Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is “Real-World” ID Anyway?

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “real-world ID” is commonly heard at professional conferences, but its meaning is assumed rather than defined. Unless we examine the meanings and implications of rhetoric of the field, we risk error in presenting ourselves, and we risk derailing the progress of our profession. This article examines the term “real world” as applied to instructional design, from published articles to anecdotes, and considers its meanings, assumptions, inferences and implications. Both the full term and its truncated variations are used to signal two dichotomies: 1) more and less authentic professional design practice, and 2) a contrast between design instruction and design practice. Both uses range across process, products and contexts. The scholarly literature and curricular evidence demonstrate that instruction in ID is more often authentic than artificial. Evidence from ID practice demonstrates its tremendous diversity and range, and underscores that there is no generic version of design justifying this popular stereotype. As IDT scholars and professionals, we have a responsibility to communicate with precision and to challenge overgeneralization that contributes to misconception and division in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, A-M. (2003). Instructional design in the real world: A view from the trenches. Hershey, PA: Information Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M. J., Schuch, D., Spector, J. M., & Tracey, M. W. (2005). Providing novice instructional designers realworld experiences: The PacificCorp design and development competition. TechTrends, 49(2), 20-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., Easterling, W., Hardré, P., Howard, R., & Roman, T. (2011). ADDIE: Perspectives in transition. Educational Technology, 51 (5), 34-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. & Green, T. D. (2011). Essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice (2nd ed). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, A. P. (2008). Moving from theory to real-world experiences in an e-learning community. Innovate, 4(4), retrieved from: http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=495

  • Chan, P., Miller, R., Monroe, E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship as an instructional strategy for solving corporate training challenges. (2009). TechTrends, 53(6), 35-41. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0341-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Blijd, C. W. (2010). Students’ perceptions of their learning experiences in an authentic instructional design context. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(1), 6-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. C. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An apprenticeship approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), 43-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (2007). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. & Stepich, D. A. (2005). Instructional design expertise: How will we know it when we see it? Educational Technology, 45 (6), 38-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenrich, P. (2005). Creating instructional multi-media media solutions: Practical guidelines for the real world. Santa Rose, CA: Informing Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., & Hardré, P. L. (2010). Self-processes and learning environment as influences in the development of expertise in instructional design. Learning Environments Research, 13 (1), 23-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (2010). Nonmaleficence and the preparation of classroom teachers in instructional design. Journal of Elementary and Secondary Education, 1(11), 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L. (2003). The effects of instructional design training on university teaching assistants. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16, 4, 23-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L. (2005). A case for instructional design as a professional development tool-of-choice for university teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 163-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L., Ge, X. & Thomas, M. (2005). Toward a theory of the development of expertise in instructional design. Educational Technology, 45(1), 53-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L., Ge, X. & Thomas, M. (2007). An investigation of the development of instructional design expertise. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19 (4), 55-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, H. R., Tawfik, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., & Winholtz, R. A. (2012). “I Know This is Supposed to be More Like the Real World, But . . .”: Student Perceptions of a PBL Implementation in an Undergraduate Materials Science Course. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(1), 43-81.

  • Hong, Y-C, & Choi, I (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: A conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development 59, 687–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, I.-H. (2012). Shared mental models on the performance of e-learning content development teams. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquirybased teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. B. (2005). Instructional design career environments: Survey of the alignment of preparation and practice. TechTrends, 49(6), 22-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2007). Preparing instructional designers for different career environments: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 1-24. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9031-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., Chatervert, C., Lake, K., & Wilson, R. (2008). Real world projects in an advanced instructional design course. TechTrends, 52(4), 24-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams van Rooij, S. (2010). Project management in instructional design: ADDIE is not enough. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 852-864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R., & Schwier, R. A. (2010). Authenticity in the process of learning about instructional design. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 35(2). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/520/253

  • Wood, R. E., Beckmann, J. F., & Birney, D. P. (2009). Simulations, learning and real world capabilities. Education & Training, 51(5/6), 491-510. doi:10.1108/00400910910987273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, N., & Quinn, J. (2009). Learners’ perceptions of instructional design practice in a situated learning activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 25-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA

    Patricia L. Hardré

Authors
  1. Patricia L. Hardré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia L. Hardré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardré, P.L. What is “Real-World” ID Anyway?. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 57, 31–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0628-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0628-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation