Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncertainty Analysis of Looped Water Distribution Networks Using Linked EPANET-GA Method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydraulic analysis of water distribution network is generally done by the conventional method. The obtained results such as pipe discharges, hydraulic gradient level of nodes, nodal concentrations etc., are normally crisp values assuming crisp input parameters. But, in real networks, there are many uncertainties in nodal demands, roughness, length, diameters of pipes, valve operations, water levels in reservoirs, head-discharge characteristics of pumps, etc. The results obtained by the conventional method may not be satisfactory in practice. Hence, in this study, an attempt is made to consider pipe roughness as uncertain parameter and to evaluate the pipe discharges and nodal hydraulic gradient levels accordingly. The Genetic Algorithm Optimization based methodology has been used to obtain the unknown parameters at each α-cut level. The hydraulic simulations are done by using EPANET 2 in MATLAB environment. The maximum and minimum values of pipe discharges and nodal hydraulic gradient levels are obtained in each simulation run. The results show that the required time to run the simulation is same for all networks irrespective of the size after adopting a particular Genetic Algorithm parameters tuning. The obtained results are compared with past studies and it is found that present method is effective in analyzing the uncertainty problem, particularly for large scale networks. The results of pipe discharges are found to vary at 30, 48.3, 58 and 9 % and of the hydraulic heads at nodes at 3.17 m, 4.3 m, 2.2 m and 12.64 m for the selected problems taken from the literature. This study would help to analyze the pipe network under the conditions of uncertainty in input parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alperovits E, Shamir U (1977) Design of optimal water distribution systems. Water Resour Res 13(6):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu KSJ, Vijayalakshmi DP (2013) Self-adaptive PSO-GA hybrid model for combinatorial water distribution network design. J Pipeline Syst Eng Practice 4(1):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow E, Tanyimboh TT (2014) Multiobjective memetic algorithm applied to the optimisation of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28:2229–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave PR, Gupta R (2004) Optimal design of water distribution networks for fuzzy demands. Civil Eng Environ Sys 21(4):229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave PR, Gupta R (2006) Analysis of water distribution networks. Narosa Publishing Pvt, Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha MC, Sousa J (1999) Water distribution network design optimization: simulated annealing approach. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125(4):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2000) An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186:311–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong W, Shah HC (1987) Vertex methods for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou C, Woldt W, Bogardi I, Dahab M (1995) Steady state groundwater flow simulation with imprecise parameters. Water Resour Res 31(11):2709–2719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou C, Woldt W, Dahab M, Bogardi I (1997a) Transient groundwater flow simulation using fuzzy set method. Ground Water 35(2):205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou C, Woldt W, Bogardi I, Dahab M (1997b) Numerical solute transport simulation using fuzzy sets method. J Contam Hydrol 27:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eusuff MM, Lansey KE (2003) Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(3):210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freissinet C, Vauclin M, Erlich M (1999) Comparison of first order analysis and fuzzy set method for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model. J Contam Hydrol 37:21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara O, Khang DB (1990) A two-phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resour Res 26(4):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW, Cho Y (2011) Optimal design of water networks using parameter-setting-free harmony search for two major parameters. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(4):377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Kuo CH (1987) Genetic algorithm in pipeline optimization. J Comput Civ Eng 1(2):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Aral MM (2004) Optimal design of groundwater remediation systems using fuzzy set theory. Water Resour Res 40(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Aral MM (2005) Remediation system design with multiple uncertain parameters using fuzzy sets and genetic algorithm. J Hydrol Eng 10(5):386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Bhave PR (2007) Fuzzy parameters in pipe network analysis. Civil Eng Environ Syst 24(1):33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaption in natural and artificial systems. Univ of Michigan Press, An Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadu MS, Gupta R, Bhave PR (2008) Optimal design of water networks using a modified genetic algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keedwell E, Khu S (2005) A hybrid genetic algorithm for the design of water distribution nerworks. Eng Appl Artif Intell 18:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong SY, Atiquzzaman M (2004) Optimal design of water distribution network using shuffled complex evolution. J Inst Eng 44(1):93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchi E, Rubatta A (1981) Fluid mechanics. UTET, Torino(in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques J, Cunha M, Savic D (2014) Using real options in the optimal design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000448

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows ME, Walski TM, Barnard TE, Durrans SR (2002) Computer applications in hydraulic engineering. Haestad Methods Inc., Waterbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S, Babu KSJ (2009) Water distribution network design using heuristics-based algorithm. J Comput Civ Eng 23(5):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S, Babu KSJ (2010) Optimal water distribution network design with honey-bee mating optimization. J Comput Civ Eng 24(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora-Melia D, Iglesias-Rey PL, Martinez-Solano FJ, Ballesteros-Perez P (2015) Efficiency of evolutionary algorithms in water network pipe sizing. Water Resour Manag 29:4817–4831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad RK, Mathur S (2007) Groundwater flow and contaminant transport simulation with imprecise parametrers. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(1):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan SD, Nguyen DT (2004) Design optimization of discrete structural systems using MPI-enabled genetic algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2002) Fuzzy method for analysis of pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng 128(1):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross TJ (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2000a) EPANET 2 users manual. Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2000b) EPANET 2 programmer’s toolkit manual. Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic DA, Walters GA (1997) Genetic algorithms for least cost design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123(32):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savic DA, Kapelan ZS, Jonkergouw PMR (2009) Quo Vadis water distribution model calibration ? Urban Water J 6(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibu A, Reddy J (2011) Uncertainty analysis of water distribution networks by fuzzy-cross entropy method. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 59:724–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpsons AR, Dandy GC, Murphy LJ (1994) Genetic algorithms compared to other techniques for pipe optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120(4):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RM (2013) Uncertainty characterization in the design of flow diversion structure profiles using genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(2):145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar P, Prasad RK, Chandramouli S, Majumder S (2014) Uncertainty analysis of water distribution networks using linked EPANET-vertex method. IJIRSET 3(12):17900–17911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SA, Krishnamurthy T, Mason BH (2002) American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1–12

  • Sung Y, Lin M, Lin Y, Liu Y (2007) Tabu search solution of water distribution network optimization. J Environ Eng Manag 17(3):177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Suribabu CR (2010) Differential evolution algorithm for optimal design of water distribution networks. J Hydroinformatics 12(1):66–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suribabu CR, Neelakantan TR (2006) Particle swarm optimization compared to other heuristic search techniques for pipe sizing. J Environ Inform 8(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E, Plilati S (1987) A gradient method for the analysis of pipe networks. International Conference on Computer Application for Water Supply and Distribution. Leicester Polytechnic, UK

  • Wu ZY, Simpson AR (2001) Competent genetic-evolutionary optimization of water distribution systems. J Comput Civ Eng 15(2):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Goulder IC (1999) Optimal design of water distribution networks using fuzzy optimization. Civil Eng Environ Syst 16(4):243–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zecchin AC, Maier HR, Simpson AR (2007) Analysis of ACO applied to optimal design of water distribution systems. In: Chan FTS, Tiwari MK (eds) Swarm intelligence: Focus on ant and particle swarm optimization. Itech Education and Publishing, Vienna, p. 532

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng F, Simpson AR, Zecchin AC (2011) A combined NLP differential evolution algorithm approach for the optimization of looped water distribution systems. Water Resour Res 47(8):W08531

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their critical reviews and constructive comments that substantially improved the quality of the paper further.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P . Sivakumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivakumar, P..., Prasad, R.K. & Chandramouli, S. Uncertainty Analysis of Looped Water Distribution Networks Using Linked EPANET-GA Method. Water Resour Manage 30, 331–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1165-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1165-x

Keywords

Navigation