Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What contributes to the regional inequality of haze pollution in China? Evidence from quantile regression and Shapley value decomposition

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Against the increasingly serious haze pollution in China, this paper is to compare the impacts of different factors on haze pollution in different regions, and understand the causes of regional inequality of haze pollution. In doing so, quantile regression and regression-based Shapley value decomposition are employed in this paper. The main results are as follows. (1) Population density and industrialization level have positive impacts on haze pollution, while economic development negatively influences haze pollution, however, the impact of environmental regulation on haze pollution is ineffective. (2) With quantile increasing, the effect of foreign direct investment on haze pollution changes from positive to negative, and the influence of energy intensity on haze pollution changes from negative to positive. (3) The decomposition results specify that the regional inequality in population density is the main cause of the regional disparities of haze pollution. The inequalities in industrialization level and regional factors are also important reasons, and the contribution of energy intensity cannot be ignored either. The regional gap of economic development is conducive to reducing the regional disparities of haze pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borozan D (2019) Unveiling the heterogeneous effect of energy taxes and income on residential energy consumption. Energy Policy 129:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett JW, Madariaga J (2016) The convergence of U.S. state-level energy intensity. Energy Econ 62:357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenery H, Robinson S, Syrquin M (1986) Industrialization and growth: a comparative study. Oxford University Press

  • Chowdhury S, Dey S, Guttikunda S, Pillarisetti A, Smith KR, Di Girolamo L (2019) Indian annual ambient air quality standard is achievable by completely mitigating emissions from household sources. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(22):10711–10716

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1(2):277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Bian Z, Yu B, Wang Y, Zhang S, Li J, Su B, Long R (2018a) Can land urbanization help to achieve CO2 intensity reduction target or hinder it? Evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 134:206–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Dai Y, Zhang S, Zhang X, Long R (2019a) Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China. Sci Total Environ 653:565–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Li J, Li K, Sun Z, Yu B, Wang Y, Zhang S (2019b) Causal chain of haze decoupling efforts and its action mechanism: evidence from 30 provinces in China. J Clean Prod 118889

  • Dong F, Wang Y, Zheng L, Li J, Xie S (2019c) Can industrial agglomeration promote pollution agglomeration? Evidence from China J Clean Prod 118960

  • Dong F, Yu B, Pan Y (2019d) Examining the synergistic effect of CO2 emissions on PM2.5 emissions reduction: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 223:759–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Yu B, Zhang J (2018b) What contributes to regional disparities of energy consumption in China? Evidence from quantile regression-Shapley decomposition approach. Sustainability 10(6)

  • Dong F, Zhang S, Long R, Zhang X, Sun Z (2019e) Determinants of haze pollution: an analysis from the perspective of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. J Clean Prod 222:768–783

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua Y, Zhang Y (2019f) The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: a perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Du G, Liu S, Lei N, Huang Y (2018) A test of environmental Kuznets curve for haze pollution in China: evidence from the penal data of 27 capital cities. J Clean Prod 205:821–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA, Alcántara V, Padilla E (2010) International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: an analysis of OECD countries. Ecol Econ 69:2468–2474

    Google Scholar 

  • Duro JA, Padilla E (2006) International inequalities in per capita CO2 emissions: a decomposition methodology by Kaya factors. Energy Econ 28:170–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeftens M, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Bellander T, Cesaroni G, Cirach M, Declercq C, Dėdelė A, Dons E, de Nazelle A, Dimakopoulou K, Eriksen K, Falq G, Fischer P, Galassi C, Gražulevičienė R, Heinrich J, Hoffmann B, Jerrett M, Keidel D, Korek M, Lanki T, Lindley S, Madsen C, Mölter A, Nádor G, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Nonnemacher M, Pedeli X, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Patelarou E, Quass U, Ranzi A, Schindler C, Stempfelet M, Stephanou E, Sugiri D, Tsai MY, Yli-Tuomi T, Varró MJ, Vienneau D, Klot Sv, Wolf K, Brunekreef B, Hoek G (2012) Development of land use regression models for PM2.5, PM2.5 absorbance, PM10 and PMcoarse in 20 European study areas; results of the ESCAPE project. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):11195–11205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Li S, Fan C, Bai Z, Yang K (2016) The impact of PM2.5 on asthma emergency department visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(1):843–850

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Tian H, Cheng K, Lu L, Zheng M, Wang S, Hao J, Wang K, Hua S, Zhu C, Wang Y (2015) The variation of chemical characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 and formation causes during two haze pollution events in urban Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 107:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Tian Y, Zhang C, Shi G, Hao H, Zeng F, Shi C, Zhang M, Feng Y, Li X (2014) Local and long-range transport influences on PM2.5 at a cities-cluster in northern China, during summer 2008. Particuology 13:66–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan D, Su X, Zhang Q, Peters G, Liu Z, Lei Y, He K (2014) The socioeconomic drivers of China’s primary PM2.5 emissions. Environ Res Lett 9(2):024010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Liu YM (2016) The influential factors of urban PM2.5 concentrations in China: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 112:1443–1453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Yang F, Ma Y et al (2001) The characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 35:4959–4970

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Chen CH, Li L, Cheng Z, Wang HL, Huang HY, Streets DG, Wang YJ, Zhang GF, Chen YR (2011) Emission inventory of anthropogenic air pollutants and VOC species in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmos Chem Phys 11:4105–4120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang K, Zhuang G, Wang Q, Fu JS, Lin Y, Liu T, Han L, Deng C (2014) Extreme haze pollution in Beijing during January 2013: chemical characteristics, formation mechanism and role of fog processing. Atmos Chem Phys 14:7517–7556

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueglin C, Gehrig R, Baltensperger U, Gysel M, Monn C, Vonmont H (2005) Chemical characterisation of PM2.5, PM10 and coarse particles at urban, near-city and rural sites in Switzerland. Atmos Environ 39(4):637–651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karimu A, Brännlund R, Lundgren T, Söderholm P (2017) Energy intensity and convergence in Swedish industry: a combined econometric and decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 62:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression Quantile. Econometrica 46(1):33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo YM, Wang SW, Jang CS, Yeh N, Yu HL (2011) Identifying the factors influencing PM2.5 in southern Taiwan using dynamic factor analysis. Atmos Environ 45(39):7276–7285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Lin B (2015) Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: does the level of development matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1107–1122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (2015) Threshold effects of foreign direct investment on China’s carbon emissions. Resour Sci 37:163–174 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2010) Revisiting world energy intensity convergence for regional differences. Appl Energy 87:3218–3225

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Du P, Samat A, Xia J, Che M, Xue Z (2017) Spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in mainland China and analysis of its influencing factors using geographically weighted regression. Sci Rep 7:40607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao L (2017) Examining the impact factors of urban residential energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China – evidence from city-level data. Ecol Indic 73:29–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mielnik O, Goldemberg J (2000) Converging to a common pattern of energy use in developing and industrialized countries. Energy Policy 28:503–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell D (2016a) Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Quantile Treatment Effects

  • Powell D (2016b) Quantile treatment effects in the presence of covariates. RAND Labor and Population Working Paper

  • Querol X, Alastuey A, Ruiz CR, Artiñano B, Hansson HC et al (2004) Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in selected European cities. Atmos Environ 38(38):6547–6555

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Li X, Cao J, Yang L (2016) China's economic policy choices for governing smog pollution based on spatial spillover effects. Econ Res J 9:73–88 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks AF (1982) Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica 50(1):193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks AF (1999) Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. J Econ Inequal 11(1):99–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai A, Mickley LJ, Jacob DJ (2010) Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos Environ 44(32):3976–3984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, et al. (2018) Global Annual PM2.5 Grids from MODIS, MISR and SeaWiFS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) with GWR, 1998-2016. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) https://doi.org/10.7927/H4ZK5DQS

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Hsu NC, Kahn RA, Levy RC, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Winker DM (2016) Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ Sci Technol 50(7):3762–3772

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan G (2002) Regression-based inequality decomposition: pitfalls and a solution procedure, WIDER Discussion Papers//World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER)

  • Wan G (2004) Accounting for income inequality in rural China: a regression-based approach. J Comp Econ 32(2):348–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan G, Lu M, Chen Z (2005) Globalization and regional inequality: Chinese evidence. Soc Sci China 3:17–26 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan G, Zhou Z (2005) Income inequality in rural China_ regression-based decomposition using household data. Rev Dev Econ 9(1):107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HJ, Chen HP (2016) Understanding the recent trend of haze pollution in eastern China: roles of climate change. Atmos Chem Phys 16:4205–4211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HJ, Chen HP, Liu JP (2015) Arctic sea ice decline intensified haze pollution in eastern China. Atmos. Ocean Sci Lett 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Xu J, Yang J, Zhao X, Wei W, Cheng D, Pan X, Su J (2012) Understanding haze pollution over the southern Hebei area of China using the CMAQ model. Atmos Environ 56:69–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhou C, Wang Z, Feng K, Hubacek K (2017) The characteristics and drivers of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) distribution in China. J Clean Prod 142:1800–1809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T (2018) Impacts of urbanization-related factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from China's three regions with varied urbanization levels. Atmospheric Pollution Res 9(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ (2007) Sharing resources: the global distribution of the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 64(2):402–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AM, Phaneuf DJ, Barrett MA, Su JG (2019) Short-term impact of PM2.5 on contemporaneous asthma medication use: behavior and the value of pollution reductions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(12):5246–5253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhang P, Yi H, Qin Z (2016) What causes haze pollution? An empirical study of PM2.5 concentrations in Chinese cities. Sustainability 8(2):132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Li L, Du L, Ma D (2015) Study on the meteorological factors and atmospheric circulation of the typical haze processes over Hubei province. Resource Environ Yangtze Basin 24:191–196 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Zhai Q, Wang W, Yu J, Lu F, Chen Q (2018) Does intensive land use promote a reduction in carbon emissions? Evidence from the Chinese industrial sector. Resour Conserv Recycl 137:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lin B (2016) Regional differences of pollution emissions in China: contributing factors and mitigation strategies. J Clean Prod 112:1454–1463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lin B (2018) What cause large regional differences in PM2.5 pollutions in China? Evidence from quantile regression model. J Clean Prod 174:447–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HY, Lahr ML (2014) China's energy consumption change from 1987 to 2007: a multi-regional structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 67:682–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Li M (2017) Study on the regional difference in the relationship among haze pollution, economic growth and environmental regulation from the perspective of spatial gravitational effect. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 27:23–34 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Liang W, Zhang Y, Han Y (2019a) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation and haze pollution—theoretical analysis and experience from China. J Beijing Inst Technol (Soc Sci Ed) 21:37–49 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Wang C, Fang S (2019b) Application of geographically weighted regression (GWR) in the analysis of the cause of haze pollution in China. Atmospheric Pollution Res 10(3):835–846

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71974188 and 71573254), Humanities and Social Sciences Special Research Fund of Ministry of Education in China (Research on Talents Training for Engineering Science and Technology, Grant No. 19JDGC011), Jiangsu Funds for Social Science (Grant No. 17JDB004), and Jiangsu Education Science Project (Grant No. B-b/2015/01/027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Dong or Bolin Yu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, F., Yu, B., Pan, Y. et al. What contributes to the regional inequality of haze pollution in China? Evidence from quantile regression and Shapley value decomposition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 17093–17108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07929-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07929-8

Keywords

Navigation