Skip to main content
Log in

Runner cone optimization to reduce vortex rope-induced pressure fluctuations in a Francis turbine

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pressure fluctuations induced by a vortex rope are the major causes of hydraulic turbine vibration in partial load operating conditions. Hence, an effective control strategy should be adopted to improve rotating characteristics of the vortex rope and reduce the corresponding pressure fluctuation. In this study, two new types of runner cones (i.e., abnormally shaped and long straight cones) were proposed to optimize the pressure distribution in the draft tube, and unsteady numerical simulations were performed to determine their mechanism of action. Numerical results were validated using flow observation and pressure fluctuation experiments. Detailed analyses were conducted to understand the effects of the helical vortex rope operating conditions. The results indicated that pressure fluctuations in the draft tube at partial load operation result primarily from low frequency fluctuations induced by the rotation of the helical vortex rope, whose amplitudes are related to the rotating radius of the helical vortex rope. Both runner cone types could effectively reduce the pressure-fluctuation amplitude. The long straight type could reduce the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation induced by vortex rope to a maximum of 74.08% and the abnormal-shape type to 38.31%. Thus, the effective optimization of the runner cone can potentially reduce pressure-fluctuation amplitudes. Our research findings were applied to a real hydraulic plant in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou X, Shi C, Miyagawa K, et al. Investigation of pressure fluctuation and pulsating hydraulic axial thrust in Francis turbines. Energies, 2020, 13: 1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar S, Cervantes M J, Gandhi B K. Rotating vortex rope formation and mitigation in draft tube of hydro turbines—A review from experimental perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 136: 110354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laouari A, Ghenaiet A, Amano R S. Simulations of steady cavitating flow in a small Francis turbine. Int J Rotat Mach, 2016, 2016: 4851454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valentín D, Presas A, Egusquiza M. Behavior of Francis turbines at part load. field assessment in prototype: Effects on power swing. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2019, 240: 62012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sano T, Maekawa M, Okamoto N, et al. Investigation of flow pattern downstream of spiral grooved runner cone in pump-turbine. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2012, 15: 22019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gogstad P J, Dahlhaug O G. Evaluation of runner cone extension to dampen pressure fluctuations in a Francis model turbine. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2016, 49: 82019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zobeiri A. Investigations of time dependent flow phenomena in a turbine and a pump-turbine of Francis type: Rotor-stator interactions and precessing vortex rope. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosioc A I, Muntean S, Tanasa C, et al. Unsteady pressure measurements of decelerated swirling flow in a discharge cone at lower runner speeds. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2014, 22: 32008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skripkin S, Tsoy M, Kuibin P, et al. Swirling flow in a hydraulic turbine discharge cone at different speeds and discharge conditions. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci, 2019, 100: 349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang J, Hu Q J, Ding J H, et al. Effects of the vortex rope dynamic characteristics on the swirling flow in the draft tube cone. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2018, 163: 12003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal R, Cervantes M J, Gandhi B K. Synchronized PIV and pressure measurements on a model Francis turbine during start-up. J Hydraulic Res, 2020, 58: 70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pasche S, Gallaire F, Avellan F. Origin of the synchronous pressure fluctuations in the draft tube of Francis turbines operating at part load conditions. J Fluids Struct, 2019, 86: 13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ni Y, Zhu R, Zhang X, et al. Numerical investigation on radial impeller induced vortex rope in draft tube under partial load conditions. J Mech Sci Technol, 2018, 32: 157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudolf P, Stefan D. Decomposition of the swirling flow field downstream of Francis turbine runner. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2012, 15: 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tamura Y, Tani K, Okamoto N. Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady behavior of cavitating vortices in draft tube of low specific speed Francis turbine. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2014, 22: 32011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng H, Zhou L, Liang Q, et al. A method of evaluating the vortex rope strength in draft tube of Francis turbine. Renew Energy, 2020, 152: 770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sotoudeh N, Maddahian R, Cervantes M J. Investigation of rotating vortex rope formation during load variation in a Francis turbine draft tube. Renew Energy, 2020, 151: 238–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Zhou L, Wang Z. Numerical investigation of the cavitation dynamic parameters in a Francis turbine draft tube with columnar vortex rope. J Hydrodyn, 2019, 31: 931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulu B G, Jonsson P P, Cervantes M J. Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube—Part I: Best efficiency point. Appl Energy, 2012, 93: 695–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Litvinov I, Shtork S, Gorelikov E, et al. Unsteady regimes and pressure pulsations in draft tube of a model hydro turbine in a range of off-design conditions. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci, 2018, 91: 410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baya A, Muntean S, Câmpian V, et al. Experimental investigations of the unsteady flow in a Francis turbine draft tube cone. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2010, 12: 12007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Favrel A, Müller A, Landry C, et al. Study of the vortex-induced pressure excitation source in a Francis turbine draft tube by particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids, 2015, 56: 215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Antunes Jr G J, Lima A K F, Vaz J R P, et al. Computational analysis of vortex rope in a hydroturbine of Tucuruí dam. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2020, 42: 313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arpe J, Nicolet C, Avellan F. Experimental evidence of hydroacoustic pressure waves in a Francis turbine elbow draft tube for low discharge conditions. J Fluids Eng, 2009, 131: 81102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson H. Simulations of the vortex in the Dellenback abrupt expansion, resembling a hydro turbine draft tube operating at part-load. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2012, 15: 22016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hočevar M, Širok B, Blagojevič B. Prediction of cavitation vortex dynamics in the draft tube of a francis turbine using radial basis neural networks. Neural Comput Appl, 2005, 14: 229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirschner O, Schmidt H, Ruprecht A, et al. Experimental investigation of vortex control with an axial jet in the draft tube of a model pumpturbine. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2010, 12: 12092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. KC A, Lee Y H, Thapa B. CFD study on prediction of vortex shedding in draft tube of Francis turbine and vortex control techniques. Renew Energy, 2016, 86: 1406–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Z, Baek S H, Cho H, et al. Optimal design of J-groove shape on the suppression of unsteady flow in the Francis turbine draft tube. J Mech Sci Technol, 2019, 33: 2211–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohammadi M, Hajidavalloo E, Behbahani-Nejad M. Investigation on combined air and water injection in Francis turbine draft tube to reduce vortex rope effects. J Fluids Eng, 2019, 141

  31. Li R F, Zhao Y. Study on the influence of cone with holes on vortex zone of vortex rope of Francis turbine (in Chinese). Large Electric Machine Hydraulic Turbine, 2020, 2: 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao D L, Gao C F et al. Effect of runner cone length and shaft center hole water feeding on flow characteristics in draft tube (in Chinese). J Drainage Irrigation Mach Eng, 2019, 5: 413–419, 434

    Google Scholar 

  33. Binama M, Su W T, Cai W H, et al. Investigation on reversible pump turbine flow structures and associated pressure field characteristics under different guide vane openings. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 2052–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang C Y, Wang F J, An D S, et al. A general alternate loading technique and its applications in the inverse designs of centrifugal and mixed-flow pump impellers. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 64: 898–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fu X, Zuo Z, Chang H, et al. Mechanism of low frequency high amplitude pressure fluctuation in a pump-turbine during the load rejection process. J Hydraulic Res, 2021, 59: 280–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HongJie Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51806044), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Projection (Grant No. 2018M630353), and the Industrial Prospect and Key Core Technology of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2019009-1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Yu, L., Yan, X. et al. Runner cone optimization to reduce vortex rope-induced pressure fluctuations in a Francis turbine. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 1953–1970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1867-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1867-2

Navigation