Skip to main content
Log in

The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing interest among researchers in analyzing the ecological footprint of any country, this study focuses on new dimensions to analyze the long-run and short-run asymmetric impact of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey by using Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lag model for the period from 1986 to 2018. Further, the EKC hypothesis was also tested. The results show that tourism, globalization, and financial development are positively and significantly associated with the EFP. This means that the increase in these variables will further increase the ecological footprint in Turkey. The U-shaped EKC curve was found to be valid in Turkey. The results also depict nonlinear and asymmetric association among most of the variables. Hence, based on the results, further research directions and practical implications can be suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Eluwole KK, Alola UV, Lasisi TT, Avci T (2019) Environmental quality and energy import dynamics: the tourism perspective of the coastline mediterranean countries (CMCs) 34

  • Akadiri SS, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2019) Examining the impact of globalization in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the case of tourist destination states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(12):12605–12615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04722-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akadiri SS, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2020) Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globalization, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis. Curr Issue Tour 23(4):470–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1539067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anatasia V (2015) The causal relationship between GDP, exports, energy consumption, and CO2 in Thailand and Malaysia. Int J Econ Perspect 9:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2402–2408

    Google Scholar 

  • Arain H, Han L, Sharif A, Meo MS (2020) Investigating the effect of inbound tourism on FDI: the importance of quantile estimations. Tour Econ 26(4):682–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhat M, Rosselló J (2011) Estimation of tourism-induced electricity consumption: the case study of Balearics Islands, Spain. Energy Econ 33(3):437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batool R, Sharif A, Islam T, Zaman K, Shoukry AM, Sharkawy MA, Gani S, Aamir A, Hishan SS (2019) Green is clean: the role of ICT in resource management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(24):25341–25358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becken S (2002) Analysing international tourist flows to estimate energy use associated with air travel. J Sustain Tour 10(2):114–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Borhan HB, Ahmed EM (2012) Simultaneous model of pollution and income in Malaysia. Int J Econ Perspect 6(1):50–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozkurt C, Akan Y, Okumus I (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. In: BRICTS: the role of tourism. Economic and Social Development, Book of Proceedings, pp 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt JS, Buckley RC (2018) A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 32:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Khediri KB (2016) Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: cointegration with structural breaks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:1322–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho JS, Kim T, Shin Y (2015) Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework. J Econ 188(1):281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2000) The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ, 5

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F, Bulbul S (2017) Investigating the impacts of energy consumption, real GDP, tourism and trade on CO2 emissions by accounting for cross-sectional dependence: a panel study of OECD countries. Curr Issue Tour 20(16):1701–1719

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ, 0958305X19834279

  • Doytch N, Uctum M (2016) Globalization and the environmental impact of sectoral FDI. Econ Syst 40(4):582–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gaston N (2008) Has globalization increased inequality? Rev Int Econ 16(3):516–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Eluwole KK, Akadiri SS, Alola AA, Etokakpan MU (2020) Does the interaction between growth determinants a drive for global environmental sustainability? Evidence from world top 10 pollutant emissions countries. Sci Total Environ 705:135972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogdu E (2010) Turkish support to Kyoto protocol: a reality or just an illusion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(3):1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing BR, Hawkins TR, Wiedmann TO, Galli A, Ercin AE, Weinzettel J, Steen-Olsen K (2012) Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecol Indic 23:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA (2003) The environment and globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Glaesser D, Kester J, Paulose H, Alizadeh A, Valentin B (2017) Global travel patterns: an overview. J Travel Med, 24(4)

  • Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24190–24200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gössling S, Peeters P, Hall CM, Ceron J-P, Dubois G, Scott D (2012) Tourism and water use: supply, demand, and security. An international review. Tour Manag 33(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur Econ Rev 35(2–3):517–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991a) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991b) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (no. w3914). Natl bur econ res, NBER working paper no. 3914. National Bureau of economic research, Cambridge

  • Habibullah MS, Din BH, Chong CW, Radam A (2016) Tourism and biodiversity loss: implications for business sustainability. Proc Econ Finance 35:166–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez et al. (2018) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia | SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9

  • Hall CM, Gössling S (2013) Sustainable culinary systems: local foods, innovation, and tourism & hospitality. Routledge

  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H (2008) Globalization, inequality, and local-level dynamics: Indonesia and the Philippines. Asian Econ Policy Rev 3(1):42–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Istaiteyeh RMS (2016) Causality analysis between electricity consumption and real GDP: evidence from Jordan. Int J Econ Perspect 10(4):526–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones A (2010) Globalization: Key thinkers (Vol. 1). Polity

  • Jovicic DZ (2019) From the traditional understanding of tourism destination to the smart tourism destination. Curr Issue Tour 22(3):276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan Z (2011) R&D for environmental innovation and supportive policy: the implications for new energy automobile industry in China. Energy Procedia 5:1003–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumadilova S (2012) The role of oil and gas sector for the economy of Kazakhstan. Int J Econ Perspect 6:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahia M, Kadria M, Aissa MSB, Lanouar C (2017) Modelling the treatment effect of renewable energy policies on economic growth: evaluation from MENA countries. J Clean Prod 149:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalayci S, Koksal C (2015) The relationship between China’s airway freight in terms of carbon-dioxide emission and export volume. Int J Econ Perspect 9(4):60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapusuzoglu A (2014) Causality relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: results from a multi-country study. Int J Econ Perspect 8(2):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasoy A (2019) Drivers of carbon emissions in Turkey: considering asymmetric impacts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):9219–9231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04354-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu ST (2014) International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36:180–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu S (2017) Investigating the role of oil prices in the conventional EKCmodel: evidence from Turkey. Asian Econ Fin Rev 7(5):498–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu S, Gokmenoglu KK, Eren BM (2018) Testing the role of tourism development in ecological footprint quality: evidence from top 10 tourist destinations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(33):33611–33619

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioğlu S, Katircioğlu S (2018) Testing the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Appl Econ Lett 25(11):741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1361004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katircioğlu ST (2014) Testing the tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Singapore. Econ Model 41:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim TH, White H (2003) Estimation, inference, and specification testing for possibly misspecified quantile regression. Adv Econ 17:107–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiráľová (2019) Sustainable tourism marketing strategy: competitive advantage of destination. In: Information Resources Management Association (USA) Sustainable tourism: breakthroughs in research and practice. IGI Global, pp 183–206

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2013) Investigating the influence of tourism on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from panel analysis of the European Union. Tour Manag 38:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Li Y, Li X, Xu D (2018) The dynamic analysis and evaluation on tourist ecological footprint of city: take Shanghai as an instance. Sustain Cities Soc 37:541–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann G, Dredge D (2012) Tourism in Brazil: environment, management and segments. Routledge

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:340–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 13(2):487–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Managi S, Jena PR (2008) Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecol Econ 65(2):432–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens P, Raza M (2010) Is globalisation sustainable? Sustainability 2(1):280–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Sinha A, Sharif A, Suki NM (2019) Dynamic linkages between tourism, transportation, growth and carbon emission in the USA: evidence from partial and multiple wavelet coherence. Curr Issue Tour:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1667965

  • Naradda Gamage SK, Hewa Kuruppuge R, Haq IU (2017) Energy consumption, tourism development, and environmental degradation in Sri Lanka. Energ Source Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12(10):910–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM (2010) A Bayesian approach to analyzing the ecological footprint of 140 nations. Ecol Indic 10(4):808–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrabet Z, Alsamara M (2017) Testing the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Qatar: a comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1366–1375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova M, Jebril L (2019) The need to evaluate ecosystem benefits retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332190261_THE_NEED_TO_EVALUATE_ECOSYSTEM_BENEFITS

  • Ozatac N, Gokmenoglu K, Taspinar N (2017) Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(20):16690–16701

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan B, Ari A (2017) Nuclear energy-economic growth nexus in OECD countries: a panel data analysis. Int J Econ Perspect 11(1):138–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1916–1928

    Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(30):30708–30719

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Pırnar I, Günlü E (2012) Destination management and quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 529–545). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2288-0_31

  • Qureshi MI, Elashkar EE, Shoukry AM, Aamir A, Mahmood NHN, Rasli AM, Zaman K (2019) Measuring the ecological footprint of inbound and outbound tourists: evidence from a panel of 35 countries. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21(10):1949–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01720-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38(5):2528–2535

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz-de-Miera O, Rossello J (2014) Modeling tourism impacts on air pollution: the case study of PM10 in Mallorca. Tour Manag 40:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2699–2709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M (2013) Does financial instability increase environmental degradation? Fresh evidence from Pakistan. Econ Model 33:537–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Lahiani A, Abosedra S, Hammoudeh S (2018a) The role of globalization in energy consumption: a quantile cointegrating regression approach. Energy Econ 71:161–170

  • Shahbaz M, Zakaria M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK (2018b) The energy consumption and economic growth nexus in top ten energy consuming countries: fresh evidence from using the quantile-on-quantile approach. Energy Econ 71:282–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev 62(04):929–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Ahmad N, Alam S (2016) Financial development and environmental quality: the way forward. Energy Policy 98:353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Saha S, Loganathan N (2017) Does tourism sustain economic growth? Wavelet-based evidence from the United States. Tour Anal 22(4):467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Afshan S, Khan BS (2018) Does democracy embolden economic growth in Pakistan? Evidence from ARDL bound testing and rolling window analysis. Int J Econ Bus Res 15(2):180–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi MA (2019) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11191–11211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2011) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, p 281–314

  • Solarin SA (2014) Tourist arrivals and macroeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Anatolia 25(2):228–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(25):24845–24859

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatchnaia-Tamirisa N, Loke MK, Leung P, Tucker KA (1997) Energy and tourism in Hawaii. Ann Tour Res 24(2):390–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixidó-Figueras J, Duro JA (2015) The building blocks of international ecological footprint inequality: a regression-based decomposition. Ecol Econ 118:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovar C, Lockwood M (2008) Social impacts of tourism: an Australian regional case study. Int J Tour Res 10(4):365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2018) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Statistics, 2016. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do;jsessionid=6h2ybpyZZPplp0972xtTsZXg9 GBntVP2lSF3zKWTZ8T16hTlDJL1!1771578339?id=27675

  • Tutulmaz O (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve time series application for Turkey: why controversial results exist for similar models? Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:73–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic 77:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators. Retrieved January 17, 2020, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG

  • Xiao Z (2009) Quantile cointegrating regression. J Econ 150:248–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuchao W, Priyadarsini R, Eang LS (2010) Benchmarking energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Singapore’s hotel industry. Energy Policy 38(8):4520–4527

    Google Scholar 

  • Zee SML, Burford RL (2008) Explorations in estimation methodologies for a simplified model of residential demand for electricity with systematically varying coefficients. Int J Econ Perspect 2(2):94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Gao J (2016) Exploring the effects of international tourism on China's economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution: evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:225–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kittisak Jermsittiparsert.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Godil, D.I., Sharif, A., Rafique, S. et al. The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 40109–40120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09937-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09937-0

Keywords

Navigation