Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Food crop accumulation and bioavailability assessment for antimony (Sb) compared with arsenic (As) in contaminated soils

  • 14th EuCheMS International Conference on Chemistry and the Environment (ICCE 2013, Barcelona, June 25 - 28, 2013)
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field samples and a 9-week glasshouse growth trial were used to investigate the accumulation of mining derived arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) in vegetable crops growing on the Macleay River Floodplain in Northern New South Wales, Australia. The soils were also extracted using EDTA to assess the potential for this extractant to be used as a predictor of As and Sb uptake in vegetables, and a simplified bioaccessibility extraction test (SBET) to understand potential for uptake in the human gut with soil ingestion. Metalloids were not detected in any field vegetables sampled. Antimony was not detected in the growth trial vegetable crops over the 9-week greenhouse trial. Arsenic accumulation in edible vegetable parts was <10 % total soil-borne As with concentrations less than the current Australian maximum residue concentration for cereals. The results indicate that risk of exposure through short-term vegetable crops is low. The data also demonstrate that uptake pathways for Sb and As in the vegetables were different with uptake strongly impacted by soil properties. A fraction of soil-borne metalloid was soluble in the different soils resulting in Sb soil solution concentration (10.75 ± 0.52 μg L–1) that could present concern for contamination of water resources. EDTA proved a poor predictor of As and Sb phytoavailability. Oral bioaccessibility, as measured by SBET, was <7 % for total As and <3 % total Sb which is important to consider when estimating the real risk from soil borne As and Sb in the floodplain environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez-Ayuso E, Otones V, Murciego A, Garcia-Sanchez A, Santa-Regina I (2013) Mobility and phytoavailability of antimony in an area impacted by a former stibnite mine exploitation. Sci Tot Environ 449:260–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anawar H, Freitas MC, Canha N, Santa Regina I (2011) Arsenic, antimony and other trace element contamination in a mine tailings affected area and uptake by tolerant plant species. Environ Geochem Health 33:353–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand

  • Asher CJ, Reay PF (1979) Arsenic uptake by barley seedlings. Aust J Plant Physiol 6:459–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley PM, Graham B, Tighe M, Wolfenden BJ (2007) Antimony and arsenic dispersion in the Macleay River catchment, New South Wales, Australia: a study of the environmental geochemical consequences. Aust J Earth Sci 54:83–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azcue JM, Nriagu JO (1994) Arsenic: Historical perspectives. In: Nriagu JO (ed) Arsenic in the environment Part 1: cycling and characterisation. Wiley, Toronto, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta NT, Rodriguez RR, Casteel SW (2001) Bioavailability and risk of arsenic exposure by the soil ingestion pathway. In: Frankenberger WT Jr (ed) Environmental chemistry of arsenic. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya P, Samal AC, Majumdar J, Santra SC (2010) Arsenic contamination in rice, wheat, pulses, and vegetables: A study in an arsenic affected area of West Bengal, India. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:3–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HJM (1979) Environmental geochemistry of the elements. Academic, New York, p 333

    Google Scholar 

  • Canecka L, Bujdos M, Matus P, Hagarova I (2011) Kinetic sorption study of arsenic, antimony and phosphorus onto synthetic iron oxides. Fresen Environ Bull 20(12A):3401–3404

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craw D, Rufaut C, Haffert L, Paterson L (2007) Plant colonization and uptake on high arsenic mine wastes, New Zealand. Water Air Soil Pollut 179:351–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceriotti G, Amarasiriwardena D (2009) A study of antimony complexed to soil-derived humic acids and inorganic antimony species along a Massachusetts highway. Microchem J 91:58–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Conesa HM, Wieser M, Gasser M, Hockmann K, Evangelou MWH, Studer B, Schulin R (2010) Effects of three amendments on extractability and fractionation of Pb, Cu, Ni and Sb in two shooting range soils. J Hazard Mater 181:845–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conesa HM, Wieser M, Studer B, Schulin R (2011) Effects of vegetation and fertilizer on metal and Sb plant uptake in a calcareous shooting range soil. Ecol Eng 37:654–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 545–567

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gregori I, Fuentes E, Olivares D, Pinochet H (2004) Extractable copper, arsenic and antimony by EDTA solution from agricultural Chilean soils and its transfer to alfalfa plants (Medicago sativa L.). J Environ Monit 6:38–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denys S, Tack K, Caboche J, Delalain P (2008) Bioaccessibility, solid phase distribution, and speciation of Sb in soils and in digestive fluids. Chemosphere 74:711–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denys S, Caboche J, Tack K, Rychen G, Wragg J, Cave M, Jondreville C, Feidt C (2012) In vivo validation of the unified BARGE method to assess the bioaccessibility of arsenic, antimony, cadmium, and lead in soils. Environ Sci Technol 46:6252–6260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou MWH, Hockmann K, Pokharel R, Jakob A, Schulin R (2012) Accumulation of Sb, Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd by various plant species on two different relocated shooting range soils. J Environ Manag 108:102–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth R, Sridokchan W, Goessler W (2002) Arsenic species in an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pityrogramma calomelanos: a potential phytoremediator of arsenic-contaminated soil. Sci Tot Environ 284:27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y (2002) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters I. Occurrence. Earth-Sci Rev 57:125–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Williams PA, Belzile N (2009) Antimony in the environment: knowns and unknowns. Environ Chem 6:95–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn HC, Meharg AA, Bowyer PK, Paton GI (2003) Antimony bioavailability in mine soils. Environ Pollut 124:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FSANZ (2011) Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code. Standard 1.4.1 Contaminants and Natural Toxicants. ComLawID F2011COO542 (11 July 2011), Food Standards Australia and New Zealand

  • Griggs CS, Martin WA, Larson SL, O′Connor G, Fabian G, Zynda G, Mackie D (2011) The effect of phosphate application on the mobility of antimony in firing range soils. Sci Tot Environ 409:2397–2403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Sinha S (2007) Assessment of single extraction methods for the prediction of bioavailability of metals to Brassica juncea L. Czern. (var. Vaibhav) grown on tannery waste contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 149:144–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammel W, Debus R, Steubing L (2000) Mobility of antimony in soil and its availability to plants. Chemosphere 41:1791–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helsesen H, Larsen EH (1998) Bioavailability and speciation of arsenic in carrots grown in contaminated soil. Analyst 123:791–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang C, Jaillard B (2003) Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248:43–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Chen Z, Liu W (2012) Influence of iron plaque and cultivars on antimony uptake by translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings exposed to Sb (III) or Sb(V). Plant Soil 352:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He M (2007) Duistribution and phytoavailability of antimony at an antimony mining and smelting area, Huan, China. Environ. Geochem Health 29:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husaini SN, Zaidi JH, Matiullah AM (2011a) Appraisal of venemous metals in selected crops and vegetables from industrial areas of the Punjab Province. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 290:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husaini SN, Zaidi JH, Matiullah, Naeem K, Akram M (2011b) Metal poisoning and human health hazards due to contaminated salad vegetables. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 287:543–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CA, Inskeep WP, Neuman DR (1997) Arsenic transport in contaminated mine tailings following liming. J Environ Qual 26:433–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Rofe A, Kutchel T, Sansom L, Naidu R (2007a) In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils. Chemosphere 69:69–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Rofe A, Kutchel T, Sansom L, Naidu R (2007b) Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailaibility in contaminated soils. Chemosphere 69:961–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz AL, Weber J, Smith E, Naidu R, Rees M, Rofe A, Kutchel T, Sansom L (2009) Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 43:9487–9494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung MC, Thornton I, Chon H-T (2002) Arsenic, Sb and Bi contamination of soils, plants, waters and sediments in the vicinity of the Dalsung Cu-W mine in Korea. Sci Tot Environ 295:81–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A (2000) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly ME, Brauning SE, Schoof RA, Ruby MV (2002) Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil. Battelle, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempsey Shire Council (2013) Kempsey Shire Council Webpage. Accessed 14/9/2013. http://www.kempsey.nsw.gov.au/environment/floodplain/acidsulphatesoil.html

  • Kloke A, Sauerbeck DR, Vetter H (1984) The contamination of plants and soils with heavy metals and the transport of metals in terrestrial food chains. In: Nriagu J (ed) Changing metal cycles and human health. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe F, Weiss H, Morgenstern P, Wennrich R, Lorenz W, Schurk K, Stanjek H, Daus B (2011) Sorption of aqueous antimony and arsenic species to akaganeite. J Colloid Interf Sci 357:460–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath SP, Zhao F-J (2003) Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Curr Opin Biotech 14:277–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies N, Guppy C (2000) In-situ soil solution extraction with polyacrylonitril hollow-fibres. Commun Soil Sci Plan 31:1875–1886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies NW, Donn MJ, Kopittle PM (2007) Evaluation for extractants for estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environ Pollut 145:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller K, Daus B, Mattusch J, Vetterlein D, Merbach I, Wennrich R (2013) Impact of arsenic on uptake and bioaccumulation of antimony by arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Environ Pollut 174:128–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu R (2006) Managing arsenic in the environment: from soil to human health. CSIRO, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail P, McCaffrey C, Ogden R, Foster N, Gillett A, Hayes D (2004) Uptake of arsenic by vegetables for human consumption: a study of Welligborough allotment plots. Land Contam Reclam 12:219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC & NRMMC (2011) Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 2011. National Water Quality Management Strategy. National Health and Medical Research Council and the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Australia

  • Okkenhaug G, Zhu Y-G, He J, Li X, Luo L, Mulder J (2012) Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in Sb mining impacted paddy soil from Xikuangshan, China: Differences in mechanisms controlling soil sequestration and uptake in rice. Environ Sci Technol 46:3155–3162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porquet A, Filella M (2007) Structural evidence of the similarity of Sb(OH)3 and As(OH)3 with glycerol: implications for their uptake. Chem Res Toxicol 20:1269–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi C, Wu F, Deng Q, Liu G, Mo C, Liu C, Zhu J (2011) Distribution and accumulation of antimony in plants in the super-large Sb deposit areas, China. Microchem J 97:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quevauviller P, Rauet R, Rubio R, Lopez-Sanchez J-F, Ure A, Bacon J, Muntau H (1997) Certified reference materials for the quality control of EDTA and acetic acid-extractable contents of trace elements in seawge sludge amended soils (CRMs 483 and 484). Fresnius J Anal Chem 357:611–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BH, Bischofberger S, Stoll A, Schroer D, Furrer G, Roulier S, Gruenwald A, Attinger W, Schulin R (2008) Plant uptake of trace elements on a Swiss military shooting range: uptake pathways and land management implications. Environ Pollut 153:668–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RR, Basta NT, Casteel SW, Pace LW (1999) An in-vitro gastro-intestinal method to assess bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media. Environ Sci Technol 33:642–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby MV, Davis A, Schoof R, Eberle S, Sellstone CM (1996) Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ Sci Technol 30:422–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W, Goldade M, Post G, Harnois M, Mosby DE, Casteel SW, Berti W, Carpenter M, Edwards D, Cragin D, Chappell W (1999) Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol 33:3697–3705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N, Bowman M, Mclure S (2012) Effect of soil type on distribution and bioaccessibility of metal contaminants in shooting range soils. Sci Tot Environ 438:452–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steely S, Amarasiriwardena D, Xing B (2007) An investigation of inorganic antimony species and antimony associated with humic acid molar mass fractions in contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 148:590–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thanabalasingam P, Pickering WF (1986) Arsenic sorption by humic acids. Environ Pollut 12:233–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telford K, Maher W, Krikowa F, Foster S, Ellwood MJ, Ashley PM, Lockwood PV, Wilson SC (2009) Bioaccumulation of antimony and arsenic in a highly contaminated stream adjacent to the Hillgrove Mine, NSW, Australia. Environ Chem 6:133–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe M, Lockwood P, Wilson S, Lisle L (2004) Comparison of digestion methods for ICPOES analysis of a wide range of analytes in heavy metal contaminated soil samples with specific reference to arsenic and antimony. Commun Soil Sci Plan 35:369–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe M, Ashley P, Lockwood P, Wilson S (2005a) Soil, water and pasture enrichment of antimony and arsenic within a coastal floodplain system. Sci Tot Environ 347:175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe M, Lockwood P, Wilson S (2005b) Adsorption of antimony(V) by floodplain soils, amorphous iron(III)hydroxide and humic acid. J Environ Monit 7:1177–1185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe M, Lockwood PV, Ashley PM, Murison RD, Wilson SC (2013a) The availability and mobility of As and Sb in an acid sulfate soil pasture system. Sci Tot Environ 463–464:151–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe M, Pollino CA, Wilson SC (2013b) Bayesian networks as a screening tool for exposure assessment. J Environ Man 123:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschan M, Robinson B, Schulin R (2008) Antimony uptake by Zea mays (L.) and Helianthus annus (L.) from nutrient solution. Environ Geochem Hlth 30:187–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschan M, Robinson BH, Schulin R (2009) Antimony in the soil-plant system—a review. Environ Chem 6:106–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschan M, Robinson B, Johnson CA, Burgi A, Schulin R (2010) Antimony uptake and toxicity in sunflower and maize growing in SbIII and SbV contaminated soil. Plant Soil 334:235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vacilik M, Jurkovic L, Matejkovic P, Molnarova M, Lux A (2013) Potential risk of arsenic and antimony accumulation by medicinal plants naturally growing on old mining sites. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1546–1562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan X-M, Tandy S, Hockmann K, Schulin S (2013a) Changes in Sb speciation with waterlogging of shooting range soils and impacts on plant uptake. Environ Pollut 172:53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan X-M, Tandy S, Hockmann K, Schulin S (2013b) Effects of waterlogging on the solubility abd redox state of Sb in a shooting range soil and its uptake by grasses: a tank experiment. Plant Soil DOI. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1684-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren GP, Alloway BJ, Lepp NW, Singh B, Bochereau FJM, Penny C (2003) Field trials to assess the uptake of aresnic by vegetables from contaminated soils and soil remediation with iron oxides. Sci Tot Environ 311:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC, Lockwood PV, Ashley PM, Tighe M (2010) The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environ Pollut 158:1169–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC, Leech CD, Butler L, Lisle L, Ashley PM, Lockwood PV (2013) Effects of mine site rehabilitation strategies on antimony and arsenic plant availability. J Hazard Mater 261:801–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Thornton I (1985) Arsenic in garden soils and vegetable crops in Cornwall, England: implications for human health. Environ Geochem Hlth 7:131–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSW EPA and Kempsey Shire Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

    Susan C. Wilson, Matthew Tighe, Ewan Paterson & Paul M. Ashley

Authors
  1. Susan C. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Tighe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ewan Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul M. Ashley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan C. Wilson.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, S.C., Tighe, M., Paterson, E. et al. Food crop accumulation and bioavailability assessment for antimony (Sb) compared with arsenic (As) in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 11671–11681 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2577-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2577-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation