Abstract
In the past decade, mechanical, physical, and chemical characterization of reservoir shale rocks, such as the Woodford shale, which is kerogen-rich shale (KRS), has moved toward micro- and nanoscale testing and analyses. Nanoindentation equipment is now widely used in many industrial and university laboratories to measure shale anisotropic Young’s moduli, kerogen stiffness, plastic yield parameters, and other isotropic and anisotropic poromechanical and viscoelastic properties. However, to date, failure analyses of KRS and the effects of organic components on the tensile strength have not been observed or measured at the micro- or nanoscales. In this study, preserved kerogen-rich Woodford shale samples manufactured in micro-beam and micro-pillar geometries were mechanically tested and brought to failure in tension and compression, respectively. These tests were conducted in situ using a nanoindenter inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The load versus displacement curves of prismatic micro-cantilever beams were analyzed in light of high-resolution images collected during tensile fracture initiation, propagation, and ultimately sample failure. The micro-pillar geometries were subjected to a uniaxial compressive load and were also brought to failure while capturing measurements of stress and strain. It was found that, within just a few hundred microns of the KRS micro-cantilever beams, both brittle and ductile failure modes were observed. In the ductile plastic domain, strain-softening and strain-hardening behaviors were identified and characterized. These were not due to confining stress variations, but due to the volume of the organic matter and the way it is interlaced with the shale minerals in and around the failure planes. The tensile strength characteristics and the large modulus of toughness of kerogen, which is a cross-linked polymer, definitely weigh heavily in our engineering field applications, such as hydraulic fracking, which is a Mode I tensile fracture opening and propagation phenomenon. This practice demands that, due to the complex composite nature of KRS, mechanical characterization be not only for unconfined compressive strength but also for unconfined tensile strength and moduli of ruptures. At the end of this study, the need for nanometer scale mechanical characterization of KRS will become apparent. These nano- and micro-scale shale failure tests reinforce our previous understanding of the heterogeneous composite nature of Woodford KRS and its complex behavior, as well as other source shale reservoir formations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abad MD, Parker S, Frazer D, Robelo de Figueiredo M, Lupinacci A, Kikuchi K, Hosemann P (2015) Evaluation of the material properties of the multilayered oxides formed on HCM12A using small scale mechanical testing. Oxid Met 84:211–231. doi:10.1007/s11085-015-9551-6
Abousleiman Y, Cui L (1998) Poroelastic solutions in transversely isotropic media for wellbore and cylinders. Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4905–4930
Abousleiman Y, Ulm F-J (2003) “TheGeoGenome™ Industry Consortium”. JIP internal report, The Poromechanics Institute, Oklahoma University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abousleiman Y, Cheng AH-D, Jiang C, Roegiers J-C (1993) A micromechanically consistent poroviscoelasticity theory for rock mechanics applications. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(7):1177–1180
Abousleiman Y, Cheng AH-D, Cui L, Detournay E, Roegiers J-C (1996) Mandel’s problem revisited: consolidation of a porous anisotropic rock. Geotechnique 46(2):187–195
Abousleiman Y, Cheng AH-D, Jiang C, Roegiers JC (1996) Poroviscoelastic analyses of borehole and cylinder problems. Acta Mech 119:199–219
Abousleiman Y, Tran M, Hoang S, Bobko C, Ortega JA, Ulm F-J (2007) Geomechanics field and lab characterization of woodford shale: the next gas play. In: SPE annual technical conference, society of petroleum engineers, Anaheim, CA, 11–14 November
Abousleiman Y, Tran M, Hoang S, Ortega JA, Ulm F-J (2009) GeoMechanics field characterization of the two prolific U.S. mid-west gas plays with advanced wire-line logging tools. In: SPE annual technical conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4–7 October
Abousleiman Y, Hoang S, Tran M (2010) Mechanical characterization of small shale samples subjected to fluid exposure using the inclined direct shear testing device. Int J Rock Mech Min 47(3):355–367
Abousleiman Y, Tran M, Hoang S, Ulm F-J, Ortega JA, Bobko C (2013) Method of predicting mechanical properties of rocks using mineral compositions provided by in-situ logging tools. U.S. Patent: 8,380,437
Abousleiman Y, Hoang S, Liu C (2014) Anisotropic porothermoelastic solution and hydro-thermal effects on fracture width in hydraulic fracturing. Int J Numer Anal Met 38(5):493–517
Allan M, Kanitpanyacharoen W, Vanorio T (2015) A multiscale methodology for the analysis of velocity anisotropy in organic-rich shale. Geophysics 80(4):C73–C88
Ananthan H, Raghuprasad BK, Iyengar KTSR (1990) Influence of strain softening on the fracture of plain concrete beams. Int J Fract 45:195–219
Ballice L (2003) Solvent swelling studies of Goynuk (kerogen type-I) and Beypazari oil shales (kerogen type-II). Fuel 82(11):1317–1321
Bazant ZP, Oh BH (1984) Deformation of progressively cracking reinforced concrete Beams. ACI J 81(3):268–278
Bazant ZP, Zubelewicz A (1988) Strain-softening bar and beam: exact non-local solution. Int J Solids Struct 24(7):659–673
Bennett KC, Berla LA, Nix WD, Borja RI (2015) Instrumented nanoindentation and 3D mechanistic modeling of a shale at multiple scales. Acta Geotech 10:1–14
Bhandari A, Han J, Parsons RL (2015) Two-dimensional DEM analysis of behavior of geogrid-reinforced uniform granular bases under a vertical cyclic load. Acta Geotech 10(4):469–480
Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164
Bobko CP, Gathier B, Ortega JA, Ulm F-J, Borges L, Abousleiman Y (2010) The nanogranular origin of friction and cohesion in shale—a strength homogenization approach to interpretation of nanoindentation results. Int J Numer Anal Met 35(17):1854–1876
Boskey AL, Wright TM, Blank RD (1999) Collagen and bone strength. J Bone Min Res 14(3):330–335
Chen SH, Feng B (2011) Size effect in micro-scale cantilever beam bending. Acta Mech 219(3):291–307
Chern JC, You CM, Bazant ZP (1992) Deformation of progressively cracking partially prestressed concrete beams. PCI J 37(1):74–84
Chupin O, Rechenmacher AL, Abedi S (2012) Finite strain analysis of nonuniform deformation inside shear bands in sands. Int J Num Anal Met 36(14):1651–1666
Deirieh A, Ortega JA, Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2012) Nanochemomechanical assessment of shale: a coupled WDS-indentation analysis. Acta Geotech 7(4):271–295
Ekbote S, Abousleiman Y (2006) Porochemoelastic solution for an inclined borehole in a transversely isotropic formation. J Eng Mech-ASCE 132(7):754–763
Ertas D, Kelemen SR, Halsey TC (2006) Petroleum expulsion part 1. Theory of kerogen swelling in multicomponent solvents. Energy Fuels 20(1):295–300
Ewy RT (2014) Shale swelling/shrinkage and water content change due to imposed suction and due to direct brine contact. Acta Geotech 9(5):869–886
Frazer D, Abad MD, Krumwiede D, Back CA, Khalifa HE, Deck CP, Hosemann P (2015) Localized mechanical property assessment of SiC/SiC composite materials. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 70:93–101
Gao H, Ji B, Jager IL, Arst E, Fratzl P (2003) Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 100(10):5597–5600
Garnero P (2012) The contribution of collagen crosslinks to bone strength. Bonekey Rep 1(182):1–8
Han Y, Cundall PA (2013) LBM–DEM modeling of fluid–solid interaction in porous media. Int J Numer Anal Met 37(10):1391–1407
Hoang SK, Abousleiman Y (2012) Correspondence principle between anisotropic poroviscoelasticity and poroelasticity using micromechanics and application to compression of orthotropic rectangular strips. J Appl Phys 112(4):44907-1–44907-15
Hornby BE, Schwartz LM, Hudson JA (1994) Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics 59(10):1570–1583
Hosemann P, Swadener JG, Kiener D, Was GS, Maloy SA, Li N (2008) An exploratory study to determine applicability of nano-hardness and micro-compression measurements for yield stress estimation. J Nucl Mater 375(1):135–143
Hosemann P, Martos JN, Frazer D, Vasudevamurthy G, Byun TS, Hunn JD, Jolly BC, Terrani K, Okuniewski M (2013) Mechanical characteristics of SiC coating layer in TRISO fuel particles. J Nucl Mater 442(1–3):133–142
Iyengar KTRS, Raviraj S, Jayaram TN (2002) Analysis of crack propagation in strain-softening beams. Eng Fract Mech 69(6):761–778
Kelemen SR, Walters CC, Ertas D, Kwiatek LM, Curry DJ (2006) Petroleum expulsion part 2. Organic matter type and maturity effects on kerogen swelling by solvents and thermodynamic parameters for kerogen from regular solution theory. Energy Fuels 20(1):301–308
Kolymbas D (2009) Kinematics of shear bands. Acta Geotech 4(4):315–318
Lam D, Yang F, Chong A, Wang J, Tong P (2003) Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 51(8):1477–1508
Larsen JW, Parikh H, Michels R (2002) Changes in the cross-link density of Paris Basin Toarcian kerogen during maturation. Org Geochem 33(10):1143–1152
Li X, Bhushan B, Takashima K, Baek C-W, Kim Y-K (2003) Mechanical characterization of micro-nanoscale structures for MEMS/NEMS applications using nanoindentation techniques. Ultramicroscopy 97(1–4):481–494
Maio DD, Roberts SG (2005) Measuring fracture toughness of coatings using focused-ion-beam-machined microbeams. J Mater Res 20(2):299–302
Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583
Ortega JA, Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2007) The effect of the nanogranular nature of shale on their poroelastic behavior. Acta Geotech 2(3):155–182
Ortega A, Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2009) The nanogranular acoustic signature of shale. Geophysics 74(3):65–84
Ortega JA, Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2010) The effect of particle shape and grain-scale properties of shale: a micromechanics approach. Int J Numer Anal Met 34(11):1124–1156
Passey QR, Bohacs KM, Esch WL, Klimentidis R, Sinha S (2010) From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir—geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs. In: CPS/SPE international oil and gas conference and exhibition in China, Beijing, 8–10 June
Podio AL, Gregory AR, Gray KE (1968) Dynamic properties of dry- and water-saturated green river shale under stress. SPEJ 8(4):389–404
Richard P, Nicodemi M, Delannay R, Ribière P, Bideau D (2005) Slow relaxation and compaction of granular systems. Nat Mater 4:121–128
Shin C, Lim S, Jin H, Hosemann P, Kwon J (2014) Development and testing of microcompression for post irradiation characterization of ODS steels. J Nucl Mater 444(1–3):43–48
Sierra R, Tran MH, Abousleiman YN, Slatt RM (2011) Woodford shale mechanical properties and the impacts of lithofacies. In: 44th U.S. rock mechanics symposium and 5th U.S. Canada rock mechanics symposium, Salt Lake City, Utah, 27–30 June
Slatt R, Abousleiman Y (2011) Merging sequence stratigraphy and geomechanics for unconventional gas shales. Lead Edge 30(3):274–282
Slatt RM, Buckner N, Abousleiman Y, Sierra R, Philp PR, Miceli-Romero A, Portas R, O’Brien N, Tran M, Davis R, Wawrzyniec T (2012) Outcrop-behind Outcrop (Quarry): multiscale characterization of the Woodford gas shale, Oklahoma. In J. Breyer (ed) Shale reservoirs—giant resources for the 21st century: AAPG Memoir, vol 97, pp 382–402
Sone H, Zoback MD (2013) Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir rocks—part 1: static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy. Geophysics 78(5):D381–D392
Timoshenko S, Gere JM (1972) Mechanics of materials. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York 207
Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2006) The nano granular nature of shale. Acta Geotech 1(2):77–88
Ulm F-J, Constantinides G, Delafargue A, Abousleiman Y, Ewy R, Duranti L, McCarty DK (2005) Material invariant poromechanics properties of shales. In: Ulm F-J, Abousleiman F-Y, Cheng AH-D (eds) Poromechanics III. Biot centennial (1905–2005). A.A. Balkema Publishers, London, pp 637–644
Vernik L, Nur A (1992) Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks. Geophysics 57(5):727–735
Wenk H-R, Lonardelli I, Franz H, Nihei K, Nakagawa S (2007) Preferred orientation and elastic anisotropy of illite-rich shale. Geophysics 72(2):E69–E75
Zeszotarski JC, Chromik RR, Vinci RP, Messmer MC, Michels R, Larsen JW (2004) Imaging and mechanical property measurements of kerogen via nanoindentation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68(20):4113–4119
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Aramco for allowing the publication of this work. The technical work has benefited from discussions with the following colleagues at Aramco R&D Houston Center: Dan Georgi, Jordan Kone, David Jacobi, Hui-Hai Liu, Jinhong Chen, and Anuj Gupta. The first author would like to specially acknowledge the Geomechanics Gas Shale Consortium at the PoroMechanics Institute, University of Oklahoma, for providing the preserved Woodford shale tested in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
In Fig. 24, the micro-beam cantilever test, T1, is herein detailed for the load–displacement curve. The linear elastic early performance followed by the various slopes in the strain-softening regimes extended the micro-cantilever beam rupture to a very large displacement compared to the 600 nm for the early pure linear elastic deformation. From real-time in the SEM visualization, the dashed line represents the first major fracture observed at the fixed support at a load of 809 μN. In other words, the kerogen after that point was supporting most of the load, thus preventing the beam from reaching its rupture strength. The rebound slope at the bottom after stage 3 shows a linear elastic rebound in the figure. This is the proof that the kerogen cross-linked elastomer nature did not reach its rupture strength, but rather that mass of kerogen extended the initial shale granular deformation and failure by almost 10 times to 4500 nm and still reserving an elastic rebound. Not to overload the paper, micro-beam in Test 2, T2, in strain-hardening (KRS micro-beam) could also be easily explained in a similar way in the loading–unloading and when brought eventually to failure.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abousleiman, Y.N., Hull, K.L., Han, Y. et al. The granular and polymer composite nature of kerogen-rich shale. Acta Geotech. 11, 573–594 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0435-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0435-y