Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The policy effect of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading efficiency in China: analysis from the perspective of government regulation and public environmental demands

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial transformation and upgrading is an important step for China to carry out cleaner production and achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. With the help of green finance, we can optimize the allocation of financial resources and promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure. In order to explore the impact efficiency and policy effect of green finance on industrial transformation and upgrading in China, through the establishment of VAR model and super-efficiency DEA model, the relationship between green finance and industrial transformation and upgrading and its impact on efficiency are studied. In addition, the Tobit regression model is used to empirically test the impact of public environmental demands, government regulations, and their interaction terms on the efficiency of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading. The results show that the overall efficiency of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading is high, but it shows a downward trend, which may be due to the unbalanced development of the green financial system, information asymmetry, and the absence of enterprises from regulation. The impact coefficient of input-oriented government regulation is significantly negative, which indicates that increasing the investment in pollution control may encourage polluting enterprises’ emission behavior to obtain benefits. The impact of performance-oriented government regulation and public environmental demands on efficiency is not significant, which indicates that the supervision and binding force of enterprises are insufficient. Public environmental demands and input government regulations have significant synergistic governance advantages, indicating that the government should enhance the regulatory intensity of differentiated policies. The study provides a reference for the government to enhance the intensity of policy regulation and establish a diversified environmental governance system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sets used or analyzed in the current study are available from corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  • Cai H (2015) Research on the impact of green credit on China’s industrial transformation and upgrading under the new normal [J]. Friends of Accounting 13:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng d, Li g (2017) Current situation and trend of environmental regulatory intensity measurement [J]. Econ Manag Res 38(08):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenghui Z, Xie M, Tian H, Wang G (2016) “Greening China’s Financial System”, Development Research Center of the State Council. The logic and framework of green finance development in China [J]. Financ Forum 21(02):17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui H, Wang R, Wang H (2020) An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game. J Clean Prod 269:121799

  • Ding J (2019) The relations study on green finance and upgrading of industrial structure in China - based on grey correlation analysis model[C]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education, Culture and Social Development (ICECSD 2019)

  • Dong X, Fu Y (2018) Spatial temporal dimension analysis of green finance development and influencing factors. Statistics and Decision Making 34(20):94–98

  • Du L, Bo L (2012) Using carbon financial system to promote the adjustment and upgrading of industrial structure [J]. Econ 06:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcone PM (2020) Environmental regulation and green investments: the role of green finance [J]. Green Econ 14(2):159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone PM et al (2018) Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition: a discursive approach to assess landscape pressures on the Italian financial system [J]. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 127(Feb.):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Lin F (2019) Research on regional differences and influencing factors of green finance development in China [J]. Wuhan Financ 07:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhad T-H, Yoshino N (2019) The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment. Finance Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.016

  • Fu J, Liu Y (2020) Practical exploration of green bonds boosting industrial transformation in Dawan district of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao [J]. Environ Prot 48(12):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S, Zhao, L, The knowns and unknowns of Chinand green finance. The Sustainable Infrastructure Imperative: Financing for Better Growth and Development [C]. New Climate Economy, London and Washington, DC, 2017

  • Guangda Y (2009) Green investment, green capital and its value [J]. Discuss Mod Econ 11:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianhui H (2016) Can high-intensity environmental regulation promote the upgrading of industrial structure?--research from the perspective of classification of environmental regulations [J]. Environ Econ Res 1(02):76–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin F, Jing H, Wu Q (2021) Research on the efficiency and influencing factors of digital inclusive finance in adjusting the welfare difference between urban and rural residents [J]. Financ Theory Pract 03:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing X (2020) Urbanization, environmental regulation and industrial structure optimization--an empirical study based on panel data of the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J/OL]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University 49(03):119–128. https://doi.org/10.19503/j.cnki.1000-2529.2020.03.015

  • John T, et al. (2003) Sustainable finance and banking—the financial sector and the future of the planet: Marcel Jeucken, Earthscan, London, 2001, 29.95 (Hardback). Environ Sci Policy 6(2):191–191

  • Kumari RL (2012) Enhancing SMEs access to green finance [J]. Int J Market Financ Serv Manag Res 1(7):22–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Labatt S (2002) Environmental finance: a guide to environmental risk assessment and financial products [J]. Transplant 66(8):405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine R (1997) Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda [J]. J Econ Lit 35(2):688–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q (2013) Environmental regulation and industrial structure adjustment--theoretical analysis and empirical research based on Baumol model. Econ Rev 2013(05):100–107

  • Li H, Qing Z (2018) Environmental regulation, resource endowment and urban industrial transformation: a comparative analysis of resource-based cities and non-resource-based cities [J]. Econ Res J 53(11):182–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zang R (2020) Environmental regulation and innovation of enterprise pollution control: based on multi-agent model [J]. Ind Technol Econ 39(07):137–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wu X, Zhang F (2015) A method for analyzing pollution control policies: application to SO2 emissions in China [J]. Energy Econ 49:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Xu X, Zheng Y (2019) Impact of environmental regulation intensity on China’s industrial total factor energy efficiency: an empirical study based on panel data of 30 provinces from 2003 to 2016 [J]. Manag Rev 31(12):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Tan J (2020) Financial development, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China. Resour Policy 66:101642

  • Li Y, Hu H, Hao L (2020) An empirical analysis of the impact of green credit on the upgrading of industrial structure in China: based on the panel data of Chinese province [J]. Econ Probl 01:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Yonghui L, Hong C (2020) How green credit affects bank financial performance: a perspective of regional green development heterogeneity [J]. J Guizhou Univ Finance Econ 03:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Liu B, Zheng S (2019) Environmental regulation and industrial transformation and upgrading: based on the 11th Five-Year Plan emission reduction policy DID test [J]. China Soft Sci 05:40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J (2015) On the construction of China’s green financial system [J]. Financ Forum 20(05):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Hu B (2019) Relationship between environmental pollution and industrial structure upgrading in eastern coastal areas: a test based on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis [J]. Resour Ind 21(01):39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai J, Xu F (2015) Research on the influencing factors of green finance in China based on joint analysis [J]. Macroecon Res 05:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Roy S, Sengupta A (2009) Environmental regulations and economic activity: influence on market structure. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1(1):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minglong Z (2020) Research on the spatial effect of green investment on high quality economic development in the process of marketization--an empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model [J]. J Guizhou Univ Finance Econ 04:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Z, Liu X (2014) Environmental regulation, industrial structure adjustment and regional economic development [J]. Econ 07:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A (2016) Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 5(3):142–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren D (2020) The Youth Research Group of Guiyang Central Sub-branch of People’s Bank of China. Policy-driven or market-driven?--a study on the development of green finance based on text mining [J]. Southwest Financ 04:78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar J (1998) Environmental finance: Linking two world. Financial Innovations for Biodiversity Bratislava

  • Song S, Xiufeng F (2017) The impact of bilateral environmental regulation on inter-regional transfer of polluting industries in China [J]. Econ J 34(02):99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su R, Zhao X, Cheng H (2019) Mechanism and path analysis of green finance supporting the development of green industry [J]. J Financ Account 11:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S (2019) Green finance strategy and sustainable development in China. Finance 24–25. https://doi.org/10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2019.18.025

  • Tang Y, Ding J (2018) Research on China’s green finance development promoting industrial structure transformation and upgrading [J]. J Shihezi Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed) 32(03):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao A, Xu J (2016) Research on the non-linear relationship between financial development and industrial structure upgrading based on threshold model [J]. Econ Longitude Weft 33(02):84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsten B, Levine R, Loayza N (2000) Finance and the sources of growth. J Financ Econ 58:261–300

  • Wang H (2016) Comparison and selection of environmental regulation policy tools in China: an empirical study based on Bayesian model average (BMA) method [J]. China Popul Resour Environ 26(09):132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2019) Research on driving factors and progress of green finance development in China [J]. Econ Reform 05:136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hangxiang J (2017) Analysis on the path of boosting the development of low-carbon industry with green finance [J]. Wuhan Finance 04:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Pan Y (2018) The non-linear effect of financial development on industrial upgrading: a comparative analysis of urban agglomerations in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta [J]. Econ Geogr 38(09):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Tao S (2019) The impact of environmental regulation on the efficiency of China’s regional green economy based on super efficiency DEA model [J]. Ecol Econ 35(11):131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yi S (2020) Influencing factors of China’s energy conservation and emission reduction efficiency from the perspective of green development: an empirical study based on super efficiency DEA and Tobit model [J]. Manag Rev 32(10):59–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Yu N (2020) Efficiency evaluation of financial environmental protection expenditure in Shandong Province Based on super efficiency SBM-DEA model [J]. Econ Manag Rev 36(02):113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhi Q (2016) The role of green finance in environmental protection: two aspects of market mechanism and policies [J]. Energy Procedia 104:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei P, Yu Y (2017) Impact of environmental regulation on industrial structure upgrading of manufacturing industry--system GMM analysis based on provincial dynamic panel data [J]. Explor Econ Prob 09:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen S, Zhang Y (2020). Financial development, FDI Spillover and economic growth efficiency. World Econ Res 2020 (11): 87–102; 136-137

  • Xia T, Li M (2019) Environmental protection investment, policy support and green finance efficiency [J]. Technol Econ Manag Res 07:68–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Guang N (2017) Empirical research on the influencing factors of China's green finance development from the perspective of sustainable development. Journal of Jinling University of Science and Technology (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION) 31(03):10–14

  • Yan C, Li T, Lan W (2016) Financial development, innovation and carbon dioxide emissions [J]. Financ Res 01:14–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Zhang K (2017) Can institutional “unlocking” release the vitality of green development of manufacturing industry?--evidence based on panel data of 28 industries from 2003 to 2014 [J]. East China Econ Manag 31(09):104–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Q, Zeng X, Yue J (2020) Industrial structure, environmental regulation and environmental quality: a theoretical and empirical analysis based on China’s provincial perspective [J]. Manag Rev 32(05):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2016) A study on the strategic interaction of inter-regional environmental regulation--interpretation of the universal incomplete implementation of environmental regulation [J]. China Ind Econ 07:74–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Wang Y (2019) The effect of green finance on energy sustainable development: a case study in China [J]. Emerg Mark Financ Trade:1–20

  • Zhang H, Feng C, Shi R (2017) Green development: government and public power. J Shanghai Univ Finance Econ 39(11):15–28

  • Zhang J, Yu L, Bi X, Pan J (2016) Media supervision, environmental regulation and enterprise green investment. J Shanghai Univ Finance Econ 18 (05):91–103

Download references

Funding

This study received financial support from the 13th five year plan of Educational Science in Hunan Province: “One belt, one road” strategy based on system simulation, the internationalization of higher education, Project No. XJK17QGD018; Project of Hunan social science achievement appraisal committee in 2020: “One belt, one road” along the line of green mineral resources corridor construction and interest sharing mechanism, Project No. XSP20YBC223; Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province in 2018: “Research on China’s metal resources security evaluation and management policy under the new normal”, Project No. 18YBQ136.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China

    Beibei Gu & Fang Chen

  2. School of Business, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China

    Kun Zhang

Authors
  1. Beibei Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

1. Beibei Gu is responsible for topic selection, data search, and article writing;

2. Fang Chen is responsible for analyzing the data;

3. Kun Zhang is responsible for organizing ideas and honing words.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical approval is not required for this article because it does not address ethical issues.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, B., Chen, F. & Zhang, K. The policy effect of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading efficiency in China: analysis from the perspective of government regulation and public environmental demands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 47474–47491 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation