Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Curriculum of the Borderlands: High School Chicana/o-Latina/o Studies as Sitios y Lengua

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing from a nine-month critical teacher inquiry investigation, this article examines the experiences of eleventh and twelfth grade students who participated in a year-long Chicana/o-Latina/o Studies course in California shortly after the passing of Arizona House Bill 2281 (HB 2281). Through a borderlands analysis, I explore how these students describe their experiences participating in such a course, and in doing so, debunk some of the myths upon which HB 2281 was constructed. I find that these classroom experiences served as sitios y lenguas (decolonizing spaces and discourses; Pérez in The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1998) in which high school students were able to reflect on the ongoing transformation of their social, political, and ethnic identities, and developed a relational ontological base. This article explores the physical and metaphorical borders (Anzaldúa in Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1987) that Chicana/o and Latina/o youth navigate and challenge while simultaneously working for social change in their communities. Lastly, it conveys what we stand to lose if the decolonizing spaces and discourse constructed in Ethnic Studies courses become casualties of xenophobic policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Psydenoums are used to protect the identities of the young people throughout this article.

  2. In this paper I use Raza to connote “a people” with similar social, cultural, and historical experiences tied to oppression. Raza alludes to the solidarity that exists between people who are the products of local and enduring struggles, and thus they respond with intensity to those struggles (Brayboy 2005).

References

  • Acuña, R. (1988). Occupied America (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. D. (1988). The education of Blacks in the South, 1860–1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejarano, C. L. (2005). ¿Que onda? Urban youth culture and border identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayboy, M. J. B. (2005). Climbing up and over the ivy: Examining the experiences of American Indian ivy league graduates. Multidisciplinary perspectives on higher education for the public good. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan: Center for the Study of Higher Education for the Public Good.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. E. (2001). Color-line to borderlands: The matrix of American ethnic studies. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Bernal, D. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Bernal, D., Aleman, E., & Garavito, A. (2009). Latina/o Undergraduate Students Mentoring Latina/o Elementary Students. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 560–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R. (2006). Utilizing cariño in the development of research methodologies. In J. Kincheloe, P. Anderson, K. Rose, D. Griffith, & K. Hayes (Eds.), Urban education: An encyclopedia (pp. 451–460). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elenes, A. (1997). Reclaiming the borderlands: Chicana/o identity, difference, and critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 47(3), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elenes, A., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2010). Latina/o education and the reciprocal relationships between theory and practice: Four theories informed by the experiential knowledge of marginalized communities. In E. G. Murillo, S. A. Villenas, R. Trinidad Galvan, J. Sanchez Munoz, C. Martinez, & M. Machado-Casas (Eds.), Handbook of Latinos and education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 196–223). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinez, F. E. (2006). Haciendo que hacer: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational practices and policies. In D. D. Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 25–38). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, D. J. (1995). Chicana identity matters. In A. Darder (Ed.), Culture and difference: Critical perspectives on the bicultural experience (pp. 41–53). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. M. (2003). Whitestream feminism and the colonialist project: A review of contemporary feminist pedagogy and praxis. Educational Theory, 53(3), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu-Dehart, E. (1993). The history, development, and future of ethnic studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliebard, H. M. (1989). Problems of definition in Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okihiro, G. Y. (1981). Oral history and the writing of ethnic history: A reconnaissance into method and theory. Oral History Review, 9, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okihiro, G. Y., & Tsou, E. (2006). On social formation. Works and Days 47/48, (24)1&2, 69–88.

  • Pérez, E. (1998). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. C. (2012). Tucson’s maiz-based curriculum: MAS-TUSD profundo. Nakum Journal, 2(1), 72–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A., Arce, S., & Cammarota, J. (2009). A barrio pedagogy: Identity, intellectualism, activism, and academic achievement through the evolution of critically compassionate intellectualism. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 12(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldívar-Hull, S. (2000). Feminism on the border: Chicana gender politics and literature. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter, C. (2011). The academic and social value of ethnic studies: A research review. Washington: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tintiangco-Cubales, A., Kiang, P. N., & Museus, S. D. (2010). Praxis and power in the intersections of education. AAPI Nexus: Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders Policy, Practice, and Community, 8(1), v–xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrieta, L. (2009). Working from within: Chicana and chicano activist educators in whitestream schools. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrieta, L., & Méndez Benavídez, L. R. (2007). Community commitment and activist scholarship: Chicana/o professors and the practice of consciousness. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6(3), 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 711–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, P. Q. (2000). Ethnic studies: Issues and approaches. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1995). A people’s history of the United States 1942-present. New York: Harper Perrennial.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Lesley Bartlett, Gilda Ochoa, Lauren Anderson, Ernest Morrell, and Roger Chung for their thoughtful feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cati V. de los Ríos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de los Ríos, C.V. A Curriculum of the Borderlands: High School Chicana/o-Latina/o Studies as Sitios y Lengua . Urban Rev 45, 58–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0224-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0224-3

Keywords

Navigation