Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous foot joint needle placement using a C-arm flat-panel detector CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Image guidance is valuable for diagnostic injections in foot orthopaedics. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT) was implemented using a C-arm, and the system was tested for needle guidance in foot joint injections.

Methods

FD-CT—guided joint infiltration was performed in 6 patients referred from the orthopaedic department for diagnostic foot injections. All interventions were performed utilising a flat-panel fluoroscopy system utilising specialised image guidance and planning software. Successful infiltration was defined by localisation of contrast media depot in the targeted joint. The pre- and post-interventional numeric analogue scale (NAS) pain score was assessed.

Results

All injections were technically successful. Contrast media deposit was documented in all targeted joints. Significant relief of symptoms was noted by all 6 participants.

Conclusions

FD-CT—guided joint infiltration is a feasible method for diagnostic infiltration of midfoot and hindfoot joints. The FD-CT approach may become an alternative to commonly used 2D-fluoroscopically guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kretzschmar M, Wiewiorski M, Rasch H, Jacob AL, Bilecen D, Walter MA, Valderrabano V (2010) (99m)Tc-DPD-SPECT/CT predicts the outcome of imaging-guided diagnostic anaesthetic injections: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.013

  2. Mitchell MJ, Bielecki D, Bergman AG, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1995) Localization of specific joint causing hindfoot pain: value of injecting local anesthetics into individual joints during arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(6): 1473–1476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Khoury NJ, el-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, Brandser EA (1996) Intraarticular foot and ankle injections to identify source of pain before arthrodesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(3): 669–673

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas PE, Hurwitz SR, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG, Maurer EJ (1997) Fluoroscopically guided injections into the foot and ankle: localization of the source of pain as a guide to treatment—prospective study. Radiology 204(2): 411–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones A, Regan M, Ledingham J, Pattrick M, Manhire A, Doherty M (1993) Importance of placement of intra-articular steroid injections. Bmj 307(6915): 1329–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saifuddin A, Abdus-Samee M, Mann C, Singh D, Angel JC (2005) CT guided diagnostic foot injections. Clin Radiol 60(2): 191–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grainger AJ (2005) Image guidance of foot joint injections. Clin Radiol 60(2): 189–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y (2007) Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 17(11): 2767–2779. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knight JR, Heran M, Munk PL, Raabe R, Liu DM (2008) C-arm cone-beam CT: applications for spinal cement augmentation demonstrated by three cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(7): 1118–1122. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiwatashi A, Yoshiura T, Noguchi T, Togao O, Yamashita K, Kamano H, Honda H (2008) Usefulness of cone-beam CT before and after percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(5): 1401–1405. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson C (2005) Measuring pain. Visual analog scale versus numeric pain scale: what is the difference?. J Chiropr Med 4(1): 43–44. doi:10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60112-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruhoy MK, Newberg AH, Yodlowski ML, Mizel MS, Trepman E (1998) Subtalar joint arthrography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2(4): 433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiewiorski M, Valderrabano V, Kretzschmar M, Rasch H, Markus T, Dziergwa S, Kos S, Bilecen D, Jacob AL (2009) CT-guided robotically-assisted infiltration of foot and ankle joints. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 18(5): 291–296. doi:10.1080/13645700903059193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sofka CM, Adler RS (2002) Ultrasound-guided interventions in the foot and ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6(2): 163–168. doi:10.1055/s-2002-32362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berliner L, Buffa A (2011) Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. doi:10.1007/s11548-011-0545-9

  16. Messmer P, Gross T, Suhm N, Regazzoni P, Jacob AL, Huegli RW (2004) Modality-based navigation. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S-A24–A29

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Wiewiorski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiewiorski, M., Takes, M.T.L., Valderrabano, V. et al. Percutaneous foot joint needle placement using a C-arm flat-panel detector CT. Int J CARS 7, 177–180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0630-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0630-0

Keywords

Navigation