Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors and impact of retained fetal membranes on performance of dairy bovines reared under subtropical conditions

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The risk factors and impact of retained fetal membranes (RFM) on productive and reproductive performance of crossbred cattle, Zebu cattle, and Murrah buffalos were evaluated using data spread over 12 years. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors and to quantify their odds ratio (OR). Overall incidence of RFM in crossbred cattle, Zebu cattle, and Murrah buffalos were 26, 16, and 13 %, respectively; and significant risk factors for RFM in crossbred cattle were abortion (OR = 3.9), dead calf (OR = 4.1), dystocia (OR = 4.3), pluriparity (OR = 1.5), and shorter gestation length (OR = 4.3). In Zebu cattle, abortion (OR = 4.0), dead calf (OR = 3.7), dystocia (OR = 3.9), lower birth weight of calf (OR = 1.6), and shorter gestation length (OR = 6.4) were significant risk factors for RFM. In Murrah buffalos, abortion (OR = 19.2), dead calf (OR = 4.4), dystocia (OR = 4.7), pluriparity (OR = 1.7), shorter gestation length (OR = 12.7), and calving during summer season (OR = 1.8) were the risk factors for RFM. Although the occurrence of RFM did not affect fertility parameters, a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in 305-day milk yield and total milk yield was observed in RFM-affected crossbred cattle. Taken together, it may be concluded that increased parity, abnormal calving, and short gestation length were the main risk factors for RFM in dairy bovine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar, D., Ezra, E., 2005. Effects of common calving diseases on milk production in high yielding dairy cows. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 60 (40), 106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Beagley, J. C., Whitman, K. J., Baptiste, K. E., Scherzer, J. 2010. Physiology and treatment of retained fetal membranes in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 24, 261–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boro, P., Kumaresan, A., Singh, A.K., Gupta, D., Kumar, S., Manimaran, A., Mohanty, A.K., Mohanty, T.K., Pathak, R., Attupuram, N.M., Baithalu, R.K., Prasad, S., 2014. Expression of short chain fatty acid receptors and pro-inflammatory cytokines in utero-placental tissues is altered in cows developing retention of fetal membranes. Placenta, 35, 455–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaafar, H.M.A., Shamiah, Sh. M., Shitta, A.A., Ganah, H.A.B.., 2010. Factors affecting retained placenta and its influence on postpartum reproductive performance and milk production in Friesian cows. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 43 (1), 6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, I.K., Kim, I.H., 2005. Risk factors for retained placenta and the effect of retained placenta on the occurrence of postpartum diseases and subsequent reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Science, 6 (1), 53–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafi, E.M., Ahmed, WM., Khadrawy, H.H., ZaBaal, M.M., 2011. An overview on placental retention in farm animals. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 7, 643–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossein-Zadeh, N.G., Ardalan, M., 2011. Cow-specific risk factors for retained placenta, metritis and clinical mastitis in Holstein cows. Veterinary Research Communication, 35, 345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konyves, L., Szenci, O., Jurkovich, V., Tegzes, L., Tirian, A., Solymosi, N., Gyulay, G., Brydl, E., 2009. Risk assessment and consequences of retained placenta for uterine health, reproduction and milk yield in dairy cows. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78, 163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, S.J., 2008. Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: a review. The Veterinary Journal, 176, 102–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed, A.F., Aboud, Q.M., Hassan, M.S., Muhammad, A.Y., 2009. Retained fetal membranes in Friesian-Holstein cows and effect of some treatment methods. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 23 (Supplement I), 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Melendez, P., Gonzalez, G., Benzaquen, M., Risco, C., Archbald, L., 2006. The effect of a monensin controlled-release capsule on the incidence of retained fetal membranes, milk yield and reproductive responses in Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 66, 234–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, I.M., Lewis, G.S., LeBlanc, S., Gilbert, R.O., 2006. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology, 65, 1516–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shivhare, M., Mishra, A. K., Gupta, V. K., 2013. Incidence of pre and postpartum complications in Frieswal cow. International Journal of Agriculture Science and Veterinary Medicine, 1 (3), 6772

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Director and Vice-chancellor of the National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, for providing the facilities and fund for the research project entitled “Studies on indicators of retained fetal membranes and evaluation of preventive or therapeutic regimen for maintaining postpartum fertility in dairy bovines” (Project code: B-25) under which the present experiment was undertaken.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arumugam Kumaresan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, S., Prasad, S., Kumaresan, A. et al. Risk factors and impact of retained fetal membranes on performance of dairy bovines reared under subtropical conditions. Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 285–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0717-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0717-z

Keywords

Navigation