Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deriving Reservoir Refill Operating Rules by Using the Proposed DPNS Model

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic programming neural-network simplex (DPNS) model, which is aimed at making some improvements to the dynamic programming neural-network (DPN) model, is proposed and used to derive refill operating rules in reservoir planning and management. The DPNS model consists of three stages. First, the training data set (reservoir optimal sequences of releases) is searched by using the dynamic programming (DP) model to solve the deterministic refill operation problem. Second, with the training data set obtained, the artificial neural network (ANN) model representing the operating rules is trained through back-propagation (BP) algorithm. These two stages construct the standard DPN model. The third stage of DPNS is proposed to refine the operating rules through simulation-based optimization. By choosing maximum the hydropower generation as objective function, a nonlinear programming technique, Simplex method, is used to refine the final output of the DPN model. Both the DPNS and DPN models are used to derive operating rules for the real time refill operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) for the year of 2007. It is shown that the DPNS model can improve not only the probability of refill but also the mean hydropower generation when compare with that of the DPN model. It's recommended that the objective function of ANN approach for deriving refill operating rules should maximize the yield or minimize the loss, which can be computed from reservoir simulation during the refill period, rather than to fit the optimal data set as well as possible. And the derivation of optimal or near-optimal operating rules can be carried out effectively and efficiently using the proposed DPNS model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belew, R., McInerney, J., and Schraudolph, N., 1991, ‘Evolving networks: Using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning’, in Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, C., and Rasmussen, S. (eds.), Artificial Life II, Redwood City, CA. Addison-Wesley, 511–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernon, J. L., Boudousq, V., Rohmer, J. F., Fourcade, M., Zanca, M., Rossi, M., and Mariano-Goulart, D., 2001, ‘A comparative study of Powell's and Downhill Simplex algorithms for a fast multimodal surface matching in brain imaging’, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 25(4), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, N. and Whitlatch, E., 1980, ‘Derivation of monthly reservoir release policies’, Water Resour. Res. 16(6), 987–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere, A., Giuliano, G., Ancarani, A., and Rossi, G., 2002, ‘A neural networks approach for deriving irrigation reservoir operating rules’, Water Resour. Manage. 16(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere, A., Giuliano, G., Nicolosi, V., and Rossi, G., 2003, ‘Optimal short-term operation of a multipurpose reservoir system under limited water supply’, in Bloschl, G., Franks, S., Kumagai, M., Musiake, K., and Rosbjerg, D. (eds.), Water Resources Systems-Hydrological Risk, Management and Development, IAHS Publication, (281), 200–207.

  • Chandramouli, V. and Raman, H., 2001, ‘Multireservoir modeling with dynamic programming and neural networks’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 127(2), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandramouli, V., Kuppusamy, K., and Manikandan, K., 2002, ‘Study on water sharing in a multi-reservoir system using a dynamic programming-neural network model’, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 18(3), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F. and Chen, L., 1998, ‘Real-coded genetic algorithm for rule-based flood control reservoir management’, Water Resour. Manage. 12(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. and Chang, F., 2001, ‘Intelligent control for modelling of real-time reservoir operation’, Hydrol. Processes 15(9), 1621–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., 2003, ‘Real coded genetic algorithm optimization of long term reservoir operation’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 39(5), 1157–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, B. and Burges, S., 1984, ‘Short-term, single, multiple-purpose reservoir operation: Importance of loss functions and forecast errors’, Water Resour. Res. 20(9), 1167–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., 2000, Reservoir Comprehensive and Automatic Control Systems, Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering Press, Wuhan, China, (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Zhang, H., Chen, H., Peng, D., Liu, P., and Pang, B., 2004, ‘Reservoir flood forecasting and control system in China’, Hydrol. Sci. J. 49(6), 959–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasebe, M. and Nagayama, Y., 2002, ‘Reservoir operation using the fuzzy and neural network and fuzzy systems for dam control and operation support’, Adv. Eng. Software 33(5), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Das, A., and Srivastava, D., 1999, ‘Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 125(5), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz, M. and Houck, M., 1982, ‘Annual and monthly reservoir operating rules generated by deterministic optimization’, Water Resour. Res. 18(5), 1337–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz, M. and Houck, H., 1987, ‘Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation’, Water Resour. Bull. 23(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis, D. and Economou, A., 2003, ‘Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems’, Water Resour. Res. 39(6), 1170, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labadie, J., 2004, ‘Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State-of-the-art review’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 130(2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naresh, R. and Sharma, J., 2001, ‘Reservoir operation using a fuzzy and neural system for hydrogeneration scheduling’, Int. J. Syst. Sci. 32(4), 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan, T. and Pundarikanthan, N., 2000, ‘Neural network-based simulation-optimization model for reservoir operation’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 126(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. and Mead, R., 1965, ‘A simplex method for function minimization’, Comput. J. 7(4), 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R. and Loucks, D., 1997, ‘Operating rules for multireservoir systems’, Water Resour. Res. 33(4), 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnambalam, K., Karray, F., and Mousavi, F., 2003, ‘Minimizing variance of reservoir systems operations benefits using soft computing tools’, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 139(2), 451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Z., O'Connell, P. E., Cook, D. J., and Jamieson, D. G., 2001, ‘Deriving robust operating rules for the interim control of the Kirazdere reservoir’, Water Sci. Technol. 43(5), 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, H. and Chandramouli, V., 1996, ‘Deriving a general operating policy for reservoirs using neural network’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 122(5), 342–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., and Williams, R., 1986, ‘Learning representations by back-propagating errors’, Nature 323(9), 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, M., Turgeon, A., Bigras, P., and Duquette, R., 1994, ‘Learning disaggregation technique for the operation of long-term hydroelectric power systems’, Water Resour. Res. 30(11), 3195–3202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S., 1987, ‘The implicit stochastic model for reservoir yield optimization’, Water Resour. Res. 23(12), 2159–2165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S., 1992, ‘Reservoir systems analysis: Closing gap between theory and practice’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 118(3), 262–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinnert, A. and Broughton, J., 1995, ‘Neural networks in computational materials science: Training algorithms’, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 3(3), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurbs, R., 1993, ‘Reservoir-system simulation and optimization models’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 119(4), 445–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L. and O'Connor, K. M., 2000, ‘Analysis of the response surface of the objective function by the optimum parameter curve: How good can the optimum parameter values be?’ J. Hydrol. 234, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L., O'Connor, K., and Guo, S., 2004, ‘Comparison of three updating schemes using artificial neural network in flow forecasting’, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 8(2), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L. and Guo, S., 2004, ‘Effects of the catchment runoff coefficient on the performance of TOPMODEL in rainfall-runoff modeling hydrological processes’, Hydrol. Processes 18(10), 1823–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W., 1985, ‘Reservoir management and operations models: A state-of-the-art review’, Water Resour. Res. 21(12), 1797–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., 1967, ‘Finding reservoir operating rules’, J. Hydraulics Div. 93(6), 297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Guo, S., Zhou, F., Liu, P., Cheng, H., Chen, G., Min, Y., and Yang, W., 2005, ‘Flood forecasting model for Three Gorges Reservoir intervening basin by considering the precipitation prediction’, Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 22(1), 9–12 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenglian Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, P., Guo, S., Xiong, L. et al. Deriving Reservoir Refill Operating Rules by Using the Proposed DPNS Model. Water Resour Manage 20, 337–357 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-0322-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-0322-7

Key words

Navigation