Skip to main content
Log in

The Social Network Analysis of Techno-Economic Systems: Comparing Results Based on Binary and Weighted Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The network analysis of a technological system combines the interindustry transactions with a matrix of sectoral innovative efforts as measured by R&D investment intensity. The matrixes of interindustry transactions of R&D-embodied products (innovations) are weighted matrixes where the interindustry flows measure the intensity of the innovation diffusion. In the past, studies using this approach in innovation studies have transformed weighted matrixes into binary matrixes of zero and one element where the flows less than a selected threshold value were considered to be zero and the flows greater than the threshold value were counted as one. Such matrix transformation leads to the loss of a great deal of information. In the present study, using degree and clustering coefficients for both binary direct as well as weighted direct techno-economic networks of the manufacturing sector of the German economy, we show that the binary directed network analysis is incapable of refined ranking of interindustry innovation transactions. The total degree index based on the weighted network of the German techno-economic system assigns a unique ranking to each sector, and clustering coefficients show that at least 75% of sectors in the network of Germany have two links with the other industries. However, the same indices based on the binary network are incapable of such refined ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti S V, Latora Y, Moreno M, Chavez D U (2006). Hwang complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports 424:175–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination:132–165.Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, R Stankiewics (1991). On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Evolutionary Economics 1:93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagiolo G (2007). Clustering in complex directed networks. Physical Review E 76:026107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia A, Morillas A, Ramos C (2010). Spanish and European innovation diffusion: A structural hole approach in the input-output filed. Annal of Regional Science 44:147–165, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0247-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzichronoglou T (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/134337307632.

  • Leoncini R M, Maggioni, S Montresor (1996). Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: Network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany Research Policy 25:415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leoncini R, S Montresor (2000). Network analysis of eight technological systems. International Review of Applied Economics 14:213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W (1986). Input-Output Economics (2ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montresor S, G V Marzetti (2008). Innovation clusters in technological systems: A network analysis of 15 OECD countries for the mid-1990s. Industry and Innovation 15:321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montresor S, G V Marzetti (2009). Applying social network analysis to input-output based innovation matrices: An illustrative application to six OECD technological systems for the middle 19990s. Economic Systems Research 21:129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1992). Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94:1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saramaki J, M Kievela, J Onnela, K Kaski, J Kertesz (2007). Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex netwroks. Physical Review E 75:027105–1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semitiel-Garcia M (2006). Social Capital, Networks and Economic Development. An Analysis of Regional Productive Systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semitiel-Garcia M, P Noguera-Mendez (2012). The structure of inter-industry systems and the diffusion of innovations: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer F M (1982). Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64:627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soofi A, Saadat Moussavi (2004). Transmissions of real economic shocks across the Pacific Rim economies. Journal of Policy Modeling 26:9559972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soofi A, S Ghazinoory (2011). The network of the Iranian techno-economic system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78:591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSIIF (2003). Technological Systems and Intersectoral Innovation Flows Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen B (1995). Measuring Inter-Sectoral Technology Spillovers: Estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases. Merit Research Memorandum 2/95-007, Maastricht.

  • Wasserman S, K Faust (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdol S. Soofi.

Additional information

Abdol S. Soofi is professor of economics, School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He received his PhD degree from the Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside. In addition to publishing over fifty articles in leading academic journals, Soofi has co-edited three books: The Development of Science and Technology in Iran: Policies and Learning Frameworks, Palgrave-Macmillan, 2017; Science and Innovation in Iran: Development, Progress, and Challenges, Palgrave-Macmillan in 2013, and Modeling and Forecasting Financial Data: Techniques of Nonlinear Dynamics, Kluwer Publishers, 2002. Soofi has co-authored Global Merger Mergers and Acquisitions: Combining Companies across Borders that was published by Business Expert Press in 2014, and the 2nd expanded edition of the book was published in 2018. Soofi is currently serving as the Guest Editor of a special issue of Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management on the national systems of innovation of Iran.

Abdi Mansoureh received PhD in science & technology policy from the Department of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. She received her BSc in industrial engineering from Bu Ali Sina University and her MSc in industrial engineering from Tarbiat Modares University. Her thesis is about policy extracting to promote NIS in Iran by theory of constraints.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soofi, A.S., Abdi, M. The Social Network Analysis of Techno-Economic Systems: Comparing Results Based on Binary and Weighted Networks. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 29, 68–84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-019-5432-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-019-5432-x

Keywords

Navigation