Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese green supply chain research hotspots and frontiers

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green supply chain (GSC), one of the most vital sub-topics of sustainable development, indicates people provoking on the rationality of business practices and resource consumption patterns. Under the background of economy globalization, developing countries, especially China, severely affected by green barriers became the global focus. A systematic review of articles about GSC which published in leading journals of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China Knowledge Resource Infrastructure (CNKI) is proposed for exploring publishing trends, the distribution of authors and journals, research topics, and hotspots and predicting frontiers by utilizing VOSviewer, Sci2, and CiteSpace. The results show that (1) there are differences in the attention of GSC between international and Chinese academia. (2) “Green” is referred to environmental friendly practices in international academia. Scholars advocate to promote management to strengthen cooperation among GSC members and boost technology investment to improve the comprehensive performance; however, specific practices such as “low-carbon,” “emission reduction,” “recycling,” and “remanufacture” are referred to environmental friendly behaviors in Chinese academia. Scholars expect to avoid enterprises’ short-term profit compression relying on government subsidies and make contracts to share environment protection cost equally out for ensuring GSC stable operation. (3) Exploring collaboration among GSC members using complex operation research and artificial intelligence will be international research frontier. Relevant papers are to provide Chinese research with merely innovation in methodology. Besides, the “government-enterprise-university-research institute-customer-economy” management mode proposed by development countries like China will enrich the international GSC research scope, leading international GSC knowledge structure to change. The contribution of this study is to afford reference for future research on GSC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers for their insightful and intelligent suggestions with the manuscript, and Xinyu Zhou wish to thank Guangjun Song, his mother for her encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Xinyu Zhou, methodology: Xinyu Zhou, formal analysis: Xinyu Zhou, resources: Xinyu Zhou, data curation: Xinyu Zhou, writing-original draft preparation: Xinyu Zhou, writing-review and editing: Xinyu Zhou and Xiaoqi Ma: visualization, Xinyu Zhou: validation Xiaoqi Ma and Tuochen Li.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Li, T. & Ma, X. A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese green supply chain research hotspots and frontiers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 6302–6323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11947-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11947-x

Keywords

Navigation