Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Appreciating Institutional Complexity in Water Governance Dynamics: A Case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water managing systems are becoming more complex as new institutional arrangements are created in response to a changing climate. Our inquiry centred on the ‘water managing system’ within a nested set of Australian water governance regimes, including relevant local, regional, state and national governance regimes. New institutions in national and state systems, seemingly intended to reduce complexity through centralisation or integration, only increase complexity by adding to the existing mix of institutional arrangements. This complexity can reduce the effectiveness of water managing organisations by increasing administrative burden, creating high costs of entry for new staff and leading to confusion in communications with external stakeholders. Regional water managers deal with this complexity by drawing on relational capital built from long-term engagement in the water managing system. However, relational capital is difficult to build and easy to destroy, thus this ‘soft’ capacity is under threat from shifts in decision making power and of resources out of regional water governance systems. Institutional innovation is therefore required to create opportunities to build relational capital in order to effectively manage natural resources at the regional level as coupled socio-ecological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan C (2008) Can adaptive management help us embrace the Murray-Darling Basin’s wicked problems? In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • APSC (2007) Tackling wicked problems. A public policy perspective. Australian Public Service Commission, Australian Government, Canberra.

  • Bellamy JA (2007) Adaptive governance: the challenge for regional natural resource management. In: Brown AJ, Bellamy JA (eds) Federalism and regionalism in Australia new approaches, new institutions? ANU ePress, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann BT, Stankey GH (2009) Crisis as a positive role in implementing adaptive management after the Biscuit fire, Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. In: Allan C, Stankey GH (eds) Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner’s guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 143–167

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin C, Mautner N, Dibden J (2007) Public policy, private landholders: perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management. J Environ Manage 85:986–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey B, Major A (2005) Towards more integrated natural resource management in Victoria: possible elements of an integrated state-wide policy framework. Australas J Environ Manage 12:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins KB, Ison RL (2010) Trusting emergence: some experiences of learning about integrated catchment science with the Environment Agency of England and Wales. Water Resour Manage 24:669–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins K, Blackmore C, Morris D, Watson D (2007) A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environ Sci Pol 10:564–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S (2010) Institutional change and water policy. Background paper prepared for the National Water Commission, April 2010. National Water Commission, Canberra.

  • Farrelly M (2005) Regionalisation of environmental management: a case study of the Natural Heritage Trust, South Australia. Geogr Res 43:393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godden L, Ison RL (2010) From water supply to water governance. In: Davis M, Lyons M (eds) More than luck. Ideas Australia needs now. Centre for Policy Development, Sydney, pp 177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2008) Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3:101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL (2007) Water politics: new plan—same old thinking. The New Matilda Magazine, Wednesday 7 February 2007, http://newmatilda.com/2007/02/07/new-plan-%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%80%9D-same-old-thinking

  • Ison RL (2010a) Systems practice: how to act in a climate change world. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL (2010b) Governance that works. Why public service reform needs systems thinking. In: Davis M, Lyons M (eds) More than luck. Ideas Australia needs now. Centre for Policy Development, Sydney, pp 215–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Wallis P (2009) Submission to the advisory group on the reform of Australian government administration. http://bit.ly/eCg2iq. Accessed 30 March 2011.

  • Ison RL, Wallis P (2011) Planning as performance. The Murray-Darling basin plan. In: Grafton Q, Connell D (eds) Basin futures: water reform in the Murray-Darling basin. ANU ePress, Canberra, pp 399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R, Röling N, Watson D (2007) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Pol 10:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Russell DB, Wallis P (2009) Adaptive water governance and systemic thinking for future NRM—action research to build MDBA capability. Monash Sustainability Institute Report 09/4, Monash University, Clayton.

  • Ison RL, Collins KB, Colvin JC, Jiggins J, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G, Steyaert P, Zanolla C (2011) Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resour Manage (Special Issue). doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9880-4

  • Lane MB, Robinson CJ (2009) Institutional complexity and environmental management: the challenge of integration and the promise of large-scale collaboration. Australas J Environ Manage 16:16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam R, Drinan J, Inall N, McKenzie J (2004) Growing the capital of rural Australia (Renamed from Institutional Arrangements to support Extension). Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Report No: RUE-2A, Canberra.

  • McClintock D, Ison R, Armson R (2003) Metaphors for reflecting on research practice: researching with people. J Environ Plan Manage 46:715–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock D, Ison RL, Armson R (2004) Conceptual metaphors: a review with implications for human understandings and systems practice. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 11:25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Moglia M, Cook S, Sharma AK, Burn S (2011) Assessing decentralised water solutions: towards a framework for adaptive learning. Water Resour Manage 25:217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison TH (2006) Pursuing rural sustainability at the regional level: key lessons from the literature on institutions, integration, and the environment. J Plan Lit 21:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • NWC (2009) Australian water reform 2009. Second biennial assessment of progress in implementation of the National Water Initiative. National Water Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage 34:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RCEP (2010) Adapting institutions to climate change. Summary Report. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London.

  • Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Pol Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007a) Community-based NRM boards of management: are they up to the task? Australas J Environ Manag 14:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007b) NRM regions in Australia: the ‘Haves’ and the ‘Have Nots’. Geogr Res 45:273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Kanowski P (2011) ‘Crying for our Country’: eight ways in which ‘Caring for our Country’ has undermined Australia’s regional model for natural resource management. Australas J Environ Manag (in press).

  • Russell D, Ison R (2005) The researcher of human systems is both choreographer and chorographer. Syst Res Behav Sci 22:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlindwein S, Ison R (2005) Human knowing and perceived complexity: implications for systems practice. Emergence: Complexity & Organization (E:CO) 6, (3) 19–24.

  • SLIM (2004) SLIM Policy Briefing 3: developing conducive and enabling institutions for concerted action. Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale. http://slim.open.ac.uk. Accessed 30 March 2011.

  • The Open University (2006) Techniques for environmental decision making. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists (2011) House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia. Impact of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan on Regional Australia, Hansard, Wednesday, 2 March, Canberra, RA 24–RA 37.

  • Woodhill J (1996) Natural resources decision making: beyond the landcare paradox. Australas J Nat Resour Law Pol 3:91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill J (2008) Shaping behaviour—how institutions evolve. Broker 10:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill J (2010) Capacities for institutional innovation: a complexity perspective. IDS Bull 41:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash Sustainability Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Philip J. Wallis

  2. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Raymond L. Ison

  3. Communication & Systems Department, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Raymond L. Ison

Authors
  1. Philip J. Wallis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raymond L. Ison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip J. Wallis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallis, P.J., Ison, R.L. Appreciating Institutional Complexity in Water Governance Dynamics: A Case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour Manage 25, 4081–4097 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9885-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9885-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation