Skip to main content
Log in

The Contact of Elastic Regular Wavy Surfaces Revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We revisit the classic problem of an elastic solid with a two-dimensional wavy surface squeezed against an elastic flat half-space from infinitesimal to full contact. Through extensive numerical calculations and analytic derivations, we discover previously overlooked transition regimes. These are seen in particular in the evolution with applied load of the contact area and perimeter, the mean pressure and the probability density of contact pressure. These transitions are correlated with the contact area shape, which is affected by long range elastic interactions. Our analysis has implications for general random rough surfaces, as similar local transitions occur continuously at detached areas or coalescing contact zones. We show that the probability density of null contact pressures is nonzero at full contact. This might suggest revisiting the conditions necessary for applying Persson’s model at partial contacts and guide the comparisons with numerical simulations. We also address the evaluation of the contact perimeter for discrete geometries and the applicability of Westergaard’s solution for three-dimensional geometries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The original formulation of the FFT algorithm [25] contains some errors. The most relevant is that the solution is shifted in Fourier space by one wave number. For the current and previous studies [30, 31], we use a corrected version of this method, which was validated on many cases.

  2. The nominal contact area is \(A_0=\lambda ^2\) as we carry out our simulations on a surface \(\lambda \times \lambda \) to make use of periodic boundary conditions. In the following, however, due to symmetry, all results will be shown only on a quarter of the simulation domain.

  3. This method is quite similar to the one [25] used in this paper, both are based on the Kalker’s variational formulation [15, 16].

  4. The FFT-based method, which we use, fails to predict accurately the contact area evolution near full contact \(A^{\prime } \gtrapprox 97\,\%\). Thus, to compare with the asymptotic solution near full contact (3), we used a more accurate axisymmetric finite element model with discretization 6,400 points per wavelength (triangles in Fig. 4b).

  5. One can use Ramanujan’s approximation for the perimeter of an ellipse with semi-axes \(a\) and \(b\), \(S\approx \pi (3(a+b)-\sqrt{(3a+b)(a+3b)})\).

  6. See also a discussion in [31].

  7. The term contact perimeter, which is introduced in these references, should not be confused with the contact perimeter employed here. By contact perimeter, the author of [1, 2] understands the number of boundaries between neighboring pixels that form the discrete shape.

  8. We found the closure compactness close to the percolation limit to be \(c_{\mathrm{closure}}\approx 4.04\). Regardless the fact that for “closing gap” regime, the shape of the contact boundary cannot be approximated by a square, its compactness measurement near the percolation limit can be with a good accuracy approximated by \(c\approx 4\).

  9. Hereinafter, the PDF of contact pressure is computed only in contact regions; the integral of the PDF over all contact pressures is equal to one.

  10. We cannot show rigorously that the peak observed in Fig. 10 is a singularity, but we can assume that if at full contact a singularity exists, see Eq. (14), it is probable that it also persists at smaller pressures.

  11. We recall that in this case, the contact pressure is \(p(r)=p_{\max }\sqrt{1-(r/a)^2}\).

  12. Differentiation under the integral sign: \(\frac{\hbox {d}}{\hbox {d}x}\!\!\!\int \limits _{a(x)}^{b(x)}\!\!\!\!f(x,t)\hbox {d}t = \!f(x,b(x))\frac{\hbox {d}b(x)}{\hbox {d}x} - f(x,a(x))\frac{\hbox {d}a(x)}{\hbox {d}x} + \!\!\!\int \limits _{a(x)}^{b(x)} \!\!\frac{\hbox {d}f(x,t)}{\hbox {d}x}\hbox {d}t\).

References

  1. Bribiesca, E.: Measuring 2-D shape compactness using the contact perimeter. Comput. Math. Appl. 33(11), 1–9 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bribiesca, E.: An easy measure of compactness for 2D and 3D shapes. Pattern Recognit. 41(2), 543–554 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bush, A.W., Gibson, R.D., Thomas, T.R.: The elastic contact of a rough surface. Wear 35(1), 87–111 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbone, G., Bottiglione, F.: Asperity contact theories: Do they predict linearity between contact area and load? J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 2555–2572 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dapp, W.B., Lücke, A., Persson, B.N.J., Müser, M.H.: Self-affine elastic contacts: percolation and leakage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 244,301 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dieterich, J.H., Kilgore, B.D.: Imaging surface contacts: power law contact distributions and contact stresses in quartz, calcite, glass and acrylic plastic. Tectonophysics 256(1–4), 219–239 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorsey, G., Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D.: Metal fiber brushes. In: Slade, P.G. (ed.) Electric Contacts: Principles and Applications, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Einzel, D., Panzer, P., Liu, M.: Boundary condition for fluid flow: curved or rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2269–2272 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gielis, J.: A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. Am. J. Bot. 90(3), 333–338 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwood, J.A.: A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261, 191–200 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P.: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 295, 300–319 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyun, S., Robbins, M.O.: Elastic contact between rough surfaces: effect of roughness at large and small wavelengths. Tribol. Int. 40, 1413–1422 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, K., Greenwood, J., Higginson, J.: The contact of elastic regular wavy surfaces. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 27(6), 383–396 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kalker, J.J.: Variational principles of contact elastostatics. J. Inst. Math. Appl. 20, 199–219 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalker, J.J., van Randen, Y.A.: A minimum principle for frictionless elastic contact with application to non Hertzian problems. J. Eng. Math. 6, 193–206 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krithivasan, V., Jackson, R.L.: An analysis of three-dimensional elasto-plastic sinusoidal contact. Tribol. Lett. 27(1), 31–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manners, W., Greenwood, J.A.: Some observations on Persson’s diffusion theory of elastic contact. Wear 261, 600–610 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCool, J.I.: Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear 107(1), 37–60 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nayak, P.R.: Random process model of rough surfaces. J. Lubr. Technol. (ASME) 93, 398–407 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pastewka, L., Robbins, M.O.: Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(9), 3298–3303 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Persson, B.N.J.: Elastoplastic contact between randomly rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 116,101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Persson, B.N.J.: Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3840–3861 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Persson, B.N.J., Bucher, F., Chiaia, B.: Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: comparison of theory with numerical results. Phys. Rev. B 65, 184,106 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanley, H.M., Kato, T.: An FFT-based method for rough surface contact. J. Tribol-T ASME 119, 481–485 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stover, J.C.: Optical Scattering: Measurements and Analysis, 3rd edn. SPIE Press, Bellingham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas, T.R.: Rough Surfaces, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Westergaard, H.M.: Bearing pressures and cracks. J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) 6, 49 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, C., Persson, B.N.J.: Contact mechanics: contact area and interfacial separation from small contact to full contact. J. Phys.-Condens. Matter 20(21), 215,214+ (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yastrebov, V.A., Anciaux, G., Molinari, J.F.: Contact between representative rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 86(3), 035,601(R) (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yastrebov, V.A., Anciaux, G., Molinari, J.F.: From infinitesimal to full contact between rough surfaces: evolution of the contact area (2014) arxiv.1401.3800

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to James A. Greenwood and to anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. GA and JFM greatly acknowledge the financial support from the European Research Council (ERCstg UFO-240332).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladislav A. Yastrebov.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Probability Density Function of a Wavy Surface

To obtain the PDF of the contact pressure for the case of full contact

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{p} = 1+\cos \left( 2\pi x/\lambda \right) \cos \left( 2\pi y/\lambda \right) \end{aligned}$$

we use the following observation. If for a given pressure, we express the iso-pressure curve as \(y=y(x,\tilde{p})\), then the area between two iso-curves \(y(x,\tilde{p})\) and \(y(x,\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p)\) would be proportional to the increment of the probability density of the contact pressure \(P(\tilde{p},\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p)\hbox {d}p\) (see Fig. 12

Fig. 12
figure 12

Schematic figure explaining the computation method for the probability density function of a wavy surface. Iso-pressure curves \(y(x,\tilde{p})\) and \(y(x,\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p)\) at different pressures \(\tilde{p}\), the area between curves is proportional to the probability density increment \(P(\tilde{p},\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p)\hbox {d}p\)

). At the full contact \(\tilde{p} \in [0,2]\). Then, the iso-pressure curve is given by:

$$\begin{aligned} y=\frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\arccos \left( \frac{\tilde{p}-1}{\cos (2\pi x/\lambda )}\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(18)

The area under this curve in the range \(x,y\in [0;\lambda /4]\), i.e., for \(\tilde{p}\in [1;2]\) may be expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} A(\tilde{p}) = \int \limits _{0}^{\frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\arccos (\tilde{p}-1)} \frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\arccos \left( \frac{\tilde{p}-1}{\cos (2\pi x/\lambda )}\right) \,\hbox {d}x \end{aligned}$$
(19)

The differential of the probability density is then

$$\begin{aligned} P(\tilde{p},\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p) \hbox {d}p = \frac{A(\tilde{p})-A(\tilde{p}+\hbox {d}p)}{A_0}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(A_0=\lambda ^2/16\) is the considered area. In the limit \(\hbox {d}p\rightarrow 0\) we obtain

$$ P(\tilde{p}) = -\frac{1}{A_0}\frac{{\hbox{d}}A(\tilde{p})}{{\hbox{d}} {\tilde{p}}} $$

Substituting the integral form (19) in this expression enables us to evaluate this derivative using the differentiation under the integral signFootnote 12

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\hbox{d}}A({\tilde{p}})}{{\hbox{d}}{\tilde{p}}}&= \frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\int \limits _{0}^{\frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\arccos (\tilde{p}-1)} \frac{\hbox {d}x}{\cos (2\pi x/\lambda )\sqrt{1-\frac{(\tilde{p}-1)^2}{\cos ^2(2\pi x/\lambda )}}} \\&= -\frac{\lambda }{2\pi \sqrt{2\tilde{p} -\tilde{p}^2}}\int \limits _{0}^{\frac{\lambda }{2\pi }\arccos (\tilde{p}-1)} \frac{\hbox {d}x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{\sin ^2(2\pi x/\lambda )}{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}}} \\&= -\frac{\lambda ^2}{4\pi ^2\sqrt{2\tilde{p} -\tilde{p}^2}}\int \limits _{0}^{\arccos (\tilde{p}-1)} \frac{d\varphi }{\sqrt{1-\frac{\sin ^2(\varphi )}{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}}} \\&= -\frac{\lambda ^2}{4\pi ^2\sqrt{2\tilde{p} -\tilde{p}^2}}\;{{\mathrm {F}}}\left( \arccos (\tilde{p}-1),\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(20)

where \({\mathrm{F}}(l,k)=\int \limits _0^l 1/\sqrt{1-k^2\sin ^2(\varphi )}\,\hbox {d}\varphi \) is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind. So the probability density of the contact pressure for \(\tilde{p} \in [1;2]\) or equivalently for \(\{x,y\}\in [0;\pi /4]\) is

$$\begin{aligned} P(\tilde{p}) = \frac{4}{\pi ^2}\frac{{\mathrm {F}}\left( \arccos (\tilde{p}-1),1/\sqrt{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}\right) }{\sqrt{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}} \end{aligned}$$

To extend it to a periodic domain \(x,y\in \mathbb R\) and for \(\tilde{p}\in [0;2]\), one needs simply to take the absolute value of the argument in \(\arccos \) and divide the PDF by a factor of two

$$\begin{aligned} P(\tilde{p}) = \frac{2}{\pi ^2}\frac{{\mathrm {F}}\left( \arccos (|1-\tilde{p}|),1/\sqrt{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}\right) }{\sqrt{2\tilde{p} - \tilde{p}^2}} \end{aligned}$$
(21)

This expression is depicted in Fig. 13 and compared with numerically evaluated probability density of a wavy surface computed on the grid of \(2\times 10^8\) equally spaced points in the region \(\{x,y\}\in [0;\pi /4]\) using 500 bins.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Comparison of the analytically evaluated (21) and numerically evaluated (\(2\times 10^8\) grid points per \(\lambda /4\times \lambda /4\) and 500 bins) probability density function of a wavy surface

Appendix 2: Data

In Table 1 some numerical results are presented (pressure, area and perimeter) as well as coefficients of Gielis formula (5) that fit the corresponding area shape.

Table 1 Evolution of the contact area fraction \(A^{\prime }\) and corrected perimeter \(S^{\prime }\) (see Eq. (7)) with increasing pressure \(p^{\prime }=p_0/p^*\); \(q,k,\rho _0\) are the coefficients of Gielis formula (5) that approximate the shape of the contact perimeter, coefficients are found by the least mean error fit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yastrebov, V.A., Anciaux, G. & Molinari, JF. The Contact of Elastic Regular Wavy Surfaces Revisited. Tribol Lett 56, 171–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0395-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0395-z

Keywords

Navigation