Skip to main content
Log in

Microcracking and Fracture Process in Cement Mortar and Concrete: A Comparative Study Using Acoustic Emission Technique

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports the acoustic emission (AE) study of precursory micro-cracking activity and fracture behaviour of quasi-brittle materials such as concrete and cement mortar. In the present study, notched three-point bend specimens (TPB) were tested under crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) control at a rate of 0.0004 mm/sec and the accompanying AE were recorded using a 8 channel AE monitoring system. The various AE statistical parameters including AE event rate \( \left( {\frac{dn }{dt }} \right) \), AE energy release rate \( \left( {\frac{dE }{dt }} \right) \), amplitude distribution for computing the AE based b-value, cumulative energy (ΣE) and ring down count (RDC) were used for the analysis. The results show that the micro-cracks initiated and grew at an early stage in mortar in the pre peak regime. While in the case of concrete, the micro-crack growth occurred during the peak load regime. However, both concrete and mortar showed three distinct stages of micro-cracking activity, namely initiation, stable growth and nucleation prior to the final failure. The AE statistical behavior of each individual stage is dependent on the number and size distribution of micro-cracks. The results obtained in the laboratory are useful to understand the various stages of micro-cracking activity during the fracture process in quasi-brittle materials such as concrete & mortar and extend them for field applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karihaloo BL (1995) Fracture mechanics and structural concrete. Addison, Wesley Longman, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasi-brittle materials. CRC Press, Roca Baton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shah SP, Swartz SE, Ouyang C (1995) Fracture mechanics of concrete: applications of fracture mechanics to concrete, rock and other quasi-brittle materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Mier JGM (1997) Fracture process of concrete: Assessment of material parameters for fracture models. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL

  5. Maji A, Shah SP (1988) Process zone and acoustic-emission measurements in concrete. Exp Mech 28:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah SG, Chadrakishen JM (2011) Fracture properties of concrete-concrete interface using digital image correlation. Exp Mech 51:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farhang AA (2005) The influence of positive temperature gradient on fracture energy of concrete, Proceedings of the workshop on fracture mechanics for concrete pavements: theory to practice, Copper Mountain, Colorado USA, 10-12 Aug 2005, preceding the 8th international conference on concrete pavements

  8. Grosse CU, Ohtsu M (2008) Acoustic emission testing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Vidya Sagar R, Raghu Prasad BK (2012) A review of recent development in parametric based acoustic emission techniques applied to concrete structures. Nondestruct Test Eval 27(1):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohtsu M (1996) The history and development of acoustic emission in concrete engineering. Mag Concr Res 48(147):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Colombo S, Main IG, Forde MC (2003) Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using b-value analysis of acoustic emission signals. ASCE J Mat Civ Eng 5(6):280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao MVMS, Prasanna Lakshmi KJ, Nagaraja Rao GM, Vijayakumar K, Udayakumar S (2011) Precursory microcracking and brittle failure of Latur basalt and migmatite gneiss under compressive loading. Curr Sci 101(8):1053–1059

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scholz CH (1968) The frequency–magnitude relation of microcracking in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:399–415

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lockner D (1993) The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30:883–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Recommendation of RILEM TC 212-ACD: acoustic emission and related NDE techniques for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete. Measurement method for acoustic emission signals in concrete. Mat Str 43:1177–1181

  16. Main IG, Meredith PG, Jones C (1989) A reinterpretation of the precursory seismic b-value anomaly from fracture mechanics. Geophys J 96:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schumacher T, Higgins CC, Lovejoy SC (2011) Estimating operating load conditions on reinforced concrete highway bridges with b-value analysis from acoustic emission monitoring. Struct Health Monit 10(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao MVMS, Prasanna Lakshmi KJ (2005) Analysis of b-value and improved b-value of acoustic emissions accompanying rock fracture. Curr Sci 89:1577–1582

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A (2011) The b-value analysis for the stability investigation of the ancient Athena Temple in Syracuse. Strain 47(Suppl):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G (2003) Damage diagnostic in concrete and masonry structures by acoustic emission technique, Facta universities. Ser Mech Autom Control Robot 3:55–764

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carpinteri A, Xu J, Lacidogna G, Manuello A (2012) Reliable onset time determination and source location of acoustic emissions in concrete structures. Cem Concr Compos 34:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lacidogna G, Carpinteri A, Manuello A, Durin G, Schiavi A, Niccolini G, Agosto A (2011) Acoustic and electromagnetic emissions as precursor phenomena in failure processes. Strain 47(2):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schiavi A, Niccolini G, Tarizzo P, Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A (2011) Acoustic emissions at high and low frequencies during compression tests of brittle materials. Strain 47(2):105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Puzzi S (2008) Prediction of cracking evolution in full scale structures by the b-value analysis and Yule statistics. Phys Mesomech 11(5–6):260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A (2007) Damage mechanisms interpreted by acoustic emission signal analysis. Key Eng Mater 347:577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurz JH, Finck F, Grosse CU, Reinhardt HW (2006) Stress drop and stress redistribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Struct Health Monit 5:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Landis EN, Baillon L (2002) Experiments to relate acoustic emission energy to fracture energy of concrete. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 128:698–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. RILEM draft recommendations (1991) TC-89 FMT fracture mechanics of concrete – test methods. Mater Struct 23:461–465

    Google Scholar 

  29. Physical Acoustic Corporation (PAC) (2005) SAMOS AE system User’s manual Rev. 2 May 2005, NJ USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Vidya Sagar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vidya Sagar, R., Prasad, R.V., Raghu Prasad, B.K. et al. Microcracking and Fracture Process in Cement Mortar and Concrete: A Comparative Study Using Acoustic Emission Technique. Exp Mech 53, 1161–1175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9708-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9708-z

Keywords

Navigation