tribol. 113:729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lubrecht A.A., Ioannide E. (1991) J Tribol. 113:128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu G., Wang Q., Lin C. (1999) Tribol. Trans. 42:581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao Y.F., Bower A.F., Kim K.S., Lev L., Cheng Y.T. (2006) Wear 261:145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaffar M.J. (1997) Int. J. Mech. Sci. 39:497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson K.L., Greenwood J.A., Higginson J.G. (1985) Int. J. Mech. Sci. 27:383

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Etsion I. (2005) J. Tribol. 127:248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pettersson U., Jacobson S. (2006) Tribol. Int. 39:695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zou M., Cai L., Wang H. (2006) Tribol. Lett. 21:25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu S., Wang Q. (2002) J. Tribol. 124:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu S., Wang Q., Liu G. (2000) Wear 243:101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Eaton Corporation for providing surface digitization, Wayne W. Chen for assistance with plasticity modeling, and to the US National Science Foundation IGERT Program, Office of Naval Research, and Department of Energy for research support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Martini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martini, A., Velter, G., Keer, L.M. et al. Enhancement of a simplified model for maximum stress prediction. Tribol Lett 27, 61–67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9205-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9205-1

Keywords

Navigation