Skip to main content
Log in

Small Amplitude Sharp Pressure Waves to Diagnose Pipe Systems

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the possibility of using transient tests, generated by the Portable Pressure Wave Maker (PPWM) device, as a powerful tool in the management of pipe systems, is demonstrated. Specifically, tests carried out in different experimental set-ups at the Water Engineering Laboratory of the University of Perugia, Italy show that small amplitude sharp pressure waves produced by the PPWM allow to locate and evaluate the entity of anomalies, such as leaks, illegal branches, partial blockages, and negligently partially closed in-line valves. To improve the precision of localization of anomalies, arrival times of pressure waves are detected by means of wavelet analysis. Simple relations based on the water hammer theory are proposed to evaluate the entity of the anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shidhani I, Beck SBM, Staszewsky WJ (2003) Leak monitoring in pipeline networks using wavelet analysis. Key Eng Mater 245–246:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berni A, Brunone B, Ferrante M (2005) A 2-d approach for energy dissipation evaluation in pressurised transient flow. In: Proc 8th int conf on ’computing and control for the water industry—CCWI 2005’, Exeter (UK), vol 1, pp 287–292

  • Brunone B (1999) Transient test-based technique for leak detection in outfall pipes. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 125(5):302–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunone B, Berni A (2010) Wall shear stress in transient turbulent pipe flow by local velocity measurement. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 31/03/2010. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000234

  • Brunone B, Ferrante M (2001) Detecting leaks in pressurised pipes by means of transients. J Hydraul Res IAHR 39(5):539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunone B, Ferrante M, Meniconi S (2008a) Discussion of “Detection of partial blockage in single pipelines” by PK Mohapatra, MH Chaudhry, AA Kassem, and J Moloo. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 134(6):872–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunone B, Ferrante M, Meniconi S (2008b) Portable pressure wave-maker for leak detection and pipe system characterization. J Am Water Works Assoc AWWA 100(4):108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunone B, Karney BW, Mecarelli M, Ferrante M (2000) Velocity profiles and unsteady pipe friction in transient flow. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 126(4):236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou S, Deligianni A (2010) A neurofuzzy decision framework for the management of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 24:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AF, Karney BW (2002) Energy and costs of leaky pipes: toward comprehensive picture. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 128(6):441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor DN (1965) The reflection of waterhammer pressure waves from minor losses. J Basic Eng ASME 445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoho D (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41(3):613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 2. Wavelet analysis. Adv Water Resour 26(1):1274–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2007) Wavelets for the analysis of transient pressure signals for leak detection. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 133(11):1274–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2009a) Leak detection in branched pipe systems coupling wavelet analysis and a Lagrangian model. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 58(2):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B, Meniconi S (2009b) Leak-edge detection. J Hydraul Res IAHR 47(2):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson L, Larson M (1992) Leak detection through hydraulic transient analysis. In: Proc int conf on ’pipeline systems’, Manchester (UK), pp 273–286

  • Jun H, Loganathan GV, Kim JH, Park S (2008) Identifying pipes and valves of high importance for efficient operation and maintenance of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manage 22:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapelan Z, Savic DA, Walters GA (2003) A hybrid inverse transient model for leakage detection and roughness calibration in pipe networks. J Hydraul Res IAHR 41(3):481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeChevallier M (1990) Coliform regrowth in drinking water: a review. J Am Water Works Assoc AWWA 82(11):74–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Liggett J, Chen LC (1994) Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 120(8):934–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S, Hwang W (1992) Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38:617–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S, Zhong S (1992) Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(7):710–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misiunas D, Vitkovsky JP, Olsson G, Simpson AR, Lambert MF (2005) Pipeline break detection using pressure transient monitoring. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 131(4):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra PK, Chaudhry MH, Kassem AA, Moloo J (2006) Detection of a partial blockages in a branched piping system by the frequency response method. J Fluids Eng ASME 128:1106–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash GA, Karney BW (1999) Efficient inverse transient analysis in series pipe systems. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 125(7):761–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos H, Louriero D, Lopes A, Fernandes C, Covas D, Reis LF, Cuhna MC (2010) Evaluation of chlorine decay in drinking water systems for different flow conditions: from theory to practice. Water Resour Manage 24:815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattar AM, Chaudhry MH, Kassem AA (2008) Partial blockage detection in pipelines by frequency response method. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 134(1):76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaffield J, Boldy A (1993) Pressure surges in pipe and duct systems. Ashgate, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Lambert MF, Simpson AR (2005) Detection and location of a partial blockage in a pipeline using damping of fluid transients. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 131(3):244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Liggett J, Vitkovsky JP (2002) Leak detection in pipelines using the damping of fluid transients. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 128(7):697–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemetz JC (2000) DOP1000 application notes. Signal Processing S.A., Lausanne

  • Wylie E, Streeter V (1993) Fluid transients in systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Meniconi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meniconi, S., Brunone, B., Ferrante, M. et al. Small Amplitude Sharp Pressure Waves to Diagnose Pipe Systems. Water Resour Manage 25, 79–96 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9688-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9688-7

Keywords

Navigation