Abstract
Foreign direct investment (FDI) and the consumption of non-renewable energy have been on the increase in the coastal Mediterranean countries (CMCs) over the last few decades. Both trigger growth, but the environmental impact could be far-reaching as environmental distortions are mainly human-induced. This study examines the environmental issues facing CMCs. Specifically, we investigate whether the pollution haven hypothesis holds for CMCs. We employ a quantile panel data analysis for CMCs to account for heterogeneity and distributional effects of socioeconomic factors. The result reveals that the influence of FDI on environmental degradation is a function of the indicators utilized and also depends on the initial levels of environmental degradation. The results suggest that the pollution haven hypothesis does not hold for CMCs. However, we also find that energy consumption significantly increases environmental degradation for all indicators and across the observed quantiles. The effects of economic growth and urbanization on the environment were mixed for the different indicators and across quantiles. We recommend that it is pertinent for CMCs to limit their “dirty” energy sources and substitute them with renewables to promote environmental sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdouli M, Hammami S (2018) The dynamic links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment, and economic growth in the Middle Eastern and North African countries (MENA Region). J Knowl Econ 9(3):833–853
Abrevaya J (2001) Nonparametric Econometrics. Econ J 111(472)471–471
Ahmed Z, Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(26):26782–26796
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–18
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709
Anser MK (2019) Impact of energy consumption and human activities on carbon emissions in Pakistan: application of STIRPAT model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(13):13453–13463
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208
Belaid F, Zrelli MH (2019) Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, environmental degradation and economic development: evidence from Mediterranean countries. Energy Policy 133:110929
Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2018) The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manag 219:218–230
Bera AK, Galvao AF, Montes-Rojas GV, Park SY (2016) Asymmetric laplace regression: maximum likelihood, maximum entropy and quantile regression. Journal of Econometric Methods 5(1):79–101
Buckely PJ, Casson M (1976) The future of multinational experience. Homes and Meier Publishers, New York
Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, Yu L (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ 123:73–85
Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel Data. Handbook of Economics, 2; 1274 – 1318. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Chang SC, Li M-H (2019) Impacts of foreign direct investment and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions across different population regimes. Environ Resour Econ 72(2):583–607
Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Dev Econ 9(4):530–548
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787
Cramer JC (1998) Population growth and air quality in California. Demography 35(1)45–56
Danish Ulucak R, Khan SU (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 101996
Danish, & Wang, Z. (2019) Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: what we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustain Cities Soc 49
De Silva PNK, Simons SJR, Stevens P (2016) Economic impact analysis of natural gas development and the policy implications. Energy Policy 88:639–651
DeHart JL, Soule PT (2000) Does I=PAT work in local place? Prof Geogr 52(91):1–10
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 94:–175, 179
Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO 2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10846–10854
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213
Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2019). Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment, 0958305X19834279.
Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO 2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 94:419–429
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560
Fakher HA (2019) Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(10):10276–10291
Global Footprint Network (2019). Global Footprint Network. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/(2019), Accessed 1st May 2019.
Gorus MS, Aslan M (2019) Impacts of economic indicators on environmental degradation: evidence from MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 103:259–268
Gorus MS, Aydin M (2019) The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: Causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy 168:815–822
Graham, B.S., J. Hahn, A. Poirier & J.L. Powell (2015). Quantile regression with panel data. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. 21034, Cambridge: Massachusetts.
Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991). Environmental impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 3914, Cambridge: Massachusetts.
Hammoudeh S, Nguyen DK, Sousa RM (2014) Energy prices and CO2 emission allowance prices: a quantile regression approach. Energy Policy 70:201–206
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938
He FS, Gan GGG, Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA (2019) The influences of economic indicators on environmental pollution in Malaysia. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(2):123–131
Hubacek K, Guan D, Barrett J, Wiedmann T (2009) Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. J Clean Prod 17(14):1241–1248
Hübler M (2017) The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: a quantile regression approach. Ecol Econ 134:174–185
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74
Khan Y, Bin Q (2019) The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions and trade on belt and road initiative countries: A spatial panel data approach. The Singapore Economic Review 1–28
Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(1):790–804
Liu H, Kim H (2018) Ecological footprint, foreign direct investment, and gross domestic production: evidence of Belt & Road Initiative countries. Sustainability 10(10):1–28
Mikayilov JI, Mukhtarov S, Mammadov J, Azizov M (2019) Re-evaluating the environmental impacts of tourism: does EKC exist? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14
Nathaniel SP (2019) Modelling urbanization, trade flow, economic growth and energy consumption with regards to the environment in Nigeria. GeoJournal:1–15
Nathaniel SP (2020) Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal:1–14
Nathaniel, S. P., & Bekun, F. V. (2019). Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: the Nigerian experience. Journal of Public Affairs, e2037.
Nathaniel SP, Iheonu CO (2019) Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci Total Environ 679:337–345
Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, Sharma G, Shah M, Adeleye N (2019) Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12
Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020a) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13
Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Sharma G, Shah M (2020b) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14
Nathaniel, S., Barua, S., Hussain, H., & Adeleye, N. (2020c). The determinants and interrelationship of carbon emissions and economic growth in African economies: fresh insights from static and dynamic models. Journal of Public Affairs, e2141.
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398
Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Muhammad S (2019) Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Sci Total Environ 686:1019–1029
Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(22):21993–22022
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871
Shao Q, Wang X, Zhou Q, Balogh L (2019) Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: a comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach. J Clean Prod 227:724–738
Shen J, Wei YD, Yang Z (2017) The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. J Clean Prod 148:785–794
Sherwood B, Wang L (2016) Partially linear additive quantile regression in ultra-high dimension. Ann Stat 44(1):288–317
Shi A (2003) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975/1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44(1):24–42
Sinha A, Gupta M, Shahbaz M, Sengupta T (2019) Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. J Clean Prod
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(25):24845–24859
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719
Soulé PT, DeHart JL (1998) Assessing IPAT using production- and consumption-based measures of I. Soc Sci Q 79(4):754–765 JSTOR
Ssali MW, Du J, Mensah IA, Hongo DO (2019) Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11245–11260
Sun C, Zhang F, Xu M (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. J Clean Prod 161:153–164
UNCTAD (2019). Foreign direct investment: inward and outward flows and stock, annual, United Nations conference on trade and development, Available online: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740.
Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80(20):18
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748
World Bank (1993) Foreign direct investments - benefits beyond insurance. Development Brief Number 14
World Development Indicator (WDI) (2019). World Bank Development Indicators database (online) available at https://data.worldbank.org/ Accessed date 24.10.2019.
Xie R, Yuan Y, Huang J (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112
Xu B, Lin B (2018) Investigating the differences in CO2 emissions in the transport sector across Chinese provinces: evidence from a quantile regression model. J Clean Prod 175:109–122
York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 68(2):279–300
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428
Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951
Zhang Z, Xi L, Bin S, Yuhuan Z, Song W, Ya L et al (2019) Energy, CO2 emissions, and value added flows embodied in the international trade of the BRICS group: a comprehensive assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 116:109432
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016a) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248
Zhu H, Guo Y, You W, Xu Y (2016b) The heterogeneity dependence between crude oil price changes and industry stock market returns in China: evidence from a quantile regression approach. Energy Econ 55:30–41
Zrelli MH (2017) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in selected Mediterranean countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 19(4):691–709
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nathaniel, S., Aguegboh, E., Iheonu, C. et al. Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35474–35487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6
Keywords
- FDI
- Carbon emissions
- Carbon footprint
- Ecological footprint
- Energy consumption
- Urbanization
- Quantile regression method