Skip to main content
Log in

Using Real Options Theory to Irrigation Dam Investment Analysis: An Application of Binomial Option Pricing Model

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the utility of the real options approach to irrigation dam investment analysis. The main objective is to show how to calculate the option values of selected options that may be available to managers of irrigation dam investments. The paper provides an empirical application, which compares an irrigation dam investment using the static Net Present Value (NPV) model and the real options approach and shows how it can be adopted to model uncertainty and managerial flexibility in dam management. Four management options are used for the real options approach: an option to delay the investment, an option to enlarge the dam, an option to abandon the dam, and multiple options that evaluated all three options together. All options were evaluated using the binomial option pricing model, where water values are assumed to follow a multiplicative binomial process. The analysis show that although the traditional NPV approach accepted the investment as profitable the option approach provided better results showing that all three options were highly valuable if exercised. When real options are considered, the traditional NPV model for assessing the profitability of a dam investment may fail to provide an adequate decision-making framework because it does not properly value management’s ability to adjust to shocks in the economy, as well as risks and uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amram M, Kulatilaka N (1999) Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey MD, Sporleder TS (2000) The real options approach to evaluating a risky investment by a new generation cooperative: further processing. A paper presented at the annual meetings of NCR-194 research on cooperatives, Las Vegas, NV, December, 12–13

  • Baldwin C, Ruback R (1986) Inflation, uncertainty, and investment. J Finance 41:657–669, (July)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerksund P, Ekern S (1990) Managing investment opportunities under price uncertainty: from ‘last chance’ to wait and see strategies. Financ Manage, 19:65–83, (Autumn)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerksund P, Ekern S (1993) Contingent claims evaluation of mean-reverting cash flows in shipping. In: Trigeorgis L (eds) Real options in capital investment (New contributions), Praeger, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 3:637–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodie Z, Merton RCM (2000) Finance. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Trigeorgis L (2000) Project flexibility, agency, and competition. Oxford University Press, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Schwartz ES (1985) Evaluating natural resource investments. J Bus 58(2):135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr P (1988) The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities. J Finance 43(5):1235–1256, (December)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J, Ross R, Rubinstein M (1979) Option pricing: a simplified approach. J Financ Econ 7(4):71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers M (1991) Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information over time. Rev Econ Stud 58:333–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (1992) Investment and hysteresis. J Econ Perspect 6(1):107–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Pindyck RS (1995) The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Bus Rev 105–115, May–June

  • Elton E, Gruber JMJ (1995) Gruber modern portfolio theory and investment Analysis (5th edn.). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Faustmann M (1849) Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. J Forest Econ 1(1):7–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (1992) Waiting to invest: investment and uncertainty. J Bus 65:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemma A (1993) Case studies on real options. Financ Manage, 22:259–270, (Autumn)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger J (1987) Adding the value of active management into the capital budgeting equation. Midl Corp Financ J 5:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester WC (1984) Today’s options for tomorrow’s growth. Harvard Bus Rev 62:153–160, (March/April)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester WC (1993) Turning growth options into real assets. In: Aggarwal A (eds) Capital budgeting under uncertainty, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka N (1993) The value of flexibility: the case of a dual fuel industrial steam boiler. Financ Manage 22:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka N, Trigeorgis L (1994) The general flexibility to switch: real options revisited. Int J Finance 6:778–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman TA (1998) Investment opportunities as real options: getting started on the numbers. Harvard Bus Rev 51–67, July–August

  • McDonald R, Siegel D (1985) Investment and the valuation of firms when there is an option to shut down. Int Econ Rev 26(2):331–349, (June)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 9:147–176, (November)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott SH, Thompson HE (1996) Uncertainty outlay in time to build problems. Manage Decis Econ 17(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock JL, Siegel DR, Smith JL (1987) Valuing offshore oil properties with option pricing models. Midl Corp Finance J 5:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck R (1988) Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. Am Econ Rev 78:969–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty and investment. J Econ Lit 29:1110–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Price T, Wetzstein M (1999) Irreversible investment decision in perennial crops with yield and price uncertainty. J Agric Resour Econ 24(1):173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, McCardle K (1998) Valuing oil properties: integrating option pricing and decision analysis approaches. Oper Res 46:198–217, (March/April)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourinho O (1979) The option value of reserves of natural resources. working paper no. 94, University of California at Berkeley

  • Trigeorgis L (1993) Real options and interactions with financial flexibility. Financ Manage 22(3):202–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis L (1998) A conceptual options framework for capital budgeting. Adv Futures Options Res 3:145–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis L (1999) Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis L, Mason SP (1987) Valuing managerial flexibility. Midl Corp Finance J 5:14–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasios Michailidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michailidis, A., Mattas, K. Using Real Options Theory to Irrigation Dam Investment Analysis: An Application of Binomial Option Pricing Model. Water Resour Manage 21, 1717–1733 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9122-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9122-3

Key words

Navigation