Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective Sunflower Based Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Multipath Routing in IoT Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging needs of innovative services in different areas led to the development of advanced intelligent systems using the heterogeneous technologies, devised by Internet of Things (IoT). IoT focuses on integrating the networks to facilitate smooth services to the humans. The interface between mobility patterns and the routing protocols contributes significantly to alter the performance of network. This paper proposes routing protocol based on Sunflower based grey wolf optimization (SFG) algorithm for improving the network lifetime. The first step is the simulation of IoT and then, the multipath routing is initiated in the IoT network. The SFG algorithm selects the best path from the multipath available for routing, based on Context awareness, Network lifetime, Residual Energy, Trust, and Delay. Finally, the multipath routing takes place in the IoT network through optimal routing path selected using the proposed SFG algorithm. The proposed SFG algorithm is designed by integrating sun flower optimization (SFO) and the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) such that the optimal routes are selected. The proposed SFG outperformed other methods with minimal delay of 0.779 s, maximal energy of 0.203 J, maximal network lifetime of 98.039%, and maximal throughput of 47.368%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu, C. H., & Chung, Y. C. (2007). Heterogeneous wireless sensor network deployment and topology control based on irregular sensor model. In C. Cérin & K. C. Li (Eds.), Advances in grid and pervasive computing (pp. 78–88). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Deebak, B. D., & Al-Turjman, F. (2020). A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in IoT-based wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 102022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Quynh, T. N., Le Manh, N., & Nguyen, K. N. (2015, June). Multipath RPL protocols for greenhouse environment monitoring system based on Internet of Things. In 2015 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), pp. 1–6.

  4. Aburumman, A., Seo, W., Esposito, C., Castiglione, A., Islam, R., & Choo, K. R. (2016). A secure and resilient cross-domain SIP solution for MANETs using dynamic clustering and joint spatial and temporal redundancy. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 29, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, B., Bhatnagar, S., & Nath, B. (2003). ReInForM: Reliable information forwarding using multiple paths in sensor networks. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Local Computer Networks, Bonn, Germany, pp. 406–415.

  6. Al-Turjman, F. (2019). Cognitive routing protocol for disaster-inspired internet of things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 1103–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadjidj, A., Bouabdallah, A., & Challal, Y. (2010). HDMRP: An efficient fault tolerant multipath routing protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Heterogeneous Netw. Quality, Rel., Secur. Robust. (QShine), pp. 469–482.

  8. Hasan, M. Z., & Al-Turjman, F. (2017). Optimizing multipath routing with guaranteed fault tolerance in internet of things. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(19), 6463–6473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El Mahdi, F., Habbani, A., Bouamoud, B., & Souidi, M. (2019). Bootstrapping services availability through multipath routing for enhanced security in urban IoT. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications, pp. 1–9.

  10. Xu, W., Yan, P., & Xia, D. (2005). Similar node-disjoint multi-paths routing in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, pp. 731–734.

  11. Jaiswal, K., & Anand, V. (2019). An optimal QoS-aware multipath routing protocol for IoT based wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India.

  12. Venkatasubramanian, S., & Gopalan, N. P. (2009). A QoS-based robust multipath routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of First Asian Himalayas International Conference on Internet, pp. 1–7.

  13. Li, P., Guo, L., & Wang, F. (2019). A multipath routing protocol with load balancing and energy constraining based on AOMDV in Ad Hoc network. Mobile Networks and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01295-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Narra, H., Cheng, Y., Cetinkaya, E. K., Rohrer, J. P., & Sterbenz, J. P. G. (2011). Destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV) routing protocol implementation in ns-3. In Proceedings of the International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, pp. 439–446.

  15. Chakeres, I. D., & Belding-Royer, E. M. (2004). AODV routing protocol implementation design. In Proceedings of International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, pp. 698–703.

  16. Khaleelahmed, S., & Venkateswara Rao, N. (2020). Energy efficient power allocation using Salp Particle Swarm Optimization model in MIMO–NOMA systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 111, 1235–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Santosh Kumar, B. P., & Venkata Ramanaiah, K. (2019). An efficient hybrid optimization algorithm for image compression. Multimedia Research, 2(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vidyadhari, C., Sandhya, N., & Premchand, P. (2019). A semantic word processing using enhanced cat swarm optimization algorithm for automatic text clustering. Multimedia Research, 2(4), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le, Q., Ngo-Quynh, T., & Magedanz, T. (2014). Rpl-based multipath routing protocols for internet of things on wireless sensor networks. In 2014 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2014), pp. 424–429.

  20. Qiu, T., Sun, W., Bai, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2013). An efficient multi-path self-organizing strategy in internet of things. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(4), 1613–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, M., Wang, J., Lin, K., Wu, D., Wan, J., Peng, L., & Youn, C. H. (2016). M-plan: Multipath planning based transmissions for IoT multimedia sensing. In 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), September, pp. 339–344.

  22. Waheb, A. J., Saad, W. K., & Ismail, M. (2018). MEQSA-OLSRv2: A multicriteria-based hybrid multipath protocol for energy-efficient and QoS-aware data routing in MANET-WSN convergence scenarios of IoT. IEEE Access, 6, 76546–76572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Turjman, F. (2017). Energy-aware data delivery framework for safety-oriented mobile IoT. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(1), 470–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhumane, A. V., & Prasad, R. S. (2019). Multi-objective fractional gravitational search algorithm for energy efficient routing in IoT. Wireless Networks, 25(1), 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim, W. H., & Isa, N. A. M. (2014). Particle swarm optimization with adaptive time-varying topology connectivity. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, Z., He, M., Liang, W., & Chen, K. (2015). Trust-aware and low energy consumption security topology protocol of wireless sensor network. Journal of Sensors, 2015, 716468.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Balachandra, M., Prema, K. V., & Makkithaya, K. (2014). Multi constrained and multipath QoS aware routing protocol for MANETs. Wireless Networks, 20(8), 2395–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gomes, G. F., da Cunha, S. S., & Ancelotti, A. C. (2019). A sunflower optimization (SFO) algorithm applied to damage identification on laminated composite plates. Engineering with Computers, 35(2), 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Musolesi, M., & Mascolo, C. (2008). Car: Context-aware adaptive routing for delay-tolerant mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(2), 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, Z., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Bu, F., & Wei, Z. (2012). A context-aware routing protocol on internet of things based on sea computing model. Journal of Computers, 7(1), 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sinhgad College of Science, Ambegaon, Pune, Maharashtra, 411041, India

    Reena P. Pingale

  2. CMCS College, Nashik, Maharashtra, 422013, India

    S. N. Shinde

Authors
  1. Reena P. Pingale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. N. Shinde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reena P. Pingale.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pingale, R.P., Shinde, S.N. Multi-objective Sunflower Based Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Multipath Routing in IoT Network. Wireless Pers Commun 117, 1909–1930 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07951-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07951-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation