Skip to main content
Log in

Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students

  • Special Issue on Personalized Learning
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today various types of tablet computers are used, including iPad and Android Tablets. These individual portable digital devices can be used as e-book readers to support mobile personalized learning. Though many studies have investigated e-books by targeting undergraduate students, yet less attention has been paid to children. Therefore, an Interactive E-book Learning System (IELS) was developed for elementary school students in this study. The interactive principles in multimedia learning were adopted to empower students’ personalized learning experiences with e-books. Meanwhile, in order to meet student’s learning needs, a group of in-service teachers were consulted for acquiring their domain expertise. Personalized learning functions, such as e-annotation and bookmarks, content searching, and learning process tracking, were designed to reinforce student learning. Two investigations were conducted for evaluation of the developed system. The first investigation was conducted with 166 elementary school students to evaluate the usability and functionality of the developed system and the feedback from the students. It was found that the usability and functionality of the developed system were well-suited for most of the students. The second investigation was to evaluate the learning effect of the developed system. The results showed that using an e-book or printed book made no significant difference to the students’ reading accuracy; however, the learning process tracking technique of IELS can provide detailed logs about the actual learning processes which can be used by the system to provide further assistance to individual learner. This study concludes that such a tailor-made e-book learning system could achieve a better personalized learning experience for elementary school students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, J., Ortega, L., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). E-book usage in pure and applied sciences. Science & Technology Libraries, 29(1–2), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt, P., Rump, K. M., Shealy, S. E., & Cook, S. A. (2009). Shared book reading: When and how questions affect young children’s word learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloice, M., Kreuzthaler, M., Simonic, K.-M., & Holzinger, A. (2010). On the paradigm shift of search on mobile devices: Some remarks on user habits. In G. Leitner, M. Hitz, & A. Holzinger (Eds.), Human–computer interaction in work & learning, life & leisure, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6389, pp. 493–496). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P. (1977). Toward a theory of reading comprehension and rauding. Reading Research Quarterly, 13(1), 8–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P. (1983). Is reading rate constant or flexible? Reading Research Quarterly, 18(2), 190–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, D. (2006). Introducing Windows presentation foundation. Retrieved January 18, 2011 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa663364.aspx.

  • Coyle, K. (2008). E-Reading. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 160–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, M. T. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2009). Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3), 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. H. (2010). The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C. A. (2007). Reading rate in L1 mandarin Chinese and L2 English across five reading tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 372–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, J. W., & Temple, C. (1986). Understanding reading problems (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A. H., Connor, C. M., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Untangling the effects of shared book reading: Multiple factors and their associations with preschool literacy outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, A. (2005). Usability engineering for software developers. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., & Ziefle, M. (2011a). Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(9), 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, A., Searle, G., & Wernbacher, M. (2011b). The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability and accessibility engineering. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10(3), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourcade, J. P., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Rose, A., Farber, A., & Takayama, Y. (2003). The International Children’s Digital Library: Viewing digital books online. Interacting with Computers, 15(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y.-M., Chiu, P.-S., Liu, T.-C., & Chen, T.-S. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2291–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, 52(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2011). A systematic approach for learner group composition utilizing U-learning portfolio. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. S., Kress, R. A., & Pikulski, J. J. (1987). Informal reading inventories (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerawalla, L., Pearce, D., Yuill, N., Luckin, R., & Harris, A. (2008). “I’m keeping those there, are you”? The role of a new user interface paradigm—Separate Control of Shared Space (SCOSS)—in the collaborative decision-making process. Computers & Education, 50(1), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups. Computers & Education, 50(1), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P., Lam, S. L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. C. (2009). Reader response meets new literacies: Empowering readers in online learning communities. Reading Teacher, 62(8), 638–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. T., Huang, Y. M., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1483–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Retrieved January 19, 2011 from http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0110_measuring_with_use.html.

  • McLay, B. (2007). Reading rate: Research versus teaching. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from http://www.learningassistance.com/2007/november/printables/readingrateprint.html.

  • Ministry of Education, Republic of China. (2000). A survey report of Chinese common words for elementary school. Retrieved April 25, 2011 from http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/M0001/primary/shindex.htm?open.

  • Ministry of Education, Republic of China. (2010). Overview of the intelligent Taiwan—manpower cultivation project. Retrieved April 25, 2011 from http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=10164&ctNode=784&mp=1.

  • Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., & de Jong, M. T. (2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 979–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008). Added value of dialogic parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education & Development, 19(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSDN. (2010). FlowDocumentReader.Find Method. Retrieved January 24, 2011, from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.controls.flowdocumentreader.find(v=VS.90).aspx.

  • MSDN. (2011). Flow document overview. Retrieved January 24, 2011 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa970909.aspx.

  • Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2006). F-shaped pattern for reading web content. Retrieved November 5, 2010 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html.

  • Pattuelli, M. C., & Rabina, D. (2010). Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings, 62(3), 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qayyum, M. A. (2008). Capturing the online academic reading process. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasinski, T. V. (1999). Exploring a method for estimating independent, instructional, and frustration reading rates. Reading Psychology, 20(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasinski, T. V. (2000). Speed does matter in reading. Reading Teacher, 54(2), 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, G., Druin, A., Platner, M., Bederson, B., Hourcade, J. P., & Sherman, L. (2002). A visual search tool for early elementary science students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal-Drori, O., Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Klein, P. S. (2010). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: Effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 913–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Barbi, N. (2008). The effects of CD-ROM storybook reading on low SES kindergarteners’ emergent literacy as a function of learning context. Computers & Education, 51(1), 354–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A., Danby, S., Mallan, K., & Butler, C. (2010). Exploring young children’s web searching and technoliteracy. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straker, L., Pollock, C., & Maslen, B. (2009). Principles for the wise use of computers by children. Ergonomics, 52(11), 1386–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, J. B., & Henderson, M. (1943). Rate of reading and learning by reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 34(4), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Howell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children’s reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 720–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TCA. (2009). About e-reading. Retrieved April 25, 2011 from http://ereading.computex.biz/SinglePage.aspx?index=213.

  • Tung, F. W., & Deng, Y. S. (2006). Designing social presence in e-learning environments: Testing the effect of interactivity on children. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education learning powered by technology. Retrieved November 15, 2010 from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf.

  • Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T.-T., Huang, Y.-M., Chao, H.-C., & Park, J. H. (in press, uncorrected proof). Personlized English reading sequencing based on learning portfolio analysis. Information Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.021.

  • Yuill, N., Pearce, D., Kerawalla, L., Harris, A., & Luckin, R. (2009). How technology for comprehension training can support conversation towards the joint construction of meaning. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Council (NSC) and Ministry of Education, Taiwan, ROC, under Contracts No. NSC 99-2631-S-011-002, NSC 99-2631-S-006-001, NSC 100-2631-S-006-002, NSC 100-2511-S-006-015-MY3, NSC 100-2511-S-006-014-MY3 and the MOE 99-ICT innovative school plan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nian-Shing Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, YM., Liang, TH., Su, YN. et al. Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Education Tech Research Dev 60, 703–722 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6

Keywords

Navigation