Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does recreational computer use affect high school achievement?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, the relationship between student academic achievement and use of computers for fun and video gaming has been described from a multitude of perspectives, from positive, to negative, to neutral. However, recent research has indicated that computer use and video gaming may be positively associated with achievement, yet these studies have focused on small intact and qualitative samples. The purpose of the present study is to examine the association between academic achievement in high school and student use of computers for fun and video gaming using the large nationally representative ELS:2002 sample of students in grade 10 in 2002 and an independent effects two-level hierarchical linear model. Our results indicate that both student use of computers for fun and moderate levels of video gaming were positive and significant on cross-sectional reading and mathematics achievement assessments in high school, controlling for multiple covariates of achievement, but were not related to growth in mathematics from grade 10 to grade 12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173. doi:10.1037/a0018251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APA. (2005). Resolution on violence in video games and interactive media: American Psychological Association.

  • Archibald, S. (2006). Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., & Lee, V. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson, T. N. (2005). The remote, the mouse and the no. 2 pencil: The household media environment and academic achievement among third grade students. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J. (2009). Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just academic knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 609–629. doi:10.1108/09578230910981080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J. (2011). What’s in a grade? the multidimensional nature of what teacher assigned grades assess in high school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 141–159. doi:10(1080/13803611).2011.597112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers and Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., & Kilburn, J. (2010). Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in Eastern and Western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 174–178. doi:10.1037/a0018566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 182–188). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. CESifo Working Paper 1321. Munich: CESifo.

  • Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32(2), 433–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2010). Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Ruh Linder, J., & Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 5–22. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elvira, E.-F. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 2 Research methods in psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancox, R. J., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2005). Association of television viewing during childhood with poor educational achievement. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 614–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Nailing the coffin shut on doubts that violent video games stimulate aggression: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 179–181. doi:10.1037/a0018567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingles, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Rogers, J. E., Siegel, P. H., Stutts, E. S., & Owings, J. A. (2004). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingles, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Wilson, D., Burns, L. J., Currivan, D., Rogers, J. E., et al. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A. (2008). Adolescents and the internet. In D. Romer & P. Jamieson (Eds.), The changing portrayal of American youth in popular media, Annenberg public policy center at the University of Pennsylvania (pp. 377–410). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F. A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2006). Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 429–435. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Witt, E. A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2011). A longitudinal study of the effects of Internet use and videogame playing on academic performance and the roles of gender, race and income in these relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 228–239. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35–51. doi:10.1007/BF02504505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. (2010). Study: Too many video games may sap attention span—Health News—Health.com. Retrieved from http://news.health.com/2010/07/05/video-games-attention-span/.

  • Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2008). The effect of computer use on child outcomes. Unpublished Working Paper, The Harris School, The University of Chicago.

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nævdal, F. (2007). Home-PC usage and achievement in English. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1112–1121. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCES. (n.d.). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS:2002), from http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/.

  • OECD. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325–332. doi:10.1023/A:1025093225753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2000/Tracking-Online-Life. Accessed Dec 2011.

  • Pew. (2005). Digital divisions. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Digital-Divisions.aspx.

  • Pew. (2006). Internet evolution, internet penetration and impact. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Internet-Penetration-and-Impact.aspx.

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & duToit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating casual effects: Using experimental and observational designs (report from the Governing Board of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program). Washington, D C: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, B. G., & Doyle, K. O. (2004). The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 391–401. doi:10.1177/0002764204270277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS. (2010). SPSS Inc. (Version 19.0): IBM SPSS Inc.

  • Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 530–543. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2009). Accessing and analyzing national databases. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 105–122). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R., Facer, K., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2000). A new environment for education? The computer in the home. Computers and Education, 34(3–4), 195–212. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00045-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai, D., & Shore, B. M. (2005). How experts and novices search the web. Library and Information Science Research, 27(2), 222–248. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, J. (2004). Television viewing, computer game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of bed in secondary-school children. Sleep, 27(1), 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1993). Connected mathematics: Building concrete relationships with mathematical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Willoughby, T. (2008). A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls: Prevalence, frequency of use, and psychosocial predictors. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 195–204. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers and Education, 50(4), 1558–1571. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street, Box 67, New York, NY, 10027-6696, USA

    Alex J. Bowers

  2. The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Matthew Berland

Authors
  1. Alex J. Bowers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Berland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex J. Bowers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowers, A.J., Berland, M. Does recreational computer use affect high school achievement?. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 51–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9274-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9274-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation