Abstract
Ternary organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are fabricated with PBDB-T-2Cl:Y6 (1:1.2, wt/wt) as the host system and extra PC71BM as the third component. The PBDB-T-2Cl:Y6 based binary OPVs exhibit a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.49% with a short circuit current (JSC) of 24.98 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.868 V and a fill factor (FF) of 71.42%. A 16.71% PCE is obtained in the optimized ternary OPVs with PBDB-T-2Cl:Y6:PC71BM (1:1.2:0.2, wt/wt) active layer, resulting from the synchronously improved JSC of 25.44 mA cm−2, FF of 75.66% and the constant VOC of 0.868 V. The incorporated PC71BM may prefer to mix with Y6 to finely adjust phase separation, domain size and molecular arrangement in ternary active layers, which can be confirmed from the characterization on morphology, 2D grazing incidence small and wide-angle X-ray scattering, as well as Raman mapping. In addition, PC71BM may prefer to mix with Y6 to form efficient electron transport channels, which should be conducive to charge transport and collection in the optimized ternary OPVs. This work provides more insight into the underlying reasons of the third component on performance improvement of ternary OPVs, indicating ternary strategy should be an efficient method to optimize active layers for synchronously improving photon harvesting, exciton dissociation and charge transport, while keeping the simple cell fabrication technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ma X, Gao W, Yu J, An Q, Zhang M, Hu Z, Wang J, Tang W, Yang C, Zhang F. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 2134–2141
Hu Z, Wang J, Wang Z, Gao W, An Q, Zhang M, Ma X, Wang J, Miao J, Yang C, Zhang F. Nano Energy, 2019, 55: 424–432
Xie Y, Huo L, Fan B, Fu H, Cai Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Wang Y, Ma W, Chen Y, Sun Y. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1800627
Xiao Z, Yang S, Yang Z, Yang J, Yip HL, Zhang F, He F, Wang T, Wang J, Yuan Y, Yang H, Wang M, Ding L. Adv Mater, 2018, 270: 1804790
An Q, Zhang F, Gao W, Sun Q, Zhang M, Yang C, Zhang J. Nano Energy, 2018, 45: 177–183
Zhao J, Li Y, Yang G, Jiang K, Lin H, Ade H, Ma W, Yan H. Nat Energy, 2016, 1: 15027
Deng D, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu L, Fang J, Xia B, Wang Z, Lu K, Ma W, Wei Z. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13740
Kumari T, Lee SM, Kang SH, Chen S, Yang C. Energy Environ Sci, 2017, 10: 258–265
Gao HH, Sun Y, Wan X, Ke X, Feng H, Kan B, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li C, Chen Y. Adv Sci, 2018, 5: 1800307
Zhang M, Zhang F, An Q, Sun Q, Wang W, Zhang J, Tang W. Nano Energy, 2016, 22: 241–254
Cheng P, Li G, Zhan X, Yang Y. Nat Photon, 2018, 12: 131–142
Miao J, Zhang F. Laser Photon Rev, 2019, 13: 1800204
Gao J, Ming R, An Q, Ma X, Zhang M, Miao J, Wang J, Yang C, Zhang F. Nano Energy, 2019, 63: 103888
Fu H, Wang Z, Sun Y. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 4442–4453
Hu Z, Wang Z, An Q, Zhang F. Sci Bull, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.016
Ma X, Luo M, Gao W, Yuan J, An Q, Zhang M, Hu Z, Gao J, Wang J, Zou Y, Yang C, Zhang F. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 7843–7851
Yuan J, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Zhang G, Yip HL, Lau TK, Lu X, Zhu C, Peng H, Johnson PA, Leclerc M, Cao Y, Ulanski J, Li Y, Zou Y. Joule, 2019, 3: 1140–1151
Li K, Wu Y, Tang Y, Pan M-, Ma W, Fu H, Zhan C, Yao J. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 1901728
Chen S, Lee SM, Xu J, Lee J, Lee KC, Hou T, Yang Y, Jeong M, Lee B, Cho Y, Jung S, Oh J, Zhang ZG, Zhang C, Xiao M, Li Y, Yang C. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 2569–2580
Zhang M, Xiao Z, Gao W, Liu Q, Jin K, Wang W, Mi Y, An Q, Ma X, Liu X, Yang C, Ding L, Zhang F. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 1801968
An Q, Ma X, Gao J, Zhang F. Sci Bull, 2019, 64: 504–506
Ma Y, Zhou X, Cai D, Tu Q, Ma W, Zheng Q. Mater Horiz, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9MH00993K
Geng R, Song X, Feng H, Yu J, Zhang M, Gasparini N, Zhang Z, Liu F, Baran D, Tang W. ACS Energy Lett, 2019, 4: 763–770
Yu R, Yao H, Cui Y, Hong L, He C, Hou J. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1902302
Fu H, Li C, Bi P, Hao X, Liu F, Li Y, Wang Z, Sun Y. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1807006
Hedley G J, Ward A J, Alekseev A, Howells C T, Martins E R, Serrano L A, Cooke G, Ruseckas A, Samuel I D. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 2867
Zhang S, Qin Y, Zhu J, Hou J. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1800868
An M, Xie F, Geng X, Zhang J, Jiang J, Lei Z, He D, Xiao Z, Ding L. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 1602509
Zhang M, Gao W, Zhang F, Mi Y, Wang W, An Q, Wang J, Ma X, Miao J, Hu Z, Liu X, Zhang J, Yang C. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 841–849
Ma X, Xiao Z, An Q, Zhang M, Hu Z, Wang J, Ding L, Zhang F. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6: 21485–21492
Miao J, Zhang F. J Mater Chem C, 2019, 7: 1741–1791
Zhang M, Zhang F, An Q, Sun Q, Wang W, Ma X, Zhang J, Tang W. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 3589–3598
Hu Z, Zhang F, An Q, Zhang M, Ma X, Wang J, Zhang J, Wang J. ACS Energy Lett, 2018, 3: 555–561
Jhuo HJ, Liao SH, Li YL, Yeh PN, Chen SA, Wu WR, Su CJ, Lee JJ, Yamada NL, Jeng US. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 3094–3104
An Q, Wang J, Zhang F. Nano Energy, 2019, 60: 768–774
Xu C, Wang J, An Q, Ma X, Hu Z, Gao J, Zhang J, Zhang F. Nano Energy, 2019, 104119
Wang W, Zhang F, Du M, Li L, Zhang M, Wang K, Wang Y, Hu B, Fang Y, Huang J. Nano Lett, 2017, 17: 1995–2002
Zhang G, Zhang K, Yin Q, Jiang XF, Wang Z, Xin J, Ma W, Yan H, Huang F, Cao Y. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 2387–2395
Hu Z, Wang Z, Zhang F. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 7025–7032
Miao J, Du M, Fang Y, Zhang X, Zhang F. Sci China Chem, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-019-9582-7
Liu T, Luo Z, Chen Y, Yang T, Xiao Y, Zhang G, Ma R, Lu X, Zhan C, Zhang M, Yang C, Li Y, Yao J, Yan H. Energy Environ Sci, 2019, 12: 2529–2536
An Q, Gao W, Zhang F, Wang J, Zhang M, Wu K, Ma X, Hu Z, Jiao C, Yang C. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6: 2468–2475
Kan B, Feng H, Yao H, Chang M, Wan X, Li C, Hou J, Chen Y. Sci China Chem, 2018, 61: 1307–1313
Ma X, Mi Y, Zhang F, An Q, Zhang M, Hu Z, Liu X, Zhang J, Tang W. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 1702854
Bi P, Xiao T, Yang X, Niu M, Wen Z, Zhang K, Qin W, So SK, Lu G, Hao X, Liu H. Nano Energy, 2018, 46: 81–90
Li W, Yan Y, Gong Y, Cai J, Cai F, Gurney RS, Liu D, Pearson AJ, Lidzey DG, Wang T. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1704212
Fan Q, Su W, Wang Y, Guo B, Jiang Y, Guo X, Liu F, Russell TP, Zhang M, Li Y. Sci China Chem, 2018, 61: 531–537
Zhang T, Dement DB, Ferry VE, Holmes RJ. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 1156
Wu Y, Zheng Y, Yang H, Sun C, Dong Y, Cui C, Yan H, Li Y. Sci China Chem, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-019-9599-1
Fan B, Zhang D, Li M, Zhong W, Zeng Z, Ying L, Huang F, Cao Y. Sci China Chem, 2019, 62: 746–752
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61675017), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4192049). The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (beamline BL16B1) for GWAIXS and GISAXS measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, J., Wang, J., An, Q. et al. Over 16.7% efficiency of ternary organic photovoltaics by employing extra PC71BM as morphology regulator. Sci. China Chem. 63, 83–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-019-9634-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-019-9634-5