Skip to main content
Log in

Some results on the regularization of LSQR for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LSQR, a Lanczos bidiagonalization based Krylov subspace iterative method, and its mathematically equivalent conjugate gradient for least squares problems (CGLS) applied to normal equations system, are commonly used for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems. It is well known that LSQR and CGLS have regularizing effects, where the number of iterations plays the role of the regularization parameter. However, it has long been unknown whether the regularizing effects are good enough to find best possible regularized solutions. Here a best possible regularized solution means that it is at least as accurate as the best regularized solution obtained by the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) method. We establish bounds for the distance between the k-dimensional Krylov subspace and the k-dimensional dominant right singular space. They show that the Krylov subspace captures the dominant right singular space better for severely and moderately ill-posed problems than for mildly ill-posed problems. Our general conclusions are that LSQR has better regularizing effects for the first two kinds of problems than for the third kind, and a hybrid LSQR with additional regularization is generally needed for mildly ill-posed problems. Exploiting the established bounds, we derive an estimate for the accuracy of the rank k approximation generated by Lanczos bidiagonalization. Numerical experiments illustrate that the regularizing effects of LSQR are good enough to compute best possible regularized solutions for severely and moderately ill-posed problems, stronger than our theory predicts, but they are not for mildly ill-posed problems and additional regularization is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer F, Lukas M A. Comparing parameter choice for regularization of ill-posed problems. Math Comput Simul, 2011, 81: 1795–1841

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazán F S V, Borges L S. GKB-FP: An algorithm for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2010, 50: 481–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazán F S V, Cunha M C C, Borges L S. Extension of GKB-FP algorithm to large-scale general-form Tikhonov regularization. Numer Linear Algebra Appl, 2014, 21: 316–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergou E H, Gratton S, Tshimanga J. The exact condition number of the truncated singular value solution of a linear ill-posed problem. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2014, 35: 1073–1085

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Björck Å. A bidiagonalization algorithm for solving large and sparse ill-posed systems of linear equations. BIT Numer Math, 1988, 28: 659–670

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Björck Å. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1996

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Calvetti D, Golub G H, Reichel L. Estimation of the L-curve via Lanczos bidiagonalization. BIT Numer Math, 1999, 39: 603–619

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Calvetti D, Hansen P C, Reichel L. L-curve curvature bounds via Lanczos bidiagonalization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2002, 14: 20–35

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Calvetti D, Lewis B, Reichel L. On the choice of subspace for iterative methods for linear ill-posed problems. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 2001, 11: 1069–1092

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Calvetti D, Lewis B, Reichel L. GMRES, L-curve, and discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2002, 42: 44–65

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Calvetti D, Morigi S, Reichel L, et al. Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. J Comput Appl Math, 2000, 123: 423–446

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Calvetti D, Reichel L. Tikhonov regularization of large linear problems. BIT Numer Math, 2003, 43: 263–283

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung J, Nagy J G, O’Leary D P. A weighted GCV method for Lanczos hybrid regularization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2008, 28: 149–167

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Engl H W, Hanke M, Neubauer A. Regularization of Inverse Problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gazzola S. Regularization techniques based on Krylov methods for ill-posed linear systems. PhD Thesis. Padua: University of Padua, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gazzola S, Novati P. Multi-parameter Arnoldi-Tikhonov methods. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2013, 40: 452–475

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gazzola S, Novati P, Russo M R. On Krylov projection methods and Tikhonov regularization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2015, 44: 83–123

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanke M. Conjugate Gradient Type Methods for Ill-Posed Problems. Essex: Longman, 1995

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanke M. On Lanczos based methods for the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2001, 41: 1008–1018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen P C. Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1998

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen P C. Regularization tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3. Numer Algor, 2007, 46: 189–194

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen P C. Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2010

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hnetynková I, Plešinger M, Strakoš Z. The regularizing effect of the Golub-Kahan iterative bidiagonalization and revealing the noise level in the data. BIT Numer Math, 2009, 49: 669–696

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hofmann B. Regularization for Applied Inverse and Ill-posed Problems. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1986

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen T K, Hansen P C. Iterative regularization with minimum-residual methods. BIT Numer Math, 2007, 47: 103–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jia Z, Niu D. An implicitly restarted refined bidiagonalization Lanczos method for computing a partial singular value decomposition. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2003, 25: 246–265

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kilmer M E, O’Leary D P. Choosing regularization parameters in iterative methods for ill-posed problems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2001, 22: 1204–1221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis B, Reichel L. Arnoldi-Tikhonov regularization methods. J Comput Appl Math, 2009, 226: 92–102

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Z C, Huang H T, Wei Y M. Ill-conditioning of the truncated singular value decomposition, Tikhonov regularization and their applications to numerical partial differential equations. Numer Linear Algebra Appl, 2011, 18: 205–221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Neuman A, Reichel L, Sadok H. Algorithms for range restricted iterative methods for linear dicrete ill-posed problems. Numer Algor, 2012, 59: 325–331

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Novati P, Russo M R. A GCV based Arnoldi-Tikhonov regularization method. BIT Numer Math, 2014, 54: 501–521

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Leary D P, Simmons J A. A bidiagonalization-regularization procedure for large scale discretizations of ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Statist Comput, 1981, 2: 474–489

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Paige C C, Saunders M A. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Trans Math Soft, 1982, 8: 43–71

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Parlett B N. The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem. Philedaphia: SIAM, 1998

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Reichel L, Rodriguez G. Old and new parameter choice rules for discrete ill-posed problems. Numer Algor, 2013, 63: 65–87

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Stewart G W. Matrix Algorithms, vol. II: Eigensystems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2001

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Vogel C R. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2002

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB302400) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11371219). The authors thank the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments, which made the authors think over numerous issues deeply and improve the presentation of the paper considerably.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ZhongXiao Jia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Jia, Z. Some results on the regularization of LSQR for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems. Sci. China Math. 60, 701–718 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-015-0568-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-015-0568-4

Keywords

MSC(2010)

Navigation