Skip to main content
Log in

A direct-variance-analysis method for generalized stochastic eigenvalue problem based on matrix perturbation theory

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been extensively recognized that the engineering structures are becoming increasingly precise and complex, which makes the requirements of design and analysis more and more rigorous. Therefore the uncertainty effects are indispensable during the process of product development. Besides, iterative calculations, which are usually unaffordable in calculative efforts, are unavoidable if we want to achieve the best design. Taking uncertainty effects into consideration, matrix perturbation methodpermits quick sensitivity analysis and structural dynamic re-analysis, it can also overcome the difficulties in computational costs. Owing to the situations above, matrix perturbation method has been investigated by researchers worldwide recently. However, in the existing matrix perturbation methods, correlation coefficient matrix of random structural parameters, which is barely achievable in engineering practice, has to be given or to be assumed during the computational process. This has become the bottleneck of application for matrix perturbation method. In this paper, we aim to develop an executable approach, which contributes to the application of matrix perturbation method. In the present research, the first-order perturbation of structural vibration eigenvalues and eigenvectors is derived on the basis of the matrix perturbation theory when structural parameters such as stiffness and mass have changed. Combining the first-order perturbation of structural vibration eigenvalues and eigenvectors with the probability theory, the variance of structural random eigenvalue is derived from the perturbation of stiffness matrix, the perturbation of mass matrix and the eigenvector of baseline-structure directly. Hence the Direct-Variance-Analysis (DVA) method is developed to assess the variation range of the structural random eigenvalues without correlation coefficient matrix being involved. The feasibility of the DVA method is verified with two numerical examples (one is truss-system and the other is wing structure of MA700 commercial aircraft), in which the DVA method also shows superiority in computational efficiency when compared to the Monte-Carlo method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Topping B H V, Neves L F, Barros R C. Trends in Civil and Structural Engineering Computing. Stirlingshire: Saxe-Coburg Publications, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barth T. A Brief Overview of Uncertainty Quantification and Error Estimation in Numerical Simulation. NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Report, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. David E S, Michael B, Obaid Y. Systems Engineering and Program Management Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons Programs. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation Publication, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrew S, Mike G. Trends in complex systems acquisition. Rusi Defense System, 2009, 2: 74–77

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zang T A. Needs and Opportunities for Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Methods for Aerospace Vehicles. NASA Report, TM-2002-211462, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  6. Measurement uncertainty analysis principle and methods. In: NASA Measurement Quality Assurance Handbook. Washington D.C.: NASA, 2010

  7. Roy C, Oberkampf W. A complete framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing. AIAA J, 2010, 2: 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ni Z, Qiu Z P. Interval design point method for calculating the reliability of structural systems. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2013, 56: 2151–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu Z P, Huang R, Wang X J, et al. Structural reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization: Recent advances. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2013, 56: 1611–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oberkampf W, Helton J C, Joslyn C A, et al. Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters. Reliabil Eng Syst Safety, 2004, 85: 11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elishakoff I, Wang X J, Hu J X, et al. Minimization of the least favorable static response of a two-span beam subject to uncertain loading. Thin-Wall Struct, 2013, 79: 49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu F Q, Yao W X. A model of the fatigue life distribution of composite laminates based on their static strength distribution. Chin J Aeron, 2008, 21: 241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gumbert C, Hou G, Newman P. Reliability assessment of a robust design under uncertainty for a 3-D flexible wing. AIAA-2003-4094

  14. Chen S H. Matrix Perturbation Theory in Structure Vibration Analysis. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing House, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu Z P, Chen S H, Elishakoff I. Natural frequencies of structures with uncertain but nonrandom parameters. J Optim Theory Appl, 1995, 86: 669–683

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang X W, Chen S H, Wu B S. Eigenvalue reanalysis of structures using perturbation and PADE approximation. Mech Syst Signal Proc, 2001, 15: 257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kleiber M, Hien T D. The Stochastic Finite Element Method: Basic Perturbation Technique and Computer Implementation. New York: Wiley, 1992

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham L, Deodatis G. Response and eigenvalue analysis of stochastic finite element systems with multiple correlated material and geometric properties. Probab Eng Mech, 2001, 16: 11–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pradlwarter H J, Schuëller G I, Székely G S. Random eigenvalue problems for large systems. Comp Struct, 2002, 80: 2415–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaminski M, Solecka M. Optimization of the truss-type structures using the generalized perturbation-based stochastic finite element method. Finite Elements Analysis Design, 2013, 63: 69–79

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Debraj G. Application of the random eigenvalue problem in forced response analysis of a linear stochastic structure. Archive Appl Mech, 2013, 4: 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. William S M. Anti-optimization of uncertain structures using interval analysis. Comput Struct, 2001, 79: 421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qiu Z P, Elishakoff I. Anti-optimization of structures with large uncertain-but-non-random parameters via interval analysis. Comput Methodsin Appl Mechanicsand Eng, 1998, 152: 361–372

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HeChen Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, Z., Qiu, H. A direct-variance-analysis method for generalized stochastic eigenvalue problem based on matrix perturbation theory. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 1238–1248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5563-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5563-8

Keywords

Navigation