Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group formation based on learning styles: can it improve students’ teamwork?

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work explores the impact of teacher-led heterogeneous group formation on students’ teamwork, based on students’ learning styles. Fifty senior university students participated in a project-based course with two key organizational features: first, a web system (PEGASUS) was developed to help students identify their learning styles and distribute them to heterogeneous groups. Second, group facilitation meetings were introduced as a technique to help students reflect on their weak/strong traits and employ appropriate roles in their group. The study research questions focused mainly on students’ attitudes regarding the learning style-based group formation approach. By applying qualitative research method students’ views were recorded about the impact of styles awareness and group heterogeneity on group collaboration and possible benefits and drawbacks related to the style-based grouping approach. Evaluation data revealed that students gradually overcame their initial reservations for the innovative group formation method and were highly benefited since styles heterogeneity within the group emphasized complementarities and pluralism in students’ ways of thinking. Overall, this work provides evidence that the adoption of learning styles theories in practice can be facilitated by systems for automated group formation and supportive group facilitation meetings that help avoiding the trivial and discouraging approach of using learning styles to simply label students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerlind, G. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dujaily, A., & Ryu, H. (2007). Personality and collaborative learning experience. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, ICALT 2007, Niigata, Japan, pp. 619–621.

  • Alfonseca, E., Carro, R., Martin, E., Ortigosa, A., & Paredes, P. (2006). The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: A case study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3–4), 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Management Association. (2010). American Management Association Critical Skills Survey. http://www.p21.org/documents/Critical%20Skills%20Survey%20Executive%20Summary.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2010.

  • American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign.. Washington, DC: Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning. Buckingham: SRHE Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. H., & Herbert, F. J. (1997). The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development, 16, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E., Cristea, A., Stewart, C., & Brailsford, T. (2005). Patterns in authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia: A taxonomy of learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. J. (Ed.). (2002). Classics in the person-centered approach. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine, G., & Caine, R. N. (1991). Making connections. Teaching and the human brain. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulopoulos, C., & Papanikolaou, K. (2007). A group formation tool in e-learning context. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, Patras, Greece.

  • Coffield, F. J., Moseley, D. V., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools, E., Evans, C., & Redmond, J. (2009). Using styles for more effective learning in multicultural and e-learning environments. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daradoumis, T., Guitert, M., Gimenez, F., Marques, J., & Lloret, T. (2002). Supporting the composition of effective virtual groups for collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the international conference on computers in education (ICCE 2002) (pp. 332–336). Auckland, New Zealand: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • De Abreu Dos Reis, C. R., Sastre Castillo, M. A., & Roig Dobo′n, S. (2007). Diversity and business performance: 50 years of research. Service Business, 1, 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bello, T. C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning style models: Variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation and the research behind them. Reading, Writing Learning Disabilities, 6, 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEMOS. (2005). About learning: Report of the learning working group, London.

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, T., & Hafner, W. (2008). Building a framework to support project-based collaborative learning experiences in an asynchronous learning network. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparinatou, A., & Grigoriadou, M. (2008). The impact of different learning styles on learners’ studying preferences in the domain of computer local networks. In: Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age, Freiburg, Germany.

  • Grigoriadou, M., Papanikolaou, K., & Gouli, E. (2006). Investigating how to group students based on their learning styles. Workshop on web-based education and learning styles. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, ICALT 2006, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, pp. 1139–1140.

  • Gross Davis, B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, W. (1998). Global mind change: The promise of the 21st century (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., Price, K., Gavin, J., & Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C. (1998). Why isn’t cooperative learning used to teach science? BioScience, 48(7), 553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, N. (1987). Creativity, learning, and the specialized brain in the context of education for gifted and talented children. Adapted from an address to the 7th world conference on gifted and talented children, Salt Lake City, Utah.

  • Herrmann, N. (1990). The creative brain. North Carolina: Brain Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hishina, M., Okada, R., & Suzuki, K. (2005). Group formation for web-based collaborative leaning with personality information. International Journal on e-learning, 4(3), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. R. (1959). Homogeneity and member personality and its effect on group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 58, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, R. (1996). Use of decision models in a diverse learning environment. The CAL POLY Pomona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol., 9, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, R. (1998). Diversity of introductory students’ learning styles. The CAL POLY Pomona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, R. (2000). The relationship between university students’ problem solving styles, cultural values, and ethics. The CAL POLY Pomona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, R., & Karayan, J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between gender and problem solving styles. In Proceedings of the American accounting association 36th western region annual meeting, pp. 6–15.

  • Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. M., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences: Learning and instruction. Hillsdale: N.J. Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jules, C. (2007). Diversity of member composition and team learning in organizations. Dissertation. Case Western Reserve University. http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Jules%20Claudy.pdf?case1184281409. Accessed 15 December 2010.

  • Karayan, J., & Hulme, R. (2003). Better teaching through learning styles awareness: A tax example. In Proceedings of the CSULB college of business administration symposium (Vol. 9).

  • Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In NASSP’s student learning styles: Diagnosing and proscribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principles.

  • King, A. (1994). Self-assessment of thinking and problem solving. The International Journal of Career Management, 6(5), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning. Annals of Information Systems, 4, 344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb learning style inventory. Boston: Hay Resources Direct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, L., Cornwell, T., & Williams, L. (2006). Personality types, learning styles, and an agile approach to software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, Houston, Texas.

  • Lewis, L. K., & Hayward, P. A. (2003). Choice-based learning: Student reactions in an undergraduate organizational communication course. Communication Education, 52(2), 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M., Hulme, R., & Karayan, J. (2000). Reaching AIS students with diverse cognitive styles: A flowcharting project as an example. Review of Business Information Systems, 4(4).

  • Martin, E., & Paredes, P. (2004). Using learning styles for dynamic group formation in adaptive collaborative hypermedia systems. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on web-engineering, Munich, pp. 188–198.

  • Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understanding of reality. In E. Ryymin (Ed.), Teachers’ intelligent networks, Academic dissertation, Aug. 2008, University of Tampere.

  • Marton, F. (1992). Phenomenography and “the art of teaching all things to all men”. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, T. (2005). Stage2: Learner-centred pedagogy: Individual differences between learners. JISC e-Learning Models Desk Study. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Stage%202%20Learning%20Styles%20%28Version%201%29.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2008.

  • Menaker, E., & Coleman, S. (2007). Learning styles again: Where is empirical evidence? In Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, Florida, Paper No. 7426.

  • Merrill, D. (2000). Instructional strategies and learning styles: Which takes precedence? In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenbrock, M. (2006). Learning group formation based on learner profile and context. International Journal on e-learning, 2(1), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs type indicator manual. Princeton, NJ.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, C. Y., Oliphant, G. C., & Oliphant, R. J. (2002). Project team formation processes: Student attitudes and experiences in nine alternative methods. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 3.

  • Ornek, F. (2008). An overview of a theoretical framework of phenomenography in qualitative education research: An example from physics education research. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2).

  • Petress, K. (2004). The benefits of group study. Education, 124(4), 587–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp, E. (1992). Managing your career. College Edition of the National Employment Weekly, 7–11.

  • Rayner, S. (2007). A teaching elixir or best-fit pedagogy? Do learning styles matter? Support for Learning, 22(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorization of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 7(1–2), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Sussex: Capstone Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichter, J. (1997). Lecture 2000: More than a course across wires. Teleconference—The Business Communications Magazine, 16(6), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, M., & Okba, E. (2006). Teamwork as a new sustainable pedagogy for teaching architectural design. Ain Shams University international conference, Cairo, pp. 181–192.

  • Summers, J. J., Beretvas, S. N., Svinicki, M. D., & Gorin, J. S. (2005). Evaluating collaborative learning and community. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(3), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. J. (1995). Learning styles: A review of the literature. Document no. ed 387 067, Educational Research Information Centre (ERIC).

  • Uljens, M. (1996). On the philosophical foundation of phenomenography. In G. Dall’Alba & B. Hasselgren (Eds.), Reflections on phenomenography (pp. 105–130). Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive, and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voges, A. (2005). An evaluative analysis of a whole brain learning programme for adults. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pretoria, April 2005, http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08112005-153748/unrestricted/00front.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2006.

  • Wang, D.-Y., Lin, S., & Sun, C.-T. (2007). DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1997–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2005). Things have to change: The necessary evolution of initial teacher training. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the British Educational Association, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd.

  • Webster, R., & Sudweeks, F. (2006). Enabling effective collaborative learning in networked virtual environments. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, pp. 1437–1441.

  • Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazici, H. J. (2005). A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education and Training, 47(3), 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, PO Box 114, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Maria Kyprianidou, Stavros Demetriadis, Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos & Andreas Pombortsis

Authors
  1. Maria Kyprianidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stavros Demetriadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Pombortsis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Kyprianidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyprianidou, M., Demetriadis, S., Tsiatsos, T. et al. Group formation based on learning styles: can it improve students’ teamwork?. Education Tech Research Dev 60, 83–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9215-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9215-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation