Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Descriptive and explanatory markedness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wide empirical coverage of two number features, [±singular] and [±augmented], is used to show that (Greenbergian) category-internal markedness, (geometric) feature markedness, and value markedness are, respectively, epiphenomenal, untenable, and too simplistically formulated to be currently evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anceaux J.C. (1965) The Nimboran language: Phonology and morphology. ’s-Gravenhage, M. Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver D. (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Béjar, S. (2003). Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.

  • Benveniste E. (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Calabrese, A. (1988). Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Chomsky N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchward C.M. (1953) Tongan grammar. Vava’u Press, Tonga

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R. (1983) Quantification and syntactic theory. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G. (2000) Number. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, M. (1992). Sanskrit: An introduction to the classical language (2nd ed.). London: Hodder and Stoughton (revised by Richard Gombrich and James Benson).

  • Crowley, T. (1982). The Paamese language of Vanuatu, volume B 87 of Pacific linguistics. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

  • Cysouw M. (2003) The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley W. (1991) The Yimas language of New Guinea. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton J. (2002) Syncretism, impoverishment, and the structure of person features. In: Andronis M., Debenport E., Pycha A., Yoshimori K. (eds) Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society (Vol. 38). Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J.H. (1966) Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale K. (1973) Person marking in Walbiri. In: Anderson S.R., Kiparsky P. (eds) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 308–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbour, D. (2005). Valence and atomic number. Ms., Queen Mary, University of London (under review).

  • Harbour, D. (2006a). Number: The morphological use of semantic atoms. Queen Mary’s OPAL #5. http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/dharbour/Queen-Mary’s-OPALs.html.

  • Harbour, D. (2006b). On the unity of ‘number’ in morphology and semantics. In R. Otoguro, G. Popova, & A. Spencer, (Eds.), Essex research reports in linguistics (Proceedings of the York–Essex morphology meeting 2) (Vol. 47, pp. 21–30). University of Essex: Department of Language and Linguistics.

  • Harbour, D. (2006c). Person hierarchies and geometries without hierarchies or geometries. Presentation at Leipzig morphology colloquium. Queen Mary’s OPAL #6. http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/dharbour/Queen-Mary’s-OPALs.html.

  • Harbour D. (2007) Morphosemantic number: From Kiowa noun classes to UG number features. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbour, D. (2009). Mass, non-singularity, and augmentation. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman, & D. Hill, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MIT (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 57, pp. 349–360). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Harley, H. (1994). Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. In A. Carnie, H. Harley, & T. Bures, (Eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on phonology and morphology (pp. 289–320). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Harley H., Ritter E. (2002) Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath M. (2006) Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (2008) Features on bound pronouns. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Béjar S. (eds) Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (2009) Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka M. (1992) Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In: Sag I., Szabolcsi A. (eds) Lexical matters.. CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp 29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Link G. (1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Bäuerle R., Schwarze C., Stechow A. (eds) Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 302–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkind W. (1945) Winnebago grammar. King’s Crown Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis M. (2005) On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81: 699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay G. (1978) Pronominal person and number categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana. Oceanic Linguistics 17: 27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay G. (1979) Gender and the category unit augmented. Oceanic Linguistics 18: 203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, A. I. (2003). Do person/number syncretisms refer to negative values? Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America, Atlanta.

  • Nevins A. (2008) Cross-modular parallels in the study of phon and phi. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Béjar S. (eds) Phi theory: Phi-features across interfaces and modules. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 329–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer R. (1992) Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltra-Massuet, I. (2000). On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Sauerland U. (2008) On the semantic markedness of phi-features. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Béjar S. (eds) Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, P. (2003). Indexicality, logophoricity, and plural pronouns. In J. Lecarme (Ed.), Research in Afroasiatic grammar II (selected papers from the fifth conference on Afroasiatic languages, Paris, 2000) (pp. 409–428). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Siewierska A. (2004) Person. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein M. (1976) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: Dixon R.M.W. (eds) Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Australian Institutes of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp 112–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, R. W. (1992). Jemez syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.

  • Thomas D. (1955) Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11: 204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommer J. (2008) A feature-geometric approach to Amharic verb classes. In: Bachrach A., Nevins A. (eds) Inflectional identity.. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 206–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulas G. (2008). On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman, & D. Hill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MIT (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 56, pp. 333–348)). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Tuite K. (1995). Svan and its speakers. Ms., Université de Montréal. http://www.mapageweb.umontreal.ca/tuitekj/publications.htm.

  • Watanabe A. (2010) Vague quantity, numerals and natural numbers. Syntax 13: 37–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins L.J. (1984) A grammar of Kiowa. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich D. (2001) How gaps and substitutions can become optimal: The pronominal affix paradigms of Yimas. Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 315–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yumitani, Y. (1998). A phonology and morphology of Jemez Towa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas.

  • Zwicky A. (1977) Hierarchies of person. Chicago Linguistics Society 13: 714–733

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Daniel Harbour

Authors
  1. Daniel Harbour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Harbour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harbour, D. Descriptive and explanatory markedness. Morphology 21, 223–245 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9167-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9167-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation