Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Characterization of SLM and EBM Cubic Lattice Structures for Lightweight Applications

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study carries out an experimental characterization of lattice structures that are based on cubic cells fabricated through selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM). The lattice failure under compressive load is studied as a function of the process typology, material properties, and dimensional parameters of the unit cell. The bulk material is first characterized to evaluate the process stability. Three main failure modes of the lattice are identified, depending on the response of ductile/brittle material and the direction of crack propagation. The relationship between lattice geometrical parameters and mechanical strength is observed. The results of the modeling and experiments are suitable to validate the design of lightweight components built with AM processes. The structural performances related to geometrical features, material properties and technological constraints are well explained for further applications in structural design. The equivalent Young’s module of lattice samples with different cell size has been measured and compared with numerical simulations based on the homogenization method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennan-Craddock J, Brackett D, Wildman R, Hague R (2012) The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture. J Phys Conf Ser 382:012042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eshraghi S, Das S (2012) Micromechanical finite-element modeling and experimental characterization of the compressive mechanical properties of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold prepared by selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8:3138–3143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prager W (1974) Introduction to structural optimization. Springer Verlag, Vienna

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozvany GI (1997). Aims, scope, basic concept and methods of topology optimization, in: Topology optimization in structural mechanics, Springer

  5. Bakhvalov N, Panasenko G (1989) Homogenization: averaging process in periodic media. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Noor AK (1994) Recent advances and applications of reduction methods. Appl Mech Rev 47:125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirsch U (1993) Structural optimizations, fundamentals and applications. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs MB (1980) Linearized homogeneous constraints in structural design. Int J Mech Sci 22:333–400

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmit LA, Farshi B (1974) Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis. AIAA J 11:489–494

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirsch U (1991) Reduced based approximations of structural displacements for optimal design. AIAA J 29:1751–1758

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirsch U, Toledano G (1983) Approximate reanalysis for modifications of structural geometry. Comput Struct 16:269–279

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi W, Kim J, Park G (2016) Comparison study of some commercial structural optimization software systems. Struct Multidisc Optim 54:685–699

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Booth W, Alperovich J, Chawls P, Ma J, Reid TN, Ramani K (2017) The design for additive manufacturing worksheet. J Mech Des 139:100904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fraizer WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015). Additive manufacturing technologies, second edition, Springer

  17. Chu J, Engelbrecht S, Graf G, Rosen DW (2010) A comparison of synthesis methods for cellular structures with application to additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J 16:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmadi SM, Yavari SA, Wauthle R, Pouran B, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2015) Additively manufactured open-cell porous biomaterials made from six different space-filling unit cells: the mechanical and morphological properties. Materials 8:1871–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scipioni Bertoli U, Wolfer AJ, Matthews MJ, Delplanque JP, Schoenung JM (2017) On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des 113:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rashed MG, Ashraf M, Mines RA, Hazell PJ (2016) Metallic microlattice materials: a current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Mater Design 95:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quadbeck P, Kummel K, Hauser R, Standke G, Adler J, Stephani G (2010). Open cell metal foams - application-oriented structure and material selection. Proc. Of CellMat 2010, Dresden, Germany, 279–288

  22. Bourell DL, Leu MC, Rosen DW (2009). Roadmap for additive manufacturing: identifying the future of freeform processing, Univ of Texas

  23. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1981). The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials, Royal Society publishing

  24. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999). Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press

  25. Ashby MF, Medalist RM (1983) The mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall Trans A 14:1755–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ju J, Summers JD (2011) Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain. Mater Design 32:512–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coulais C (2016) Periodic cellular materials with nonlinear elastic homogenized stress-strain response at small strains. Int J Solids Struct 97-98:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1747–1769

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ushijima K, Cantwell WJ, Chen DH (2013) Prediction of the mechanical properties of micro-lattice structures subjected to multi-axial loading. Int J Mech Sci 68:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith M, Guan Z, Cantwell WJ (2013) Finite element modeling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Int J Mech Sci 67:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dong G, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2017) A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 139:100906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wallach JC, Gibson LJ (2001) Mechanical behavior of a three-dimensional truss material. Int J Solids Struct 38:7181–7196

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Hao L, Raymont D, Yan C, Hussein A, Philippe Y (2011). Design and additive manufacturing of cellular lattice structures. Proc. VRAP 2011, Leiria, Portugal. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11341-40

  34. Park SI, Rosen DW, Choi SK, Duty CE (2014) Effective mechanical properties of lattice material fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing 1-4:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Niu J, Choo HL, Sun W, Mok SH (2017). Numerical study on load-bearing capabilities of beam-like lattice structures with three different unit cells. Int J Mater Des

  36. Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malek S, Gibson L (2015) Effective elastic properties of periodic hexagonal honeycombs. Mech Mater 91:226–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Blazy JS, Marie-Louise A, Forest S, Chastel Y, Pineau A, Awade A, Grolleron C, Moussy F (2004) Deformation and fracture of aluminium foams under proportional and non proportional multi-axial loading: statistical analysis and size effect. Int J Mech Sci 46:217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahshid R, Hansen HN, Højbjerre KL (2016) Strength analysis and modeling of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting for tooling applications. Mater Design 104:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brandl E, Heckenberger U, Holzing V, Buchbinder D (2012) Additive manufactured AlSi10Mg samples using selective laser melting (SLM): microstructure, high cycle fatigue, and fracture behavior. Mater Design 34:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niu J, Choo HL, Sun W (2016) Finite element analysis and experimental study of plastic lattice structures manufactured by selective laser sintering. Proc IMechE Part L 231:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jin T, Zhou Z, Wang Z, Wu G, Shu X (2015) Experimental study on the effects of specimen in-plane size on the mechanical behavior of aluminum hexagonal honeycombs. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 635:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Qiu C, Yue S, Adkins NJ, Ward M, Hassanin H, Lee PD, Withers PJ, Attallah MM (2015) Influence of processing conditions on strut structure and compressive properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 628:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sing SL, Wiria FE, Yeong WY (2018) Selective laser melting of lattice structures: a statistical approach to manufacturability and mechanical behavior. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 49:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Das S (2003) Physical aspects of process control in selective laser sintering of metals. Adv Eng Mater 5:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. P.A. Kobryn, S.L. Semiatin (2001). Mechanical properties of laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V, in: solid freeform fabrication symposium proceedings, Austin, USA

  47. K. Kempen, L. Thijs, E. Yasa, M. Badrossamay, W. Verheecke, J.-P. Kruth (2011). Process optimization and microstructural analysis for selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg, in: proc annual Int solid freeform fabrication Symp, the University of Texas at Austin, USA

  48. Vilaro T, Colin C, Bartout JD (2011) As-fabricated and heat-treated microstructures of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans-A 42:3190–3199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Qiu C, Adkins NJ, Attalah MM (2013) Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 578:230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Guessasma S, Zhang W, Zhu J, Belhabib S, Nouri H (2015) Challenges of additive manufacturing technologies from an optimisation perspective. Int J Simul Multisci Des Optim 6:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tool Manu 62:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gümrük R, Mines RA (2013) Compressive behaviour of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci 68:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Huissein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R, Young P (2013) Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Tech 213:1019–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ahmadi SM, Campoli G, Amin Yavari S, Sajadi B, Wauthle R, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2014) Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J Mech Behav Biomed 34:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Maskery I, Aremu AO, Simonelli M, Tuck C, Wildman RD, Ashcroft IA, Hague RJ (2015) Mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V selectively laser melted parts with body-centered-cubic lattices of varying cell size. Exp Mech 55:1261–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Maskery I, Aboulkhair NT, Aremu AO, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA (2017) Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices. Additive Manufacturing 16:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Leary M, Mazur M, Elambasseril J, McMillan M, Chirent T, Sun Y, Qian M, Easton M, Brandt M (2016) Selective laser melting (SLM) of AlSi12Mg lattice structures. Mater Design 98:344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. De Pasquale G, Montemurro M, Catapano A, Bertolino G, Revelli L (2018) Cellular structures from additive processes: design, homogenization and experimental validation. Structural Integrity Procedia 8:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. De Pasquale G, Bertolino G, Luceri F (2017). Design methods for AM lightweight structures: analytic modeling and validation. Proc. AIV, Firenze, Italy

  60. Mohammad A, Alahmari AM, Mohammed MK, Renganayagalu RK, Moiduddin K (2017) Effect of energy input on microstructure and mechanical properties of titanium aluminide alloy fabricated by the additive manufacturing process of electron beam melting. Materials 10:211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Leuders S, Thöne M, Riemer A, Niendorf T, Tröster T, Richard HA, Maier HJ (2013) On the mechanical behavior of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: fatigue resistance and crack growth performance. Int J Fatigue 48:300–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dong L, Deshpande V, Wadley H (2015) Mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V octet-truss lattice structures. Int J Solids Struct 60-61:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Catapano A, Montemurro M (2014) A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part I: homogenisation of core properties. Compos Struct 118:664–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Catapano A, Montemurro M (2014) A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part II: the optimization strategy. Compos Struct 118:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Torino, Italy

    G. De Pasquale & F. Luceri

  2. BeamIt S.p.A, Strada Prinzera 17, 43045, Fornovo di Taro, Italy

    M. Riccio

Authors
  1. G. De Pasquale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Luceri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Riccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. De Pasquale.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Pasquale, G., Luceri, F. & Riccio, M. Experimental Characterization of SLM and EBM Cubic Lattice Structures for Lightweight Applications. Exp Mech 59, 469–482 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00481-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00481-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation