Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to promote Chinese primary and secondary school teachers to use ICT to develop high-quality teaching activities

  • Cultural and Regional Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In China, teachers’ ability to adopt information and communication technology (ICT) when teaching is far from satisfying. Previous studies on teachers’ ability to integrate ICT and teaching in China ignored the factors in the process of teachers’ ICT application and lacked the systematic analysis of the factors. ICT application is affected by complex factors and thus needs to be systematically explored. This study surveyed 3730 Chinese primary and secondary school teachers, and adopted the environment-based design, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling to analyze the factors influencing teachers’ usage of ICT to develop teaching activities and proposed a model of the influencing factors of ICT usage. This model indicated that application willingness, application frequency, ICT-based teaching competence, helpfulness degree and application context are the five major factors that influence teachers’ usage of ICT to develop high-quality teaching activities. According to the status of teachers’ ICT application in China, this study suggested strengthening teachers’ willingness and enriching application contexts of ICT. Implications of this study will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education,56(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçayır, G. (2017). Why do faculty members use or not use social networking sites for education? Computers in Human Behavior,71, 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology,48(2), 552–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, H. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of new technologies: Improving literacy and engaging learners at risk of social exclusion in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education,63, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research,36(1), 111–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryderup, I. M., & Kowalski, K. (2002). The role of local authorities in the integration of ICT in learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18, 470–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. B., Chen, Z. Y., Kong, L., & Zeng, Y. (2005). Analysis of medical devices design requirements. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science,9(4), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. M., & Wang, Z. M. (2013). A study on the training of teachers for the compulsory education. Open Education Research,19(4), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirli, C. (2013). ICT usage of pre-service teachers: Cultural comparison for Turkey and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,13(2), 1095–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmans Epp, C. (2012). Developing a scale for assessing instructor attitudes towards open learner models. In E. Herder, K. Yacef, L. Chen, & S. Weibelzhal (Eds.), Workshop and poster proceedings of the 20th conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization (UMAP) 2012 (Vol. 872, pp. 1–4). Montreal, Canada: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-872/.

  • Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., Despres-Bedwward, A., & Wang, L. (2017). Resourceful Instructors and Students: Overcoming Barriers to Integrating Mobile Tools. In: R. Power, M. Ally, D. Cristol, & Palalas, Agnieszka (Eds.), IAmLearning: Mobilizing and supporting educator practice. IAmLearn. Retrieved from https://iamlearning.pressbooks.com/part/ch-3-resourceful-instructors-and-students-overcoming-barriers-to-integrating-mobile-tools/.

  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2007). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education,51(1), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology,42(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, M. C., & Dane, E. (1999). The classroom systems observation scale: Development of an instrument to assess classrooms using a systems perspective. Learning Environments Research,3(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior,68, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005–2011. Computers & Education,68(4), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education,49(4), 943–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockly, N. (2013). Designer learning: The teacher as designer of mobile-based classroom learning experiences. Monterey, CA, USA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education (TIRF). Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/designer-learning-the-teacher-as-designer-of-mobile-based-classroom-learning-experiences/.

  • Hsu, S. (2017). Developing and validating a scale for measuring changes in teachers’ ICT integration proficiency over time. Computers & Education,111, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Z., & Mcgrath, I. (2012). Integrating ICT into college English: An implementation study of a national reform. Education and Information Technologies,17(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julio, C. A., & Barbara, F. R. (2018). Emerging digital technologies come into the University: AR and VR. RIED- Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia.,21(2), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaddachi, B. (2017). ICT in Tunisian higher education: Integration still in its infancy. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education,14(1), 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. A. (2017). A study of teaching plan for the physical activity using ICT. In: K. Kuinam J, & J. Nikolai (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on information science and applications (pp. 770–776). Singapore: Springer.

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., & Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: A guide for teachers (ELT Research Papers No. 14.07). London, UK: British Council. Retrieved from http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/research-papers/mobile-pedagogy-english-language-teaching-guide-teachers.

  • Lai, C. L., Hwang, G. J., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). Differences between mobile learning environmental preferences of high school teachers and students in Taiwan: A structural equation model analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development,64(3), 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. S. (2014). The demand and trend of the development of deep integration of ICT and education. The Chinese Journal of ICT in Education,12, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Li, H. T., Shi, X. X., Hu, M., & Geng, X. N. (2015). Discussion on the dilemma and outlet of deep integration of ICT and education. China Information Technology Education,21, 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & He, L. (2017). Relationships of TPACK and Beliefs of Primary and Secondary Teachers in China. In: J. Liu, S. Nishimura, H. Zhang, Q. Jin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 international conference of educational innovation through technology (pp. 32–35). Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X. Q., & Huang, R. H. (2009). Investigation on attitude and behavior of ICT application of primary and secondary school teachers. China Educational Technology,9, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G., & Qu, Y. (2016). How to improve foreign language teachers’ application abilities of information technology in Big Data Era. In: T. Hu, & X. M. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on economics, social science, arts, education and management engineering (pp. 598–601). Huhhot, China: Atlantis Press.

  • Liu, X., Xu, Y., & Pange, J. (2016). Teachers’ use of PowerPoint in kindergarten: An empirical investigation in china. Education and Information Technologies,21(2), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. K., & Sass, D. A. (2010). Construct validation of the behavior and instructional management scale. Teaching & Teacher Education,26(5), 1124–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming, K. C. M., & Liu, S. H. X. (2015). Middle school English teachers’ attitude and motivation towards ICT-enabled teaching in China. In D. G. Sampson, R. Huang, G. Hwang, T. Liu, N. Chen, Kinshuk, C. Tsai (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 15th international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 328–329). Los Angeles, CA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). ICT in education Ten Year Development Plan. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201203/t20120313_133322.html

  • Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2012). A theoretical model of design creativity: Nonlinear design dynamics and mental stress-creativity relation. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science,16(3), 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J. (2013). ICT-mediated practice and constructivist practices: is this still the best plan for teachers’ uses of ICT? Technology Pedagogy & Education,22(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phirangee, K. (2013). Beyond the elementary classroom walls: Exploring the ways participation within Web 2.0 spaces are reshaping pedagogy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,22(3), 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review,94(2), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, J. (2006). ICT as a change agent of mathematics teaching in Swedish Secondary School. Kluwer Academic Publishers,11(1), 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education,54(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, P. (2015). Treatment allocation in trials: Stratified randomisation. BMJ,350, h978. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,28(7), 1248–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, L. (2015). Primary and secondary school teachers’ information technology training practice curriculum design and new construction of teaching material research. China Educational Technology,2, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education,44(3), 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tearle, P. (2004). A theoretical and instrumental framework for implementing change in ICT in education. Cambridge journal of education,34(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education,32(1), 328–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development,65, 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & Braak, J. V. (2014). Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education,72(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science,46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Zeng, Y. (2009). Asking the right questions to elicit product requirements. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,22(4), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, B., & Hansen, C. (2016). Data literacy and use for teaching. In P. Reimann, S. Bull, M. Kickmeier-Rust, R. Vatrapu, & B. Wasson (Eds.), Measuring and visualizing learning in the information-rich classroom (pp. 56–73). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. L. (2010). Structural equation modeling: operation and application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, A. T. (2013). Reflections on the integration of information technology and primary math under the new curriculum standard. Journal of Hunan First Normal College,13(4), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (2015). The investigation and research on the status of in-depth integration of ICT and teaching for primary and secondary school teachers. Journal of Teaching and Management: Theory,10, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Zheng, X. D., & Zhu, S. (2015). Several thoughts on the integration of ICT and school education from the perspective of technology diffusion. China Educational Technology,4, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, H., Deng, X., & Zeng, Y. (2014). Curriculum design using EBD methodology: Preliminary study of English education in Mid-west University of China. In: Y. Zeng, Y. Chen, S. Achiche, W. Shen, A. Awasthi, C. H. Chu, C. Rizzi, & C. Wang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on innovative design and manufacturing (pp. 282–287). Montréal, Québec: IEEE.

  • Zeng, Y. (2008). Recursive object model (ROM): Modelling of linguistic information in engineering design. Computers in Industry,59(6), 612–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y. (2015). Environment-based design (EBD): A methodology for transdisciplinary design+. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science,19(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., & Cheng, G. D. (1991). On the logic of design. Design Studies,12(3), 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Liu, M., Zhou, P., & Ma, J. (2014). The status’ assessment of primary and secondary teachers in ICT competency-based on the analysis of “ICT competency standards for primary and secondary teachers (trial)”. China Educational Technology,8, 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Xu, J., & Chen, M. (2017). Analysis of urban-rural discrepancies in primary and secondary school teachers’ ICT application ability in teaching and research in China. In: F. L. Wang, O. Au, K. K. Ng, J. Shang, & R. Kwan(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 international symposium on educational technology (pp. 131–134). Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the Humanities and Social Science’ Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (Project name: Research on a context-integrated polymorphic ubiquitous learning resource aggregation model, Project No.: 18YJC880005). We would also like to thank all the teachers who participated in this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants are in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Questionnaire on the status of teachers’ ICT application in primary and secondary schools

Appendix: Questionnaire on the status of teachers’ ICT application in primary and secondary schools

一、基本信息:请填写您的基本信息 (Basic information: Please fill in your basic information.)

1. 学校名称 (School name): ( )

2. 地址 (Address): ( )省 (Province) ( )市 (City) ( )区 (District)

3. 性别 (Gender): 男 (Male)( )女 (Female)( )

4. 学科 (Subject): ( )

5. 年级 (Grade): ( )

二、教师信息技术应用现状:请根据您的实际情况在对应的数字上打钩 (The status of teachers’ ICT application: Please tick the corresponding number according to your actual situation.)

题项 (Item)

非常不同意

(Strongly disagree)

不同意

(Disagree)

不确定

(Neither agree nor disagree)

同意

(Agree)

非常同意

(Strongly agree)

在教学中,我愿意使用多媒体设备。 (I like to use multimedia devices in teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

在教学中,我愿意使用数字化教学资源。 (I like to use digital resources in teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

在教学中,我愿意使用学科软件工具。 (I like to use disciplinary software in teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

在教学中,我愿意使用信息化课堂管理系统。 (I like to use ICT-based management systems in teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

网络课程在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use online courses in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

教学资源库在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use teaching resources from digital libraries in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

学术文献在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use academic literature in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

教学视频案例在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use teaching videos in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

微课在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use micro-lessons in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

网络教学平台在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use online teaching platforms in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

教学资源管理平台在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use information management platforms in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

教学资源共享平台在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use resource-sharing platforms in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

智能教学系统在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use intelligent teaching systems in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

远程视频会议系统在我的教师交流活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use video conference systems while communicating with other teachers.)

1

2

3

4

5

教学系统/平台在我的教师交流活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use teaching systems/platforms while communicating with other teachers.)

1

2

3

4

5

协同教学系统在我的教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use collaborative teaching systems in my teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

远程视频会议在我的协同教学活动中的应用比例很高。 (I often use video conferences in my collaborative teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

我应用信息技术开展教学活动的能力很高。 (I am competent to use ICT to develop teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

我的同事应用信息技术开展教学活动的能力很高。 (My colleagues are competent to use ICT to develop teaching activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

我应用信息技术开展教研活动的能力很高。 (I am competent to use ICT to develop teaching research activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

我的同事应用信息技术开展教研活动的能力很高。 (My colleagues are competent to use ICT to develop teaching research activities.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在备课环节中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my lesson preparation.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在课堂教学中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my classroom teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在课堂管理中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my classroom management.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在教学实验中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my teaching experiments.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在课外辅导中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my after-school tutoring.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在教学评价中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to my teaching assessment.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在教师交流讨论中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to teachers’ communication.)

1

2

3

4

5

信息技术在协同教学中对我的帮助很大。 (ICT is very helpful to collaborative teaching.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课前使用数字化教学系统。 (I often use digital teaching systems before class.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课堂中使用数字化教学系统。 (I often use digital teaching systems during class.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课后使用数字化教学系统。 (I often use digital teaching systems after class.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课前使用学科工具或学科教学软件。 (I often use disciplinary tools or teaching software before class.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课中使用学科工具或学科教学软件。 (I often use disciplinary tools or teaching software during class.)

1

2

3

4

5

我经常在课后使用学科工具或学科教学软件。 (I often use disciplinary tools or teaching software after class.)

1

2

3

4

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Zhou, C., Meng, C. et al. How to promote Chinese primary and secondary school teachers to use ICT to develop high-quality teaching activities. Education Tech Research Dev 67, 1593–1611 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09677-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09677-0

Keywords

Navigation