Abstract
Impervious surface is mainly defined as any surface which water cannot infiltrate the soil. Due to the impact of urban impervious surfaces (UIS) on environmental issues, the amount of impervious surfaces has been recognized as the most significant index of environmental quality. Detection and analysis of impervious surfaces within a watershed is one of the developing areas of scientific interest. This study evaluates and compares the accuracy and performance of five classification algorithms—supervised object-based nearest neighbour (NN) classifier, supervised pixel-based maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), supervised pixel-based spectral angle mapper (SAM), band ratioing normalized difference built-up index (NDBI), and normalized difference impervious index (NDII)—in extracting urban impervious surfaces. Our first aim was to identify the most effective method for mapping UIS using Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 satellite data. The second aim was to compare and reveal the efficiency of the spatial and spectral resolution of Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 data in extracting UIS. The results revealed that the supervised object-based NN approach using the visible and near-infrared bands of both satellite imagery produced the most homogenous and accurate map among the other methods. The object-based NN algorithm achieved an overall classification accuracy of 90.91% and 88.64%, and Kappa coefficient of 0.82 and 0.77 for Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 images, respectively. The study also showed that the Sentinel-2 image yielded better results than the Landsat-8 pan-sharpened image in extracting detail and classification accuracy. Comparing these methods in the selected challenging study area can provide insight into the selection of the classification method for rapid and reliable extraction of UIS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu) and the US Geological Survey (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov). The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Arnold CL Jr, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62:243–258
Bauer M, Loeffelholz B, Wilson B (2005) Estimation, mapping and change analysis of impervious surface area by Landsat remote sensing. In: Proceedings, Pecora 16 Conference. pp 23–27
Belgiu M, Drǎguţ L (2014) Comparing supervised and unsupervised multiresolution segmentation approaches for extracting buildings from very high resolution imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 96:67–75
Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65:2–16
Blaschke T, Lang S, Lorup E et al (2000) Object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications. Environ Inf Plan Polit Public 2:555–570
Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46
Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46
Dhivya B, Niranjan SS, Sarup J, Dharavath K (2015) Mapping of impervious surface using spectral angle mapper (SAM) and NDVI techniques, case study: Bhopal city. Indian J Sci Technol 8
ESA Sentinel-2 operations. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Operations/Sentinel-2_operations. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Fisher P (1997) The pixel: a snare and a delusion. Int J Remote Sens 18:679–685
Fröhlich B, Bach E, Walde I et al (2013) Land cover classification of satellite images using contextual information. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 3:W1
Gangkofner UG, Pradhan PS, Holcomb DW (2007) Optimizing the high-pass filter addition technique for image fusion. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73:1107–1118
Garg A, Pal D, Singh H, Pandey DC (2016) A comparative study of NDBI, NDISI and NDII for extraction of urban impervious surface of Dehradun [Uttarakhand, India] using Landsat 8 imagery. In: Emerging Trends in Communication Technologies (ETCT), International Conference on. IEEE, pp 1–5
Guan H, Li J, Chapman M, Deng F, Ji Z, Yang X (2013) Integration of orthoimagery and lidar data for object-based urban thematic mapping using random forests. Int J Remote Sens 34:5166–5186
Howard L (1818) The Climate of London: deduced from meteorological observations, made at different places in the neighbourhood of the metropolis. W. Phillips, sold also by J. and A. Arch
Ji M, Jensen JR (1999) Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Geocarto Int 14:33–41
Kettig RL, Landgrebe DA (1976) Classification of multispectral image data by extraction and classification of homogeneous objects. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron 14:19–26
Kruse FA, Lefkoff AB, Boardman JW, Heidebrecht KB, Shapiro AT, Barloon PJ, Goetz AFH (1993) The spectral image processing system (SIPS)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens Environ 44:145–163
Landgrebe DA (2005) Signal theory methods in multispectral remote sensing. John Wiley & Sons
Li M, Zang S, Zhang B, Li S, Wu C (2014) A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. Eur J Remote Sens 47:389–411
Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2014) Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons
Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28:823–870
Luo Y, Zhao Y, Yang K, Chen K, Pan M, Zhou X (2018) Dianchi lake watershed impervious surface area dynamics and their impact on lake water quality from 1988 to 2017. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29643–29653
Ma L, Fu T, Blaschke T, Li M, Tiede D, Zhou Z, Ma X, Chen D (2017a) Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6:51
Ma L, Li M, Ma X, Cheng L, du P, Liu Y (2017b) A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 130:277–293
Mendiratta P, Gedam S (2018) Assessment of urban growth dynamics in Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India using object-based image analysis for medium-resolution data. Appl Geogr 98:110–120
Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA (2014) Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens Environ 148:42–57
Phiri D, Morgenroth J (2017) Developments in Landsat land cover classification methods: a review. Remote Sens 9:967
Qian Y, Zhou W, Yan J et al (2015) Comparing machine learning classifiers for object-based land cover classification using very high resolution imagery. Remote Sens 7:153–168
Richards JA (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction, 5th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
Roberts DA, Gardner M, Church R, Ustin S, Scheer G, Green RO (1998) Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains using multiple endmember spectral mixture models. Remote Sens Environ 65:267–279
Samal DR, Gedam SS (2015) Monitoring land use changes associated with urbanization: an object based image analysis approach. Eur J Remote Sens 48:85–99
Slonecker ET, Jennings DB, Garofalo D (2001) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces: a review. Remote Sens Rev 20:227–255
Sun Z, Wang C, Guo H, Shang R (2017) A modified normalized difference impervious surface index (MNDISI) for automatic urban mapping from Landsat imagery. Remote Sens 9:942
Sun Z, Zhao X, Wu M, Wang C (2018) Extracting urban impervious surface from WorldView-2 and airborne LiDAR data using 3D convolutional neural networks. J Indian Soc Remote Sens:1–12
Thenkabail PS (2015) Remotely sensed data characterization, classification, and accuracies, 1st edn. CRC Press
Titiz K (2017) Eskisehir Sanayi Odasi. In: Eskisehir Sanayi Odasi. http://www.eso.org.tr/en/index.php?page=arsiv/index&id=1. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
Trimble (2014) eCognition Developer 9.0–Reference Book
TUIK (2018) http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed 18 Dec 2018
USGS (2018) Landsat imagery: a unique resource. https://www.fort.usgs.gov/sites/landsat-imagery-unique-resource/landsat-imagery-unique-resource. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Verbeeck K, Hermy M, Van Orshoven J (2012) External geo-information in the segmentation of VHR imagery improves the detection of imperviousness in urban neighborhoods. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18:428–435
Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sens Environ 86:370–384
Wang Y, Ji W, Yu X, Xu X, Jiang D, Wang Z, Zhuang D (2014) The impact of urbanization on the annual average temperature of the past 60 years in Beijing. Adv Meteorol 2014:1–9
Wang Z, Gang C, Li X, Chen Y, Li J (2015) Application of a normalized difference impervious index (NDII) to extract urban impervious surface features based on Landsat TM images. Int J Remote Sens 36:1055–1069
Wei C, Blaschke T (2018) Pixel-wise vs. object-based impervious surface analysis from remote sensing: correlations with land surface temperature and population density. Urban Sci 2:2
Weih RC, Riggan ND (2010) Object-based classification vs. pixel-based classification: comparative importance of multi-resolution imagery. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 38:C7
Weng Q (2012) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sens Environ 117:34–49
Wu C, Murray AT (2003) Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ 84:493–505
Xu J, Zhao Y, Zhong K, Ruan H, Liu X (2016) Coupling modified linear spectral mixture analysis and soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) models to simulate surface runoff: application to the main urban area of Guangzhou, China. Water 8:550
Xu R, Liu J, Xu J (2018) Extraction of high-precision urban impervious surfaces from sentinel-2 multispectral imagery via modified linear spectral mixture analysis. Sensors 18:2873
Yuan F, Bauer ME (2007) Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 106:375–386
Zanter K (2018) Landsat 8 data users handbook | Landsat missions. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-8-data-users-handbook. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24:583–594
Zhang H, Weng Q, Lin H, Zhang Y (2015a) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in tropical and subtropical areas. CRC Press
Zhang Y, Ren J, Jiang J (2015b) Combining MLC and SVM classifiers for learning based decision making: analysis and evaluations. Comput Intell Neurosci 2015:44
Zhang H, Lin H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Fang C (2016) Mapping urban impervious surface with dual-polarimetric SAR data: An improved method. Landsc Urban Plan 151:55–63
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing satellite data. We express our sincere thanks to Dr. Kaan Kalkan for his useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SID conceptualized, collected the data, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. ZYA and UA participated in the analysis and interpretation of data. SID, ZYA, and UA reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Ethical approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent to publish
Not applicable
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deliry, S.I., Avdan, Z.Y. & Avdan, U. Extracting urban impervious surfaces from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data for urban planning and environmental management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 6572–6586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4