Abstract
CSCL systems which follow the dual-interaction spaces paradigm support the synchronous construction and discussion of shared artifacts by distributed or colocated small groups of learners. The most recent generic dual-interaction space environments, either model based or component based, can be deeply customized by teachers for supporting different collaborative learning tasks and different ways of performing them. This work stresses the importance of basing customization decisions on a socio-cognitive interpretation of how learners interact in a given learning situation. The central contribution of this article is a methodological approach for conducting qualitative interaction analysis oriented toward the improvement of the supporting environment which can be applied to any learning task and any environment configuration. This “generic analysis approach” is organized into three levels. At the dialog level, a task-independent dialogical model is proposed for analyzing action/communication traces as “generalized conversations.” A graphical notation is provided for visualizing the syntactical characteristics of collaborative sessions. At the knowledge level, a typology of task-independent collaborative knowledge-building episode types that can occur during such generalized conversations is proposed. Thanks to that classification scheme, recurrent meaningful elements that structure the low-level descriptions can be detected and characterized. These regularities help to pass from local interpretations to a global interpretation of the whole process. At the action level, task-dependent socio-cognitive interpretations of why the collaborative learning process unfolds as observed are proposed. They constitute a firm basis for improving the customization of the generic environment in order to support learners more efficiently.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, M., Py, D., & Lemeunier, T. (2008). A learning environment for object-oriented modeling, supporting metacognitive regulations. In Proceedings 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 69–73). IEEE Computer Society.
Amelsvoort, M. A. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1293–1313.
Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17, 448–459.
Avouris N., Margaritis M., & Komis V. (2004). Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach. 2nd International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 13–18). Maceio, Brazil.
Baghaei, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2006). A constraint-based collaborative environment for learning UML class diagrams. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006, LNCS 4053 (pp. 176–186). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1996). Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 401–407). Lisbon, Portugal: Edicôes Colibri.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning.
Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427–435.
Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2007). The organization of collaborative math problem solving activities across dual interaction spaces. In C. Hmelo-Silver & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 107–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clark, H., & Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
Constantino-Gonzales, M. A., & Suthers, D. (2001). Coaching collaboration by comparing solutions and tracking participation. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 173–180). Maastricht, NL: Universiteit Maastricht.
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.
De Chiara, R., Di Matteo, A., Manno, I., & Scarano, V. (2007). CoFFEE: Cooperative Face2Face Educational Environment. In Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007). New York, NY.
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6–28.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford, U.K: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2005). Design principles for the support of modelling and collaboration in a technology-based learning environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 15(1/2), 30–55.
Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of communication in collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 447–470.
Farnham, S., Chesley, H. R., McGhee, D. E., Kawal, R., & Landau, J. (2000). Structured online interactions: Improving the decision-making of small discussion groups. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000 (pp. 299–308). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Fidas, C., Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2002). Collaborative problem solving using an open modeling environment. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 654–655). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fischer, G. (2003). Meta-design—beyond user-centered and participatory design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI 2003), Crete, Greece, 88–92.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. (2005). The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 170–179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Grigoriadou, M., & Samarakou, M. (2005). ACT: A web-based adaptive communication tool. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 180–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117–136). London: Springer Verlag.
Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D. (2005). Reusing IMS-LD formalized best practices in collaborative learning structuring. Advanced Technology for Learning, 2(3), 223–232.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Jermann, P. (2004). Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem-solving. Geneva: Dissertation, University of Geneva.
Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35–56.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267–286.
Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9, 449–474.
Landsman, S., & Alterman, R. (2003). Building Groupware on THYME. Technical Report CS-03-234. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge Education.
Lonchamp, J. (2006). Supporting synchronous collaborative learning: a generic, multi-dimensional model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 247–276.
Lonchamp, J. (2007a). Floor control in complex CSCL synchronous environments, In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (pp. 397–402). Barcelona, Spain.
Lonchamp, J. (2007b). Linking conversation and task objects in complex synchronous CSCL environments. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (pp. 281–288). Barcelona, Spain.
Lonchamp, J. (2008). Interaction analysis supporting participants’ self-regulation in a generic CSCL system. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), Times of convergence, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, LNCS 5192 (pp. 262–273). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
Maes, P. (1987). Concepts and experiments in computational reflection. Proceedings of the 2 nd ACM International Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (pp. 147–155). Orlando, Florida.
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago University Press.
Mühlenbrock, M. (2001). Action-based collaboration analysis for group learning. Amsterdam: Dissertations in Artificial Intelligence, IOS.
Mühlpfordt, M., & Stahl, G. (2007). The integration of synchronous communication across dual interaction spaces. In C. Hmelo-Silver & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 525–534). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nonaka, I., & Takeushi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation (pp. 61–85). New York: Oxford University.
Nosofsky, R. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700–708.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pfister, H.-R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 581–589). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: The Viking.
Pinkwart, N. (2003). A plug-in architecture for graph based collaborative modeling systems. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.), Shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 535–536). Amsterdam, NL: IOS.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: towards a post critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 51–70.
Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49–70.
Soller, A., Wiebe, J., & Lesgold, A. (2002). A machine learning approach to assessing knowledge sharing during collaborative learning activities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 128–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Stahl, G. (2007). Social practices of group cognition in virtual math teams. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practices. ICT and new artifacts—transformation of social and cultural practices: Pergamon.
Strijbos, J.-W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction, 17, 394–404.
Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29–48.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1–28.
Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Vatrapu, R., & Medina, R. (2007). An abstract transcript notation for analyzing interactional construction of meaning in online learning. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on the Systems Science (CD-ROM). IEEE Computer Society Press.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer-assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.
Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., & Sarmiento, J. (2006). Polyphonic Support for Collaborative Learning. In Y. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs, & E. Gómez-Sánchez (Eds.) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 12th International Workshop CRIWG 2006 (pp.132–139), LNCS 4154, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Savelsbergh, E., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671–688.
Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421–445.
Wee, J. D., & Looi, C. K (2007). Meaning-making paths as a unit of analysis in synchronous chat environments: Application of the collaboration interaction model. In Proceedings of the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference, Singapore, May 2007.
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.
Zumbach, J., Muehlenbrock, M., Jansen, M., Reimann, P., & Hoppe, H.-U. (2002). Multidimensional tracking in virtual learning teams. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 650–651). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lonchamp, J. A three-level analysis of collaborative learning in dual-interaction spaces. Computer Supported Learning 4, 289–317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9068-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9068-6