Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Lightweight Mesh and Its Comparison with ZigBee Pro Technology

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As there is a rising demand on energy efficiency the proper network stack is an essential for every wireless sensor network application. This paper gives a comprehensive view on performance comparison of \(\hbox {Atmel}^{\circledR }\) Lightweight Mesh (LWM) and ZigBee Pro technology based on extensive real measurements. We focused mainly on application layer throughput, routing latency and self-healing capability. Although the LWM clearly outperforms ZigBee Pro in most aspects, the LWM has particular drawbacks. Particularly, the LWM provides smaller footprint and faster stack processing along with higher application throughput. The most notable throughput difference where the LWM outperforms the BitCloud was by as much as thirteen times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SensLAB, Available: http://www.senslab.info.

  2. Memsic, Iris, Available: http://www.memsic.com/.

  3. Atmel Bitcloud ZigBee PRO, Available: http://www.atmel.com.

  4. Chanalyzer: Available: http://www.metageek.net/.

  5. Open ZigBee Sniffer, Available: http://www.sniffer.wislab.cz.

References

  1. Atmel Corporation, Atmel AVR2130: Lightweight mesh developer guide, Application note. http://www.atmel.com/tools/LIGHTWEIGHT_MESH.aspx?tab=documents. Accessed April 10, 2013.

  2. Hammoodi, I. S., Stewart, B. G., Kocian, A., & McMeekin, S. G. (2009). A comprehensive performance study of OPNET modeler for ZigBee wireless sensor networks. In Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, 2009. NGMAST ‘09, pp. 357–362, 15–18 September 2009.

  3. Nefzi, B., & Song, Y.-Q. (2007) Performance analysis and improvement of ZigBee routing protocol. In 7th IFAC international conference on fieldbuses & networks in industrial & embedded systems, 2007.

  4. Weiye, T., & Jieqiong, Z. (2011) The performance study of ZigBee mesh network. In Communication software and networks (ICCSN), pp. 407–409, 27–29 May 2011.

  5. Li, J., Zhu, X., Tang, N., & Sui, J. (2010) Study on ZigBee network architecture and routing algorithm. In Signal processing systems (ICSPS), July 2010.

  6. Lingyun, Y., & Xingchao, W. (2009). Study on performance evaluation method based on measurement for wireless sensor network. In Communications technology and applications, 2009. ICCTA ’09. IEEE International Conference on, Vol., no., pp. 201,206, October 16–18, 2009.

  7. Camillo, A., & Petrioli, C. (2012) Hands on IRIS: Lessons learned from implementing a cross layer protocol stack for WSNs. In Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2012 IEEE, vol., no., pp. 157,163, December 3–7, 2012.

  8. Fernández-lópez, H., Correia, J. H., Ricardo, S., & Afonso, J. A. (2010) Experimental evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee for multi-patient ECG monitoring. In ICST conference on electronic healthcare for the 21st century, 2010.

  9. Petrova, M., Riihijarvi, J., Mahonen, P., & Labella, S. (2006) Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations. In Wireless communications and networking conference, 2006. WCNC 2006. IEEE, vol. 1, no., pp. 487,492, April 3–6, 2006.

  10. Lee, J.-S., & Wang, Y.-M. (2013) Experimental evaluation of ZigBee-based wireless networks in indoor environments. Journal of Engineering, Vol. 2013, Article ID 286367, 2013.

  11. Lee, J.-S. (2006) Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks. In Consumer electronics, IEEE transactions on, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 742,749, August 2006.

  12. Kumar, A., Namboothiri, P. G., Deshpande, S., Vidhyadharan, S., Sivalingam, K. M., & Murty, S. A. V. S. (2012). Testbed based throughput analysis in a Wireless Sensor Network. In Communications (NCC), pp. 1–5, February 3–5, 2012.

  13. Mraz, L., Cervenka, V., Simek, M., & Komosny, D. (2013) Comprehensive performance analysis of ZigBee technology based on real measurements. Wireless Personal Communication, 2013, Vol. 71/ 4.

  14. IEEE Computer Society, et al. Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), 2nd rev. edition, 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2006. http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.15.4-2006.pdf.

  15. Jennic Ltd. (2006-08-15), Calculating 802.15.4 Data Rates, Application Note JN-AN-1035. http://www.jennic.com/support/application_notes/jn-an-1035_calculating_data_rates_in_an_ieee_802154-based_network. Accessed June 12, 2012.

  16. Hyncica, O., Kucera, P., Honzik, P., & Fiedler, P. (2011) Performance evaluation of symmetric cryptography in embedded systems. In Intelligent data acquisition and advanced computing systems (IDAACS), 2011 IEEE 6th international conference on, Vol. 1, no., pp. 277,282, September 15–17, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by SIX CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0072 and CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0094.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Cervenka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cervenka, V., Mraz, L. & Komosny, D. Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Lightweight Mesh and Its Comparison with ZigBee Pro Technology. Wireless Pers Commun 78, 1527–1538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1832-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1832-x

Keywords

Navigation