Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The significance of age on success of surgery for patients with varicocele

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of our study was to assess the impact of patient age on sperm characteristics, and hormonal levels following varicocelectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 96 patients with a mean age of 28.1 years (range 18–48), who underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy because of infertility, palpable swelling, or scrotal pain. These groups of patients were categorized into three age groups: group I, 18–25 years old at the time of varicocelectomy (n = 35 [36.5%]); group II, 26–35 years old (n = 43 [44.8%]); and group III, older than 36 years (n = 18 [18.8%]).

Results

Of the 96 patients, 68 attended the initial postoperative visit at 1 month and 96 attended the 6 months follow-up visit. Before surgery, no significant differences were seen among the three groups in sperm concentration, sperm motility and hormonal levels. After ligation, the sperm concentration and motility rates increased in all groups, but no significant differences were seen among the three groups for those parameters (P = 0.235 and P = 0.729, respectively). However, no significant changes in follicle-stimulating hormone, LH, testosterone levels were observed between each group. At sixth month of follow-up, two patients in group II, and a patient in group III, had persistent scrotal pain, and a patient in group I had varicocele recurrence; but no patients had hydrocele formation, evidence of testicular loss or progressive hypotrophy.

Conclusions

The results of our study have shown that age is not a significant factor for outcomes of surgery and subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in all aged patients has a similar high success rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E et al (1999) Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol 9(3):536–545. doi:10.1007/s003300050706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meacham R, Townsend R, Rademacher D et al (1994) The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, grey-scale sonography, and colour Doppler sonography. J Urol 151:1535–1538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zini A, Boman J, Jarvi K et al (2008) Varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced paternal age. Urology 72(1):109–113. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.02.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zorgniotti AW, MacLeod J (1973) Studies in temperature, human semen quality, and varicocele. Fertil Steril 24:854–863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pintus C, Rodriguez Matas MJ et al (2001) Varicocele in pediatric patients: comparative assessment of different therapeutic approaches. Urology 57:154–157. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00859-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaman O, Soygur T, Zumrutbas AE, Resorlu B (2006) Results of microsurcigal subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents. Urology 68(2):410–412. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishıkawa T, Fujisawa M (2005) Effect of age and grade on surgery for patients with varicocele. Urology 65:768–772. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (WHO) (1992) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein M, Dicker AP, Dwosh J et al (1992) Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol 148:1808–1811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein M (2002) Surgical management of male infertility and related scrotal disorders. In: Walsh PC, Retik A, Vughan ED, wein A (eds) Campbels urology, vol 2. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, pp 1532–1589

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma RK, Agarwal A (1996) Role of reactive oxygen species in male infertility. Urology 48:835–850. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00313-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kocakoc E, Serhatlioglu S, Kiris A et al (2003) Color doppler sonographic evaluation of inter-relations between diameter, reflux and flow volume of testicular veins in varicocele. Eur J Radiol 47:251–256. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00182-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B et al (1995) Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril 63:120–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Callam MJ (1994) Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Urol 81:167–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Canales BK, Zapzalka MD, Ercole CJ et al (2005) Prevalance and effect of varicoceles in an elderly population. Urology 66:627–631. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oster J (1971) Varicocele in children and adolescents. An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 5:27–32. doi:10.3109/00365597109133569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrade-Rocha FT (2007) Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of adolescents, adults and older men with varicocele. J Postgrad Med 53:8–13. doi:10.4103/0022-3859.30320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saypol DC (1981) Varicocele. J Androl 2:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tinga DJ, Jager S, Bruijnen CL et al (1984) Factors related to semen improvement and fertility after varicocele operation. Fertil Steril 41:404–410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

    Berkan Reşorlu, Cengiz Kara, Erhan Şahin & Ali Ünsal

Authors
  1. Berkan Reşorlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cengiz Kara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erhan Şahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Ünsal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berkan Reşorlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reşorlu, B., Kara, C., Şahin, E. et al. The significance of age on success of surgery for patients with varicocele. Int Urol Nephrol 42, 351–356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9589-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9589-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation