Abstract
The economic complexity index, which indicates the level of knowledge and skills needed in the production of the exported goods, is a measure of economic development. Some researchers have investigated the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by considering the effect of economic complexity on environmental pollution. This study, for the first time, examines the impact of economic complexity, globalization, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on both CO2 emissions and ecological footprint within the framework of the EKC hypothesis in the USA. To this end, the combined cointegration test and three different estimators are utilized for the period from 1980 to 2016. The main finding of the study indicates that the inverted U-shaped EKC relationship between economic complexity and environmental pollution holds for the USA. In addition to this finding, globalization and renewable energy consumption play a dominant role in reducing environmental pollution, while non-renewable energy consumption contributing factor to environmental pressure. Overall, the outcomes indicate that increasing economic complexity helps to minimize environmental degradation after a threshold, and the US government can provide a better environment by using renewable energy sources and globalization.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
Apergis N, Christou C, Gupta R (2017) Are there environmental Kuznets curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.219
Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2402–2408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0548-3
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00091
Bayer C, Hanck C (2013) Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal 34(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00814.x
Ben Jebli M, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031
Bilgili F, Kocak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E, İlkay SÇ (2020) Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(1):1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06996-w
Boluk G, Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy 74:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.008
Boswijk HP (1994) Testing for an unstable root in conditional and structural error correction models. J Econ 63(1):37–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)01560-9
BP (2019) British Petroleum statistical review of world energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/xlsx/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-all-data.xlsx
Bulut U (2019) Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14562–14569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6
Can M, Gozgor G (2017) The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16364–16370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7
Chu LK (2020) Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity. Appl Econ Lett:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280
CIA Factbook (2020) CIA world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/239rank.html
Danish ZB, Wang B, Wang Z (2017) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Destek MA (2019) Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:33601–33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10846–10854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y
Dogan E, Seker F (2016a) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
Dogan E, Seker F (2016b) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Dogan B, Saboori B, Can M (2019) Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):31900–31912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
EIA (2020) Renewable energy production and consumption by source https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/?tbl=T10.01#/?f=A&start=1949&end=2018&charted=6-7-8-9-14
Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: J Econometr Soc 55(2):251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19(3):863–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8
Global Footprint Network (2019) National footprint accounts. http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?cn=351&type=BCpc,EFCpc
Gormus S, Aydin M (2020) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:27904–27913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research
Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF globalisation index–revisited. Rev Int Organ 14(3):543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09357-x
Haseeb A, Xia E, Baloch MA, Abbas K (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(31):31283–31296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7
Hausmann R, Hidalgo CA, Bustos S, Coscia M, Simoes A, Yildirim MA (2014) The atlas of economic complexity: mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press
Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R (2009) The building blocks of economic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(26):10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
IRENA (2015) Renewable energy prospects: United States of America, REmap 2030 analysis. IRENA, Abu Dhabi www.irena.org/remap
Isık C, Ongan S, Ozdemir D (2019) Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: an application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):10846–10853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04514-6
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2):231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
Khan D, Ullah A (2019) Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15194–15208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04913-9
Lapatinas A, Garas A, Boleti E, Kyriakou A (2019) Economic complexity and environmental performance: evidence from a world sample. MPRA Paper No. 92833.
Lean HH, Smyth R (2013) Are fluctuations in US production of renewable energy permanent or transitory? Appl Energy 101:483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.022
Lee KH, Min B (2014) Globalization and carbon constrained global economy: a fad or a trend? J Asia Pac Bus 15(2):105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2014.904181
Lee J, Strazicich M (2013) Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Econ Bull 34(3):2483–2492
Liu M, Ren X, Cheng C, Wang Z (2020) The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Sci Total Environ 718:137379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379
Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:340–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004
Neagu O (2019) The link between economic complexity and carbon emissions in the European Union countries: a model based on the environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach. Sustainability 11(17):4753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174753
Neagu O, Teodoru MC (2019) The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas emission: heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability 11(2):497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020497
Nikolova M (2015) The need to evaluate ecosystem benefits. Bus Manag 25(2):61–88
OEC (2020) Economic complexity rankings. https://oec.world/en/rankings/country/neci/
Olivier JG, Schure KM, Peters JAHW (2017) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions. The Hauge PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2017-trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissons-2017-report_2674.pdf
Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng 3(1):1167990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990
Pata UK (2018a) The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure Environ. Sci Pollut Res 25(8):7740–7747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6
Pata UK (2018b) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
Pata UK (2018c) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095
Pata UK (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve and trade openness in Turkey: bootstrap ARDL approach with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(20):20264–20276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05266-z
Pham NM, Huynh TLD, Nasir MA (2020) Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: a Malthusian view. J Environ Manag 260:110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
Rafindadi AA, Usman O (2019) Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test. J Environ Manag 244:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.048
Rahman S, Chen S, Saud S, Bano S, Haseeb A (2019) The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(24):24733–24747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05714-w
Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.021
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Hammoudeh S, Shahzad SJH (2017a) Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural beaks: the role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Econ 68:548–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.004
Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017b) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singapore Econ Rev 62(04):929–957. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817400331
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018a) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020
Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky, P (2018b) How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis. Appl Econ 50(13):1479–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366640
Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052
Swart J, Brinkmann L (2020) Economic complexity and the environment: Evidence from Brazil. In: Universities and Sustainable Communities: meeting the goals of the agenda 2030. Springer, Cham, pp 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_1
Tzeremes P (2018) Time-varying causality between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: evidence from US states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):6044–6060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0979-x
Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, The New Catalyst Bioregional Series
Wang Z, Rasool Y, Asghar MM, Wang B (2019) Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36248–36263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04876-x
World Bank (2020) World development indicators online database. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Yilanci V, Pata UK (2020) Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: the role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32683–32694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4
You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016
Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the Editor of the journal, Eyup Dogan, and four anonymous reviewers for their useful and constructive comments. All remaining errors and shortcomings are entirely mine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pata, U.K. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 846–861 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3