Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extracting urban impervious surfaces from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data for urban planning and environmental management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impervious surface is mainly defined as any surface which water cannot infiltrate the soil. Due to the impact of urban impervious surfaces (UIS) on environmental issues, the amount of impervious surfaces has been recognized as the most significant index of environmental quality. Detection and analysis of impervious surfaces within a watershed is one of the developing areas of scientific interest. This study evaluates and compares the accuracy and performance of five classification algorithms—supervised object-based nearest neighbour (NN) classifier, supervised pixel-based maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), supervised pixel-based spectral angle mapper (SAM), band ratioing normalized difference built-up index (NDBI), and normalized difference impervious index (NDII)—in extracting urban impervious surfaces. Our first aim was to identify the most effective method for mapping UIS using Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 satellite data. The second aim was to compare and reveal the efficiency of the spatial and spectral resolution of Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 data in extracting UIS. The results revealed that the supervised object-based NN approach using the visible and near-infrared bands of both satellite imagery produced the most homogenous and accurate map among the other methods. The object-based NN algorithm achieved an overall classification accuracy of 90.91% and 88.64%, and Kappa coefficient of 0.82 and 0.77 for Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 images, respectively. The study also showed that the Sentinel-2 image yielded better results than the Landsat-8 pan-sharpened image in extracting detail and classification accuracy. Comparing these methods in the selected challenging study area can provide insight into the selection of the classification method for rapid and reliable extraction of UIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu) and the US Geological Survey (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov). The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Arnold CL Jr, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer M, Loeffelholz B, Wilson B (2005) Estimation, mapping and change analysis of impervious surface area by Landsat remote sensing. In: Proceedings, Pecora 16 Conference. pp 23–27

  • Belgiu M, Drǎguţ L (2014) Comparing supervised and unsupervised multiresolution segmentation approaches for extracting buildings from very high resolution imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 96:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65:2–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T, Lang S, Lorup E et al (2000) Object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications. Environ Inf Plan Polit Public 2:555–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhivya B, Niranjan SS, Sarup J, Dharavath K (2015) Mapping of impervious surface using spectral angle mapper (SAM) and NDVI techniques, case study: Bhopal city. Indian J Sci Technol 8

  • ESA Sentinel-2 operations. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Operations/Sentinel-2_operations. Accessed 12 Nov 2018

  • Fisher P (1997) The pixel: a snare and a delusion. Int J Remote Sens 18:679–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich B, Bach E, Walde I et al (2013) Land cover classification of satellite images using contextual information. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 3:W1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangkofner UG, Pradhan PS, Holcomb DW (2007) Optimizing the high-pass filter addition technique for image fusion. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73:1107–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Pal D, Singh H, Pandey DC (2016) A comparative study of NDBI, NDISI and NDII for extraction of urban impervious surface of Dehradun [Uttarakhand, India] using Landsat 8 imagery. In: Emerging Trends in Communication Technologies (ETCT), International Conference on. IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Guan H, Li J, Chapman M, Deng F, Ji Z, Yang X (2013) Integration of orthoimagery and lidar data for object-based urban thematic mapping using random forests. Int J Remote Sens 34:5166–5186

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard L (1818) The Climate of London: deduced from meteorological observations, made at different places in the neighbourhood of the metropolis. W. Phillips, sold also by J. and A. Arch

  • Ji M, Jensen JR (1999) Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Geocarto Int 14:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettig RL, Landgrebe DA (1976) Classification of multispectral image data by extraction and classification of homogeneous objects. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron 14:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse FA, Lefkoff AB, Boardman JW, Heidebrecht KB, Shapiro AT, Barloon PJ, Goetz AFH (1993) The spectral image processing system (SIPS)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens Environ 44:145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Landgrebe DA (2005) Signal theory methods in multispectral remote sensing. John Wiley & Sons

  • Li M, Zang S, Zhang B, Li S, Wu C (2014) A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. Eur J Remote Sens 47:389–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2014) Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons

  • Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28:823–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Zhao Y, Yang K, Chen K, Pan M, Zhou X (2018) Dianchi lake watershed impervious surface area dynamics and their impact on lake water quality from 1988 to 2017. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29643–29653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Fu T, Blaschke T, Li M, Tiede D, Zhou Z, Ma X, Chen D (2017a) Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6:51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Li M, Ma X, Cheng L, du P, Liu Y (2017b) A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 130:277–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendiratta P, Gedam S (2018) Assessment of urban growth dynamics in Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India using object-based image analysis for medium-resolution data. Appl Geogr 98:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA (2014) Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens Environ 148:42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Phiri D, Morgenroth J (2017) Developments in Landsat land cover classification methods: a review. Remote Sens 9:967

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Zhou W, Yan J et al (2015) Comparing machine learning classifiers for object-based land cover classification using very high resolution imagery. Remote Sens 7:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction, 5th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DA, Gardner M, Church R, Ustin S, Scheer G, Green RO (1998) Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains using multiple endmember spectral mixture models. Remote Sens Environ 65:267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Samal DR, Gedam SS (2015) Monitoring land use changes associated with urbanization: an object based image analysis approach. Eur J Remote Sens 48:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonecker ET, Jennings DB, Garofalo D (2001) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces: a review. Remote Sens Rev 20:227–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Wang C, Guo H, Shang R (2017) A modified normalized difference impervious surface index (MNDISI) for automatic urban mapping from Landsat imagery. Remote Sens 9:942

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Zhao X, Wu M, Wang C (2018) Extracting urban impervious surface from WorldView-2 and airborne LiDAR data using 3D convolutional neural networks. J Indian Soc Remote Sens:1–12

  • Thenkabail PS (2015) Remotely sensed data characterization, classification, and accuracies, 1st edn. CRC Press

  • Titiz K (2017) Eskisehir Sanayi Odasi. In: Eskisehir Sanayi Odasi. http://www.eso.org.tr/en/index.php?page=arsiv/index&id=1. Accessed 22 Nov 2018

  • Trimble (2014) eCognition Developer 9.0–Reference Book

  • TUIK (2018) http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed 18 Dec 2018

  • USGS (2018) Landsat imagery: a unique resource. https://www.fort.usgs.gov/sites/landsat-imagery-unique-resource/landsat-imagery-unique-resource. Accessed 12 Nov 2018

  • Verbeeck K, Hermy M, Van Orshoven J (2012) External geo-information in the segmentation of VHR imagery improves the detection of imperviousness in urban neighborhoods. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18:428–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sens Environ 86:370–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ji W, Yu X, Xu X, Jiang D, Wang Z, Zhuang D (2014) The impact of urbanization on the annual average temperature of the past 60 years in Beijing. Adv Meteorol 2014:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Gang C, Li X, Chen Y, Li J (2015) Application of a normalized difference impervious index (NDII) to extract urban impervious surface features based on Landsat TM images. Int J Remote Sens 36:1055–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei C, Blaschke T (2018) Pixel-wise vs. object-based impervious surface analysis from remote sensing: correlations with land surface temperature and population density. Urban Sci 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Weih RC, Riggan ND (2010) Object-based classification vs. pixel-based classification: comparative importance of multi-resolution imagery. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 38:C7

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng Q (2012) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sens Environ 117:34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Murray AT (2003) Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ 84:493–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhao Y, Zhong K, Ruan H, Liu X (2016) Coupling modified linear spectral mixture analysis and soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) models to simulate surface runoff: application to the main urban area of Guangzhou, China. Water 8:550

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Liu J, Xu J (2018) Extraction of high-precision urban impervious surfaces from sentinel-2 multispectral imagery via modified linear spectral mixture analysis. Sensors 18:2873

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan F, Bauer ME (2007) Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 106:375–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanter K (2018) Landsat 8 data users handbook | Landsat missions. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-8-data-users-handbook. Accessed 12 Nov 2018

  • Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24:583–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Weng Q, Lin H, Zhang Y (2015a) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in tropical and subtropical areas. CRC Press

  • Zhang Y, Ren J, Jiang J (2015b) Combining MLC and SVM classifiers for learning based decision making: analysis and evaluations. Comput Intell Neurosci 2015:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Lin H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Fang C (2016) Mapping urban impervious surface with dual-polarimetric SAR data: An improved method. Landsc Urban Plan 151:55–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing satellite data. We express our sincere thanks to Dr. Kaan Kalkan for his useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SID conceptualized, collected the data, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. ZYA and UA participated in the analysis and interpretation of data. SID, ZYA, and UA reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayed Ishaq Deliry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deliry, S.I., Avdan, Z.Y. & Avdan, U. Extracting urban impervious surfaces from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data for urban planning and environmental management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 6572–6586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4

Keywords

Navigation