Skip to main content
Log in

A GIS-Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Approach for Flood Risk Assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floods, the most common natural hazard in the world, cause serious loss in terms of lives, buildings, and infrastructures. As a consequence, the need for flood risk assessment has become critical. Using a semi-quantitative model and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) weighting approach, this paper assessed flood risk in the Dongting Lake region, Hunan Province, Central China, an area where flood hazards frequently occur. The model was designed using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA) techniques in a Geographic Information System (GIS). A GIS database of indicators for the evaluation of hazard and vulnerability was created. Each indicator was analyzed, standardized, and weighted; after which, the weights of the indicators were combined to obtain the final flood risk index map. Using the flood risk index, the study area was classified into five categories of flood risk: very low, low, medium, high, and very high. The high and very high risk zones are mainly concentrated in the northern and central plains. The results obtained can provide useful information for decision makers and insurance companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselmo V, Galeati G, Palmieri S, Rossi U, Todini E (1996) Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modeling approach: a case study. J Hydrol 175:533–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in Kakuda-Yahiko mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis—an integrated approach. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke PH, Marshal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng XT, Yang L, Chen XJ (1996) Numerical model of flood propagation in detention basin. J Nat Disasters 5(1):34–40, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia FN, Rego FC, Saraiva MG, Ramos I (1998) Coupling GIS with hydrologic and hydraulic flood modelling. Water Resour Manag 12:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton D, Mounsey C (1997) How the insurance industry will use its flood research. In: Proceeding of the Third MAFF Conference of Coastal and River Engineers 131–134

  • Deng H (1999) Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. Int J Approx Reason 21:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Islam MM, Kumamoto T, Nishigaki M (2007) Evaluating flood hazard for land-use planning in Greater Dhaka of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Water Resour Manag 21:1601–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, He F, Shi PJ (2006) Integrated flood risk assessment of Xiangjiang River Basin in China. J Nat Disasters 15(6):38–44, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • EM-DAT (2006) Disaster profile for floods. EM-DAT: international disaster database. http://www.em-dat.net/disaster/profiles.php. Accessed 26 Oct 2006

  • Ertugrul I, Tus A (2007) Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile firm. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 6:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furdada G, Calderon LE, Marques MA (2008) Flood hazard map of La Trinidad (NW Nicaragua). Method and results. Nat Hazards 45:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Hargitt D, Hoyois P (2004) Thirty years of natural disster 1974–2003: the numbers. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He BY, Zhang HL, Zhang S, Ding GP (2002) GIS-based risk evaluation for flood disaster in Hubei province. J Nat Disasters 11(4):84–89, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • He BY, Zhang H, Du Y, Zhongshan YZ, Li B (2004) Flood risk assessment of Hubei province. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 21(3):21–25, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang MS, Huang CC (2007) Research on grade model of flood risk assessment. J Catastrophology 22(1):1–5, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunan Province Statistical Bureau (2004) Hunan province statistical yearbook 2004. China Statistics, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydraulic Committee of the Changjiang River (1999) Atlas of the Changjing River Basin. China Map, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R (2001) On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environment impact assessment in the Netherlands. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 10:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag 16(6):382–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives—preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphe method: techniques and applications. Addison Wesley Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao DH (2001) Comprehensive assessment and analysis on the risk degree of flood-waterlogging in Dongting Lake region. J Nat Disasters 10(4):104–107, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskrey A (1989) Disaster mitigation: a community based approach. Oxford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer V, Scheuer S, Haase D (2008) A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Natural Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9244-4

  • Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment—theory and application in ecological economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1983) Axiomatic foundations of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 32:841–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas GL (2001) Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal J, Lu XX (2004) Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon Asia: a review. Natural Hazards 33:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi PJ (1996) Theory and practice of disaster study. J Nat Disasters 5(4):6–17, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi PJ (2003) Natural hazard atlas of China. Science, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Nirupama N (2005) A spatial multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty for water resources management. J Hydrol 7(2):117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Soerensen PB, Glydenkaerne S, Lerche D et al (2004) Probability approach applied for prioritization using multiple criteria. In: Soerensen (ed) Order theory in environment science. NERI Report 479

  • Su BD, Jiang T, Guo YY et al (2005) GIS raster data-based dynamic flood risk simulation model and its application. J Hehai Univ (Nat Sci) 33(4):370–374, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Zhu J (2005) A GIS based regional torrent risk zonation. Acta Geograph Sin 60(1):87–94, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Thinh NX, Vogel R (2006) GIS-based multiple criteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment in the content of flood risk management. InterCarto-InterGIS 12, Berlin

  • Tkach RJ, Simonovic SP (1997) A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 1(1):25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Toraichi K, Yang K, Kamada M, Mori R (1988) Two-dimensional spline interpolation for image reconstruction. Pattern Recogn 21(3):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United National Development Program (2004a) Human development report 2004. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United National Development Program (2004b) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herwijnen M (1999) Spatial decision support for environmental management. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit

  • Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Q et al (1999) Analysis and evaluation for flood disaster system. Science, Beijing, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Wang KL, Xiong Y, Xu LF, Yang XL (2003) Assessment of the vulnerability of flood-waterlogging disaster and countermeasures of disaster reduction in Hunan province. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 12(6):586–592, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner M (2004) Spatial flood extent modelling: a performance-based comparison. Delft University Press, Delft. http://www.wldelft.nl/rnd/publ/docs/We_2004a.pdf

  • Whalen TM, Savage GT, Jeong GD (2002) The method of self-determined probability weighted moments revisited. J Hydrol 268:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang WS, Li WH (2001) Spatial-temporal distribution of food and water-logging disaster in Dongting Lake area and control strategies. Chin J Ecol 20(2):48–51, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan XG, Zhu GR, Wen YY (2003) Risk evaluation for flood disasters in the plain area based on GIS. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 12(4):388–392, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Xu XM (2002) Test on L-moment estimation method for GEV and P-III Distribution in regional flood frequency analysis. Hydrology 22(6):36–38, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wan Q, Zhang JQ et al. (2003) The method of flood disaster risk evaluation based upon data of grid square. Geo-information Science (4): 69–73 (in Chinese)

  • Zhang H, Zhang JQ, Han JS (2005) GIS-based assessment and zoning of flood/waterlogging disaster risk: a case study on middle and lower reaches of Liaohe River. J Nat Disasters 14(6):141–146, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CH, Wan Q, Huang SF (2000) A GIS-based approach to flood risk zonation. Acta Geograph Sin 55(1):15–24, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YC (2005) A century of floods. Chapter 13 (in Chinese). http://www.nsbd.com.cn/NewsDisplay.asp?Id=123109. Accessed 26 July 2007

  • Zimmermann HJ, Gutsche L (1991) Multi-criteria analyse—Einführung in die Theorie der Entscheidungen bei Mehrfachzielsetzungen. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40971170, 51039001), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-09-330), and the National 863 High Technologies Research of China (Grant No.2007AA10Z222).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongwu Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Li, Z., Tang, Z. et al. A GIS-Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Approach for Flood Risk Assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China. Water Resour Manage 25, 3465–3484 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9866-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9866-2

Keywords

Navigation