Skip to main content
Log in

Small is beautiful, and dry

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thousands of plant and animal species have been observed to have superhydrophobic surfaces that lead to various novel behaviors. These observations have inspired attempts to create artificial superhydrophobic surfaces, given that such surfaces have multitudinous applications. Superhydrophobicity is an enhanced effect of surface roughness and there are known relationships that correlate surface roughness and superhydrophobicity, based on the underlying physics. However, while these examples demonstrate the level of roughness they tell us little about the independence of this effect in terms of its scale. Thus, they are not capable of explaining why such naturally occurring surfaces commonly have micron-submicron sizes. Here we report on the discovery of a new relation, its physical basis and its experimental verification. The results reveal that scaling-down roughness into the micro-submicron range is a unique and elegant strategy to not only achieve superhydrophobicity but also to increase its stability against environmental disturbances. This new relation takes into account the previously overlooked but key fact that the accumulated line energy arising from the numerous solid-water-air intersections that can be distributed over the apparent contact area, when air packets are trapped at small scales on the surface, can dramatically increase as the roughness scale shrinks. This term can in fact become the dominant contributor to the surface energy and so becomes crucial for accomplishing superhydrophobicity. These findings guide fabrication of stable super water-repellant surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem, 1936, 28: 988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc, 1944, 40: 546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lafuma A, Quéré D. Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater, 2003, 2: 457–460

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng Q S, Yu Y, Zhao Z H. Effects of hydraulic pressure on the stability and transition of wetting modes of superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2005, 21: 12207–12212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu Y, Zhao Z H, Zheng Q S. Mechanical and superhydrophobic stabilities of two-scale surfacial structure of lotus leaves. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 8212–8216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lobaton E J, Salamon T R. Computation of constant mean curvature surfaces: Application to the gas-liquid interface of a pressurized fluid on a superhydrophobic surface. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2007, 314: 184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bush J W M, Hu D L, Prakash M. The integument of water-walking arthropods: Form and function. Adv Insect Physiol, 2008, 34: 117–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blossey R. Self-cleaning surfaces-Virtual realities. Nat Mater, 2003, 2: 301–306

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shafrin E G, Zisman W A. In Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion. Advances in Chemistry series. In: Fowkes F M, ed. Washington D C: American Chemical Society, 1964. 43: 145–167

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bico J, Marzolin C, Quéré D. Pearl drops. Europhys Lett, 1999, 47: 220–226

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Youngblood J P, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic polymer surfaces prepared by simultaneous ablation of polypropylene and sputtering of poly (tetrafluoroethylene) using radio frequency plasma. Macromolecules, 1999, 32: 6800–6806

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Öner D, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir, 2000, 16: 7777–7782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, et al. Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir, 1996: 12, 2125–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amirfazli A, Neumann A W. Status of the three-phase line tension. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2004, 110: 121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christenson H K, Claesson P M. Cavitation and the interaction between macroscopic hydrophobic surfaces. Science, 1988, 239: 390–392

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carambassis A, Jonker L C, Attard P, et al. Force measured between hydrophobic surfaces due to a submicroscopic bridging bubble. Phys Rev Lett, 1998, 80: 5357–5360

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh S, Houston J, Swol F, et al. Drying transition of confined water. Nature, 2006, 442: 526

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen N M. The Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera, Gerromorphs): Phylogeny, Adaptations, Biogeography and Classification. Klampenborg, Denmark: Scandinavian Science Press Ltd., 1982

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gao X F, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water strider. Nature, 2004, 432: 36

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu D L, Bush J W M. Meniscus-climbing inserts. Nature, 2005, 437: 733–736

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung Y C, Bhushan B. Dynamic effects of bouncing water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 6262–6269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Richard D, Clanet C, Quéré D. Contact time of a bouncing drop. Nature, 2002, 417: 811

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Drelich J, Miller D J. Modification of the Cassie equation. Langmuir, 1993, 9: 619–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta, 1997, 202: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parker A R, Lawrence C R. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 2001, 414: 33–34

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, et al. Designing superhydrophobic surfaces. Science, 2007, 318: 1618–1622

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Erbil H Y, Demirel A L, Avci Y, et al. Transformation of a simple plastic into a superhydrophobic surface. Science, 2003, 299: 1377–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nealey P F, Black A J, Wilbur J L, Whitesides G M. Molecular electronics. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aussillous P, Quéré D. Liquid marbles. Nature, 2001, 411: 924–927

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lahann J, Mitragotri S, Tran T-N, et al. A reversibly switching surface. Science, 2003, 299: 371–374

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Courbin L, Denieul E, Dressaire E, et al. Imbibition by polygonal spreading on microdecorated surfaces. Nat Mater, 2007, 6: 661–664

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanchez C, Arribart H, Guille M M G. Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 277–288

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to QuanShui Zheng.

Additional information

Recommended by HONG YouShi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, Q., Lv, C., Hao, P. et al. Small is beautiful, and dry. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 2245–2259 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-4172-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-4172-1

Keywords

Navigation