Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Selectively Laser Melted Parts with Body-Centred-Cubic Lattices of Varying cell size

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant weight savings in parts can be made through the use of additive manufacture (AM), a process which enables the construction of more complex geometries, such as functionally graded lattices, than can be achieved conventionally. The existing framework describing the mechanical properties of lattices places strong emphasis on one property, the relative density of the repeating cells, but there are other properties to consider if lattices are to be used effectively. In this work, we explore the effects of cell size and number of cells, attempting to construct more complete models for the mechanical performance of lattices. This was achieved by examining the modulus and ultimate tensile strength of latticed tensile specimens with a range of unit cell sizes and fixed relative density. Understanding how these mechanical properties depend upon the lattice design variables is crucial for the development of design tools, such as finite element methods, that deliver the best performance from AM latticed parts. We observed significant reductions in modulus and strength with increasing cell size, and these reductions cannot be explained by increasing strut porosity as has previously been suggested. We obtained power law relationships for the mechanical properties of the latticed specimens as a function of cell size, which are similar in form to the existing laws for the relative density dependence. These can be used to predict the properties of latticed column structures comprised of body-centred-cubic (BCC) cells, and may also be adapted for other part geometries. In addition, we propose a novel way to analyse the tensile modulus data, which considers a relative lattice cell size rather than an absolute size. This may lead to more general models for the mechanical properties of lattice structures, applicable to parts of varying size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aremu A, Ashcroft I, Wildman R, Hague R, Tuck C, Brackett D (2013) The effects of bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization parameters on an industrial designed component for additive manufacture. P I Mech Eng B- J Eng 227(6):794–807

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chahine G, Smith P, Kovacevic R (2010) Application of topology optimization in modern additive manufacturing in Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp 606–618

  3. Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing, in Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium:348–362

  4. Gardan N (2014) Knowledge management for topological optimization integration in additive manufacturing. Int J Manuf Eng, vol:2014

  5. Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Wildman R, Hague R (2014) An error diffusion based method to generate functionally graded cellular structures. Comput Struct 138(0):102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P, Raymont D (2014) Advanced lightweight 316l stainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater Des 55:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith M, Guan Z, Cantwell W (2013) Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Int J Mech Sci 67:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ushijima K, Cantrell WJ, Mines RAW, Tsopanos S, Smith M (2011) An investigation into the compressive properties of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. J Sandw Struct Mat 13:303–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleck NA, Deshpande VS, Ashby MF (2010) Micro-architectured materials past, present and future. Proc R Soc A 466:2495–2516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kooistra GW, Deshpande VS, Wadley HN (2004) Compressive behavior of age hardenable tetrahedral lattice truss structures made from aluminium. Acta Mater 52:4229–4237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorny B, Niendorf T, Lackmann J, Thoene M, Troester T, Maier H (2011) In situ characterization of the deformation and failure behavior of non-stochastic porous structures processed by selective laser melting. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 528:7962–7967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brennan-Craddock J, Brackett D, Wildman R, Hague R (2012) The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture,J Phys Conference Series, vol. 382, no. 1,012042

  13. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tool Manu 62:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasan R (2013) Progressive collapse of titanium alloy micro-lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting PhD thesis. University of Liverpool

  15. Tsopanos S, Mines RAW, McKown S, Shen Y, Cantrell WJ, Brooks W, Sutcliffe CJ (2010) The influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of selectively laser melted stainless steel microlattice structures J Manuf Sci Eng (ASME), vol. 132, p. 041011

  16. Shen Y, McKown S, Tsopanos S, Sutcliffe CJ, Mines RAW, Cantwell WJ (2010) The mechanical properties of sandwich structures based on metal lattice architectures. J Sandw Struct Mat 12:159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson L, Ashby M (1997) Cellular Solids: Structure and properties. Cambridge University Press

  18. Ashby M (2006) The properties of foams and lattices. Philos T Roy Soc A 364:15–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elascticity. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roark RJ, Young WC (1976) Formulas for stress and strain. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dillard T (2004) Caractérisation et simulation numérique du comportement Mécanique des mousses de nickel: morphologie tridimensionnelle, réponse élastoplastique et rupture PhD thesis Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris

  22. Queheillalt DT, Katsumura Y, Wadley HN (2004) Synthesis of stochastic open cell ni-based foams. Scripta Mater 50:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Collapse of truss core sandwich beams in 3-point bending. Int J Solids Struct 38:6275–6305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Bubb SL, Young P, Raymont D (2014) Evaluation of light-weight alsi10mg periodic cellular latticestructures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J Mater Process Tech 214:856–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deshpande V, Ashby MF, Fleck NA (2001) Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater 49:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khaderi S, Deshpande V, Fleck N (2014) The stiffness and strength of the gyroid lattice. Int J Solids Struct 51:3866–3877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalidindi S, Abusafieh A, El-Danaf E, Accurate characterization of machine compliance for simple compression testing (1997). Exp Mech 37(2):210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. (2007). In: Boyer R, Welsch G, Collings E (eds) Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. ASM International

  29. In: Donachie M (ed) Titanium A Technical Guide. ASM International, 200

  30. Vrancken B, Thijs L, Kruth J-P, Humbeeck JV (2012) Heat treatment of ti6al4v produced by selective laser melting: Microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloy Compd 541:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Facchini L, Magalini E, Robotti P, Molinari A, Höges S, Wissenbach K (2010) Ductility of a ti-6al-4v alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyping J 16:450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McKown S, Shen Y, Brookes W, Sutcliffe C, Cantwell W, Langdon G, Nurick G, Theobald M (2008) The quasi-static and blast loading response of lattice structures. Int J Impact Eng 35:795–810. Twenty-fifth Anniversary Celebratory Issue Honouring Professor Norman Jones on his 70th Birthday.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simonelli M (2014) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V PhD thesis. Loughborough University

  34. Blazy J-S, Marie-Louise A, Forest S, Chastel Y, Pineau A, Awade A, Grolleron C, Moussy F (2004) Deformation and fracture of aluminium foams under proportional and non proportional multi-axial loading: statistical analysis and size effect. Int J Mech Sci 46:217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramamurty U, Paul A (2004) Variability in mechanical properties of a metal foam. Acta Mater 52:869–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sean Smith, Ravi Aswathanarayanaswamy, Hossein Sheykh-Poor and various teams at Renishaw Plc. for the provision of the test specimens and continued support in our collaborative projects. Thanks also to Mark East, Mark Hardy and Joe White, technicians of the Additive Manufacture and 3D Printing Research Group at Nottingham. Funding was provided by Innovate UK, formerly the UK Technology Strategy Board (TSB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Maskery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maskery, I., Aremu, A., Simonelli, M. et al. Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Selectively Laser Melted Parts with Body-Centred-Cubic Lattices of Varying cell size. Exp Mech 55, 1261–1272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0021-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0021-5

Keywords

Navigation