Skip to main content
Log in

High precision landing site mapping and rover localization for Chang’e-3 mission

  • Article
  • Sun and Solar System
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the comprehensive results of landing site topographic mapping and rover localization in Chang’e-3 mission. High-precision topographic products of the landing site with extremely high resolutions (up to 0.05 m) were generated from descent images and registered to CE-2 DOM. Local DEM and DOM with 0.02 m resolution were produced routinely at each waypoint along the rover traverse. The lander location was determined to be (19.51256°W, 44.11884°N, −2615.451 m) using a method of DOM matching. In order to reduce error accumulation caused by wheel slippage and IMU drift in dead reckoning, cross-site visual localization and DOM matching localization methods were developed to localize the rover at waypoints; the overall traveled distance from the lander is 114.8 m from cross-site visual localization and 111.2 m from DOM matching localization. The latter is of highest accuracy and has been verified using a LRO NAC image where the rover trajeactory is directly identifiable. During CE-3 mission operations, landing site mapping and rover localization products including DEMs and DOMs, traverse maps, vertical traverse profiles were generated timely to support teleoperation tasks such as obstacle avoidance and rover path planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ouyang Z. The primary science result from the Chang’E-1 probe. Sci China-Earth Sci, 2010, 53(11): 1565–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao L. China’s touch on the Moon. Nat Geosci, 2014, 7(6): 391–392

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li R, Squyres S W, Arvidson R E, et al. Initial results of rover localization and topographic mapping for the 2003 mars exploration rover mission. Photogramm Eng Rem S, 2005, 71(10): 1129–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arvidson R, Anderson R, Bartlett P, et al. Localization and physical properties experiments conducted by Spirit at Gusev Crater. Science, 2004, 305(5685): 821–824

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zakrajsek J, Mckissock D, Woytach J, et al. Exploration rover concepts and development challenges. In: 1st Space Exploration Conference: Continuing the Voyage of Discovery. Orlando: AIAA, 2005. 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golombek M, Cook R, Economou T, et al. Overview of the Mars Pathfinder mission and assessment of landing site predictions. Science, 1997, 278(5344): 1743–1748

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Golombek M, Anderson R, Barnes J, et al. Overview of the Mars Pathfinder mission: Launch through landing, surface operations, data sets, and science results. J Geophys Res Planets, 1999, 104(E4): 8523–8553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li R, Di K, Matthies L H, et al. Rover localization and landing-site mapping technology for the 2003 Mars Exploration Rover mission. Photogramm Eng Rem S, 2004, 70(1): 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker T, Malin M, Golombek M, et al. Localization, localization, localization. In: 35th Lunar and Planet science conference, abstract, Woodlands, 2004. 2189

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng Y, Maimone M W, Matthies L. Visual odometry on the Mars exploration rovers-a tool to ensure accurate driving and science imaging. IEEE Robotics Automation Mag, 2006, 13(2): 54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maimone M, Cheng Y, Matthies L. Two years of visual odometry on the mars exploration rovers. J Field Robot, 2007, 24(3): 169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Di K. A review of spirit and opportunity rover localization methods (in Chinese). Spacecraft Eng, 2009, 18(5): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Di K, Xu F, Wang J, et al. Photogrammetric processing of rover imagery of the 2003 Mars Exploration Rover mission. Isprs J Photogramm, 2008, 63(2): 181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J, Huang J, Qiao L, et al. Geologic characteristics of the Chang’E-3 exploration region. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2014, 57: 569–576

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jia Y, Liu S, Li M, et al. Chang’E-3 system pinpoint landing localization based on descent image sequence (in Chinese). Chin Sci Bull, 2014, 59(19): 1838–1843

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wan W, Liu Z, Di K, et al. A cross-site visual localization method for Yutu rover. In: ISPRS 2014 Technical Commission IV Symposium. Suzhou, 2014. 279–284

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Ren X, Mou L, et al. Payloads and scientific experiments of Chang’E-2 lunar Orbiter (in Chinese). Life Sci Instruments, 2013, 11(2): 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ouyang Z C. Chang’E-2 preliminary results (in Chinese). Chin J Nat, 2013, 35(6): 391–395

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao B, Li C, Huang J, et al. Analysis on in-orbit CCD stereo camera images of Chang’e-2 lunar satellite (in Chinese). Spacecraft Eng, 2012, 21(5): 1–7

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. ASU. Chang’e 3 Lander and Rover From Above (J/OL). Secondary Chang’e 3 Lander and Rover From Above (J/OL), 2014, 2014(Agust 28): http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/viewlroc/LRO-L-LROC-2-EDR-V1.0/M1147290066RE

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Z, Wan W, Peng M, et al. Remote sensing mapping and localization techniques for teleoperation of Chang’e-3 Rover (in Chinese). J Remote Sensing, 2014, 18(5): 971–980

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lowe D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fischler M, Bolles R. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM, 1981, 24(6): 381–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Peng M, Di K, Liu Z. Adaptive markov random field model for dense matching of deep space stereo images. J Remote Sensing, 2014, 18(1): 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peng M, Yue Z, Liu Y, et al. Lunar and Mars orbital stereo image mapping. In: Proc SPIE. Hangzhou: SPIE, 2010. 820304

    Google Scholar 

  26. Di K, Liu Z, Yue Z. Mars rover localization based on feature matching between ground and orbital imagery. Photogramm Eng Rem S, 2011, 77(8): 781–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morel J, Yu G. ASIFT: A new framework for fully affine invariant image comparison. SIAM J Imaging Sci, 2009, 2(2): 438–469

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan W. Theory and Methods of Stereo Vision Based Autonomous Rover Localization in Deep Space Exploration (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to KaiChang Di.

Additional information

Recommended by XIAO Long (Assoicate Editor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Di, K., Peng, M. et al. High precision landing site mapping and rover localization for Chang’e-3 mission. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 58, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5612-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5612-0

Keyowrds

Navigation